Diabetic Macular Edema

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, Pharmacodynamics (PD), and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple doses of RO7823653 in participants with DME, administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection as monotherapy and co-administered with faricimab.

This study is open to adults with diabetic macular edema that involves the center of the eye. The purpose of this study is to find out how well different doses of a medicine called BI 3812465 are tolerated by people with this condition. This is the first time BI 3812465 is given to humans. This study has 2 parts. In Part 1, a small number of participants receive low, medium, or high doses of BI 3812465. The first participants to start the study get low doses of BI 3812465. Participants who start later get higher doses only if the lower doses were tolerated. In Part 2, a larger number of participants are placed into low, medium, or high dose groups. Participants in both parts of the study get BI 3812465 as injections into the back of the eye for a total of 3 eye injections. Participants are in the study for up to 7 months. During this time, they visit the study site 19 times. Where possible, some visits can be done at the participant's home instead of the study site. At study visits, the doctors check the severity of participants' eye condition and note any health problems that could have been caused by BI 3812465.

This pilot prospective, interventional, longitudinal study, aims to evaluate the potential benefits of the probiotic supplement Lactobacillus plantarum 299v in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The study seeks to address the following questions: 1. Does central macular thickness on optical coherence tomography decrease after 4 months of supplementation? 2. Is visual acuity improved at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months following initiation of supplementation? 3. Is the number of anti-VEGF injections reduced following initiation of supplementation? Outcomes will be compared to a control group, using historic retrospective data. Participants will take Lactobacillus plantarum 299v orally twice daily for four months.

THN391-OPT-101 is a study assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of THN391 in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) given as monotherapy.

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections introduce additional fluid volume into the eye, which can cause an acute, transient elevation in intraocular pressure (IOP). The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the immediate and early changes in intraocular pressure following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and to determine how rapidly pressure recovers toward baseline levels. Adult participants scheduled to receive routine intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy for established clinical indications, such as diabetic macular edema, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion, will be enrolled. Intraocular pressure will be measured using an Icare rebound tonometer with single-use disposable probes before injection (baseline) and at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 20 minutes post-injection. The study will also analyze whether factors such as refractive error, the number of prior injections, or the type of anti-VEGF drug administered affect the severity of post-injection pressure spikes and subsequent recovery.

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are a mainstay of treatment for retinal diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion, and usually require repeated administration over years. During each injection an eyelid speculum holds the lids open and the upper eyelid is exposed to repeated mechanical stretch. Aponeurotic ptosis after intraocular surgery is well described, but evidence on blepharoptosis after repeated intravitreal injections is limited and conflicting. This single-center prospective observational study enrolls 60 patients who are starting intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in one eye only; the untreated fellow eye of each patient serves as an internal control. Upper eyelid position and function are assessed with margin reflex distance-1 (MRD-1), margin reflex distance-2 (MRD-2) and levator function at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6 and 12. The primary endpoint is the difference between the injected eye and the fellow eye in the change in MRD-1 from baseline to month 12.

The YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, which studied DMO treated with faricimab, had a majority Caucasian cohort, and the small Asian cohort was East Asian, with no South Asian representation. South Asians have a much higher prevalence of diabetes and its ophthalmic complication of DMO. The SEAFAR study is designed to address this unmet need by specifically evaluating faricimab in a UK-based South Asian cohort with diabetic macular oedema (DMO), delivered via a pragmatic treat-and-extend regimen, for clinically meaningful visual acuity gains, durable anatomic control of DMO, and an acceptable safety profile at week 88 in South Asian patients, with interim benefits by week 52.

A Phase 1 study to assess the safety and efficacy of OCU200 for center-involved diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of central visual loss in diabetic patients and a global public health burden around the world. Most patients with DME and vision loss require pharmacological inhibition using anti-VEGF agents with multiple monitoring visits that require both visual acuity testing and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine if re-treatment is warranted as well as the recommended time interval to the next follow-up visit. However, this treatment regimen often requires monthly or every other month clinic visits, which places a substantial burden on ophthalmic clinics and patients. Recently, portable self-administered Home OCT devices have been developed that allow for home-based OCT scanning of retinal diseases, e.g., DME, although these devices do not include visual acuity determination. The investigators previously proposed to deliver Home OCT devices and Home visual acuity tester to patients\' homes to complete routine monitoring visits at home. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this novel monitoring regimen for DME patients, specifically whether its use could reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes. This study aims to provide evidence to support use of a novel monitoring regimen for DME patients that could substantially reduce the burden associated with frequent hospital visits without sacrificing visual acuity outcomes.

The purpose of this research study is to test whether a personalised care approach improves adherence compared to standard care. Many patients with macular diseases like age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema need regular eye injections to protect their vision. However, some do not adhere to their treatment appointments, risking further vision loss. You were selected as a possible participant in this research study because you have been diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macula edema (DME) requiring intravitreal injection treatment (IVT). This research study targets to recruit 200 participants from the Singapore National Eye Centre. This study comprises two cohort groups: Cohort 1(Suboptimal CAT scores/ Randomized Control trial) and Cohort 2 (Optimal CAT scores/Observation). If you agree to take part in this study, the research coordinator will obtain your written consent before proceeding with the study procedures. You will be required to complete CAT assessment (via remote or administered in clinic) and assigned to cohort 1 or cohort 2 based on CAT scores result. If you are assigned to cohort 1, you will be randomly allocated to either the personalized multi-disciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI) or standard care group. Randomization means assigning you to one of two groups by chance, like tossing a coin or rolling a dice. * MPI group: You will complete a specialized computerized adaptive testing (CAT) quality of life questionnaire. Based on the domain specific scores, you will receive a medical consultation and a referral to nurse educators, optometrists, occupational therapists, or social workers. * Standard care group: If you are allocated to this group, you will receive standard care, where doctors make treatment decisions without using the CAT results. If you are assigned to cohort 2, you will be placed under prospective observation and undergo routine clinical care.

This is a Randomized, Double-masked, Parallel-group, Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AVT29 Compared with Eylea HD in Participants with Diabetic Macular Edema.

The objectives of this investigation are to assess: 1. whether oral K9 is safe in subjects with DME, and 2. whether oral K9 improves BCVA compared to oral placebo

This phase 2b trial is a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multi-center study in approximately 156 patients with DME to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CU06-1004 orally administered once daily for 24 weeks. The study will have a 1:1:1 randomization (CU06-1004 200mg: CU06-1004 300mg: Placebo).

The main retinal diseases, whether or not associated with specific mutations genetic, cause progressive degeneration of vascular retinal structures and not vascular, resulting in decreased visual function. Often, such diseases affect the noblest part of the retina, called macula. Many retinal diseases can be complicated by choroidal neovascularization which causes frequent bleeding and fluid leakage that accumulates in the subretinal and intraretinal spaces. Although the investigators know many details of each disease affecting the retina, very often the correct diagnostic framework can be complicated, given the presence of morphological elements common to the different pathologies. Similarly, predicting the effect of treatment and the patient's outcome is a constant challenge for the ophthalmologists. Most of the current research has been focused on the assessment of vascular alterations localized in the macula. However, growing evidence highlight the importance of peripheral vascular changes on the outcome of retinal diseases. These changes can be detected only be wide field OCT devices. On the other hand, ocular inflammation and hyperemia represent major assessments in anterior segment disorders, such as dry eye disease. The current grading systems of ocular inflammation, redness and hyperemia are characterized by several limitations, thus making these evaluations still mainly confined to the subjective assessment performed by the ophthalmologist. However, the new generation OCT devices may include also an anterior segment module which can reconstruct anterior segment vessels, non-invasively, using the same technology described for retinal diseases. The main goal of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of a new generation wide field OCTA device in ocular diseases, which has recently received CE marking. In particular, the investigators will evaluate this new generation device both in retinal and anterior segments diseases, testing for common points and differences with the standard of care non-invasive diagnostic devices. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of the correlation between the patient's visual function (visual acuity) and morphological changes (standard of care imaging assessment) highlighted by the wide field OCT device, with particular attention to microstructural differences between major ocular diseases and the possible development of non-invasive biomarkers, useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of such pathologies.

To assess the safety and efficacy of 532 nm subthreshold micropulse laser 5 % duty cycle compared with 15 % duty cycle in treatment of diabetic macular edema .

This study aims to investigate the association between serum biomarkers and clinical response to anti-VEGF or dexamethasone implant by assessing OCT-biomarkers in patients with diabetic macular edema, DME, and to compare these with a group of naive patients (those not previously treated for DME).

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the leading cause for blindness in working-age adults. The current gold standard treatment for PDR is panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). In current clinical practice, both single-session and multiple-session PRP approaches are widely accepted and utilized. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of single-session and multiple-session PRP.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of levosulpiride to improve retinal alterations due to diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy

The goal of this observational study is to detect early retinal changes in people with diabetes who do not have visual symptoms. The study will use Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and fundus examination to screen for early retinal involvement in diabetic patients. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Can OCT detect early retinal changes before symptoms appear in people with diabetes? Is fundus examination useful for identifying early diabetic retinal changes? Participants will undergo a comprehensive eye examination, including OCT macular scans and fundus examination, at Assiut Ophthalmology Hospital. No treatment or invasive procedures will be performed as part of this study. The collected data will help improve early detection and prevention of diabetic retinal complications.

Treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macula edema has included panretinal photocoagulation and intra ocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents and steroids. Anti-VEGF therapy is currently the first-line treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathies; however, this approach is ineffective in more than 30% of patients with diabetic retinal complications. Available evidence shows that subcutaneous (under the skin) injection of octreotide, a somatostatin analog, has potential therapeutic benefits in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macula edema (DME). This study thus seeks to determine the efficacy and safety of intranasal DDM-octreotide in the treatment of diabetic macula edema in individuals that are considered to be refractory to the current therapeutic options.

This is an open label dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and treatment benefits of MS-553 in treatment-naive diabetic retinopathy patients with central involved macular edema. Fifteen subjects with diabetic macular edema will be enrolled into each of three dose cohorts and will receive oral administration of MS-553 for 8 weeks.

The objective of this study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of SNP318 in patients with DME.

This study aims to evaluate the progression of non-center-involving diabetic macular edema in the early postoperative period following phacoemulsification.

The purpose of this clinical study is to explore the efficacy of dapagliflozin as an adjunct to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for enhanced reduction of retinal thickness and vision improvement in patients with diabetic macular edema. The main question the study aims to answer is: Does dapagliflozin reduce the thickness of the macula when combined with the standard of care intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy more than the intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy alone?

Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment (or visual acuity) in patients with diabetic retinopathy, as it leads to progressive thickening of the retina, which in the long term leads to progressive death of the photoreceptor cells. It is therefore important to continue to treat macular oedema that has been progressing for several months or even years (resistant DME). The management of DME necessarily involves controlling diabetes (improving glycated haemoglobin levels) and blood pressure, but this is often not enough. Thus, when DME is significant and leads to a decrease in visual acuity, treatments are administered directly into the eye (intravitreal injections). For some years now, corticosteroids have been injected into the vitreous body (the gel that fills the eyeball) through the white of the eye for their anti-inflammatory properties. Indeed, these drugs improve the permeability of the retinal vessels and thus reduce oedema. These intravitreal implants are most often used in patients who have already undergone cataract surgery (pseudophakic) because corticosteroids also tend to aggravate a cataract. Currently, there are two implants containing corticosteroids that can be injected: the dexamethasone implant and the fluocinolone acetonide implant. These two implants have different properties, particularly with regard to their duration of action. Today, the overall management at 3 years and the quality of life associated with the treatments deserve to be evaluated. This study is the first multicenter controlled trial comparing the two reference corticosteroid treatments in terms of overall cost of treatment and follow-up and patient quality of life, while considering their efficacy and side effects. This evaluation will make it possible to precisely define the respective place of each implant in the management of resistant DME.