Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs)

This study is designed to evaluate topical wound products for DFUs using a hybrid design that combines prospectively randomized treatment arms with external control cohorts.

This study is designed to evaluate whether the Miro3D Wound Matrix, when used in addition to standard of care, improves healing outcomes in patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic foot ulcers are a common and serious complication of diabetes and may be difficult to heal despite appropriate treatment. Standard of care typically includes regular wound cleaning, debridement (removal of dead tissue), offloading (reducing pressure on the wound), and moisture-balancing dressings. However, some wounds fail to heal with standard treatment alone. Miro3D Wound Matrix is a three-dimensional, acellular scaffold derived from porcine tissue that is intended to support wound healing. This study will compare outcomes in patients treated with Miro3D plus standard of care versus standard of care alone. Approximately 180 adult subjects with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers will be enrolled at multiple clinical sites in the United States. After a two-week screening period, eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Miro3D in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone. Subjects will be followed for up to 12 weeks with weekly clinic visits. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether treatment with Miro3D increases the rate of complete wound closure and improves reduction in wound size compared to standard of care alone. Safety will also be evaluated by monitoring adverse events throughout the study.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug Nu-3 works to treat mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers in adults with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes at 3 different dose levels. It will also learn about the safety of drug Nu-3. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does drug Nu-3 lower the number of bacteria or viruses in the infected ulcer, or cure patients of the infection, at any or all of the dose levels being tested after 1 week or 2 weeks? What medical problems do participants have when taking the topical drug Nu-3? Researchers will compare drug Nu-3 at different dose levels to see if drug Nu-3 works to treat the infected ulcers at each of the dose levels. Participants will: Take drug ABC or a placebo every day for 4 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a rescue inhaler

Real world evidence study on the performance and safety of a nitric oxide generating dressing on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Miro3D Wound Matrix plus Standard of Care (SOC) compared to SOC alone in treating Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and wound dehiscence in an outpatient setting. The trial is sponsored by Reprise Biomedical, Inc. and aims to explore whether the addition of Miro3D-a three-dimensional, acellular porcine-derived wound matrix-enhances wound healing outcomes compared to SOC alone. Purpose of the Study: The primary purpose of the study is to determine whether applying Miro3D in combination with SOC leads to improved healing of diabetic foot ulcers compared to SOC alone. Specifically, the study seeks to assess early wound healing progress at four weeks (as measured by percent area reduction and granulation tissue formation) as a predictor of complete healing by twelve weeks. Key Question the Study Seeks to Answer: Does the addition of Miro3D to standard wound care improve the healing rate and overall wound outcomes for patients with Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers or dehisced wounds compared to standard care alone? Study Design Overview: Subjects who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized into one of two groups: 1. Miro3D + SOC arm - receiving Miro3D weekly for 4 weeks, then biweekly if needed, for up to 12 weeks. 2. SOC alone (control) arm - receiving SOC without Miro3D. If the wound remains unhealed at 12 weeks in the SOC alone arm, participants may "crossover" to receive Miro3D treatment under the same schedule for an additional 12 weeks. Primary Endpoint: 1\. Percent Area Reduction (PAR) and granulation tissue formation at 4 weeks, serving as predictors for wound healing at 12 weeks. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Quality of Life (QOL) improvements, including pain, mobility, and emotional well-being, assessed using a validated Wound/Ulcer-QOL tool. 2. Pain levels using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at each visit. Population: Approximately 30 adult subjects (15 per arm) with Wagner Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcers or dehisced wounds will be enrolled. Subjects must have adequate blood flow, demonstrate wound size criteria, and commit to offloading and follow-up care. Follow-Up: Subjects will be followed weekly through the 12-week study period. Healed subjects will undergo confirmation visits at 2 and 4 weeks post-closure. Subjects in the crossover arm will be followed for an additional 12 weeks if their wound was unhealed at the primary endpoint. Statistical Considerations: Data will be summarized using descriptive statistics, including wound measurements, infection status, and healing rates. Comparative analysis will be conducted between treatment groups and schedules (weekly vs. biweekly Miro3D application). Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and device-related events will also be documented. This study aims to generate clinical evidence supporting the use of Miro3D as a beneficial adjunct to standard wound care in promoting early and complete healing of diabetic foot ulcers.

This clinical study is being conducted to evaluate how well the Miro3D Wound Matrix helps heal difficult wounds and ulcerations in an outpatient care setting. Miro3D is a biologic wound dressing made from porcine (pig) liver tissue. It is processed to remove all cells, creating a clean scaffold that can support the body's natural healing process. The goal of this study is to see how effective Miro3D is when used alongside standard wound care for helping wounds close and reducing pain and discomfort. The study is designed as a post-market, proof-of-concept trial, meaning the product is already commercially available, and researchers are evaluating how it works in real-world clinical settings. A total of up to 20 adult participants will be enrolled. Participants may have wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, or surgical wound dehiscence. These wounds may be complex in nature, including tunneling or undermining, which often makes them more difficult to treat. Participants will receive standard wound care along with weekly Miro3D applications for the first 4 weeks. If the wound is not fully healed after 4 weeks, Miro3D will then be applied every 2 weeks until healing is achieved or up to 12 weeks total. Throughout the study, participants will return weekly for wound assessments and to complete brief questionnaires about their pain levels and quality of life. The main goals of the study are: 1. To measure how much the wound size shrinks (known as percent area reduction or PAR). 2. To evaluate how much healthy granulation tissue (new tissue) forms in the wound. 3. To compare healing outcomes when Miro3D is used weekly versus every two weeks. 4. To understand how the treatment affects patients' quality of life, including pain, mobility, and emotional wellbeing. Each participant will be closely monitored by the clinical team throughout the 12-week study period. If a wound heals earlier, the participant will finish the study at that time. If the wound does not heal, the participant may return to their regular physician for follow-up care.

Chronic wounds constitute a significant global health burden, affecting millions of individuals and contributing to increased morbidity, diminished quality of life, and rising healthcare costs. These wounds are characterized by delayed healing and are often associated with complex etiologies and prolonged treatment courses. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Carbonlife amniotic tissue products (ATPs) compared to standard wound care in the management of chronic wounds. A prospective, controlled clinical trial will be conducted across diverse care settings and patient populations with varying wound etiologies. Participants will be stratified by wound type and treatment environment to enable subgroup analyses. The primary endpoint will assess wound healing outcomes, while secondary endpoints will include quality-of-life measures and healthcare resource utilization. The study is designed to generate high-quality evidence regarding the therapeutic value of ATPs in chronic wound management. Stratified analyses will provide insights into the differential effectiveness of ATPs across clinical contexts. Findings are anticipated to have implications for clinical practice guidelines and healthcare policy, with the goal of improving patient outcomes and optimizing resource allocation in wound care.

For people with diabetes who are at risk of foot ulcers, this study compares three digital foot care strategies (with different levels of intensity) to see which one is more effective at preventing ulcers and easier to use.

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Data are transmitted daily to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-recognized Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The registry captures real-time, research-ready data on patient demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, standard-of-care treatments, complications, and advanced therapeutics. It supports robust, fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation by enabling risk-adjusted outcome analysis, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement across diverse sites of care.

The main purpose of this research study is to compare the proportion of wound closure in subjects that receive E-GRAFT™ with Standard of Care (SOC) versus FIBRACOL™ with SOC. Other research purposes include the following: * Rate of wound closure * Change in ulcer size over 12 weeks * Any adverse events or reactions (side effects) * Changes in neuropathy (nerve damage) * Change in pain levels * Occurrence of infection