Double Lumen Tube Intubation

This multicentre randomised controlled trial compares a video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube with a conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in adults undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. The video-guided tube incorporates an integrated camera that provides continuous airway visualisation during initial placement and intraoperative monitoring. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the two tubes. Final tube position after initial placement will be confirmed by fibreoptic bronchoscopy in both groups. During one-lung ventilation, additional fibreoptic bronchoscopy will be performed only when clinically indicated or according to predefined rescue criteria. The primary outcome is successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube placement. Secondary outcomes include right upper-lobe bronchial obstruction, intraoperative tube displacement, hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation, requirement for rescue fibreoptic bronchoscopy, time to satisfactory tube positioning, quality of operative lung collapse, and the number of intraoperative tube repositioning events. Participants and outcome assessors will remain blinded to treatment allocation, whereas the anaesthesiologist performing intubation cannot be blinded because of the distinct visual and operational characteristics of the two devices. The study aims to determine whether continuous airway visualisation improves the effectiveness and stability of right-sided double-lumen tube management during thoracoscopic surgery.

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center, three-arm, open-label, low-risk medical device clinical study conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Trakya University Medical Faculty. The study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical usability of three laryngoscopy methods for double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) intubation in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation: (i) C-MAC hyperangulated (D-blade) videolaryngoscopy, (ii) C-MAC Macintosh blade videolaryngoscopy, and (iii) direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The primary outcome is the total time to successful DLT placement (in seconds), defined as the interval from the end of mask ventilation to fiberoptic bronchoscopic confirmation of correct tube position. Secondary outcomes include glottic visualization quality (POGO score and Cormack-Lehane grade), intubation difficulty (Intubation Difficulty Scale), number of intubation attempts, need for auxiliary maneuvers, intubation-related complications, malposition rate, and postoperative airway symptoms (sore throat, dysphonia) assessed at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years), ASA class I-III, scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Patients with anticipated difficult airway, emergency surgery, pregnancy, or prior upper airway surgery are excluded. A total of 180 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 into three groups (60 per group) using computer-generated block randomization.

The goal of this clinical trial is to know which type of laryngoscope is better for Double Lumen Tube (DLT) insertion, in participants undergoing elective thoracic surgeries. The main question aim to answer is Is C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope better than Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT insertion in term of time taking for intubation and hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy? Researchers are comparing two groups of participants * Participants in Group A are receiving intubation from C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope. * Participants in Group B are receiving intubations from Macintosh laryngoscope.