End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)

People with end-stage kidney disease who receive hemodialysis are often told to strictly limit foods high in potassium, such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, and whole grains. This advice is intended to prevent high blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), which can cause dangerous heart rhythm problems. However, these restrictions can make eating difficult, reduce diet quality, and lower quality of life. New research suggests that not all sources of potassium affect the body in the same way. Potassium added to highly processed foods is more easily absorbed than potassium naturally found in whole foods like fruits and vegetables. Large studies have found little evidence that eating potassium-rich whole foods increases blood potassium levels in people on dialysis. Clinical guidelines are beginning to shift, but no high-quality clinical trial has tested whether a more flexible, food-based approach is safe for people receiving hemodialysis. This study will compare two dietary approaches in 148 adults on hemodialysis: the usual low potassium diet and a "liberalized" potassium diet that encourages minimally processed foods while limiting highly processed foods with potassium additives. Participants will receive dietitian support and grocery assistance for 12 weeks. The investigators will closely monitor blood potassium levels to ensure safety. The investigators will also examine whether the liberalized diet is as safe as standard care, and whether it improves diet quality and quality of life. The investigators will also study factors that influence the participant's ability to follow the diet in real-world settings. If safe, this approach could reduce unnecessary food restrictions, improve diet quality, and enhance quality of life for people receiving hemodialysis, while maintaining patient safety.

This study will evaluate three Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) called REGN9933, REGN7508, and REGN9533. The study is focused on participants with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis and standard anticoagulant treatment, such as heparin, to reduce the risk of blood clots as they can lead to serious health problems or be life-threatening. Because participants with ESKD who have hemodialysis have a higher risk of bleeding, the IMPs could be a meaningful new therapeutic option. The main aim of the study is to see what side effects may happen from taking REGN9933, REGN7508, or REGN9533. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * How much IMP is in the blood at different times and * If the IMPs affect the ability of the blood to clot normally

Many people who have kidney failure require hemodialysis treatments to stay alive. Hemodialysis is a procedure that cleans the blood of the toxins and fluids that build up when kidneys don't work. Most patients receive hemodialysis treatment three times every week and each treatment lasts 4 hours. These patients spend 156 days per year receiving hemodialysis treatments. This is a very large time burden which has a tremendous impact on well-being and life satisfaction. Current usual approach of prescribing three hemodialysis treatments per week is not based on good studies and assumes that all people need the same number of hemodialysis treatments per week regardless of their age, values, life expectancy or other health conditions. Over time, increasingly more elderly people are needing to start hemodialysis treatments. The investigators have conducted a preliminary study that shows that patients who are 70 years of age or older can do well when only receiving only two hemodialysis treatments per week. In this preliminary study, receiving two hemodialysis treatments per week was no different than three hemodialysis treatments per week with regards to important safety measures including blood values and management of body fluid levels. The investigators now propose to carry out a much larger study in many centers across Canada that will compare two times per week hemodialysis treatments to three times per week hemodialysis treatments in elderly patients who have reached kidney failure and are beginning their hemodialysis journey. The investigators want to know if receiving hemodialysis treatments twice per week increases the number of days that a patient is able to spend at home without increasing rates of hospitalization or death compared to receiving hemodialysis treatments three times per week. The investigators also want to know if this is better for people's quality of life, safe, less expensive for the health care system and friendlier to the environment. The results of this study will help elderly patients needing to start hemodialysis treatments, medical care teams who help make decisions about how many hemodialysis treatments per week are necessary as well as kidney organizations that oversee kidney care for patients in Canada and around the world.

This is a phase 1b, partial-blind (Sponsor unblinded), randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CSL300 after single and multiple doses in Chinese participants with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis.

This study aims to compare the effects of medium cut-off (MCO) and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on mineral and bone metabolism biomarkers in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is characterized by disturbances in biomarkers such as fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and sclerostin, which are associated with bone turnover, vascular calcification, and adverse clinical outcomes. This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover clinical study. Thirty adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis will be randomized to receive either MCO membrane treatment followed by high-flux membrane treatment or the reverse sequence, with each treatment period lasting three months. Serum FGF-23 and sclerostin levels will be measured at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6. Additional assessments will include pulse wave velocity (PWV), body composition monitoring (BCM), handgrip strength, health-related quality of life (KDQOL-36), pruritus severity (UP-Dial), and pain assessment (SF-MPQ). The study will evaluate whether MCO membranes provide additional benefits compared with conventional high-flux membranes regarding CKD-MBD-related biomarkers and patient-centered outcomes.

This observational study will compare cardiovascular status, bone mineral metabolism, systemic inflammation, body composition, functional status, quality of life, pruritus, and pain among patients receiving different renal replacement therapy modalities and healthy controls. Adult participants will be included in four groups: maintenance hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, automated peritoneal dialysis, and healthy controls. No new treatment, drug, dialysis modality, or experimental device will be assigned as part of the study. Participants will continue their routine clinical care. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), and sclerostin levels will be measured. Arterial stiffness will be assessed using pulse wave velocity (PWV), and body composition will be assessed using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM). Handgrip strength, quality of life, pruritus, and pain scores will also be evaluated. The study will also explore correlations between biochemical biomarkers, arterial stiffness, body composition, and patient-reported outcomes. In the automated peritoneal dialysis group, objective treatment adherence will additionally be assessed using the Sharesource (Baxter/Vantive) cloud-based remote patient monitoring platform.

Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired quality of life. Medium cut-Off (MCO) hemodialysis membranes have been developed to enhance the removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins compared with conventional high-flux membranes, which may improve inflammatory status and cardiovascular health. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of MCO and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on inflammatory biomarkers and cardiovascular function in adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The primary outcomes are changes in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) levels. Secondary outcomes include arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV), body composition assessed by Body Composition Monitor (BCM), handgrip strength, and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life, pruritus, and pain scores. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study conducted at Gazi University Faculty of Medicine. Thirty adult hemodialysis patients will be randomized to one of two treatment sequences. Participants in Sequence A will receive MCO dialysis membranes for the first 3 months followed by high-flux membranes for the next 3 months. Participants in Sequence B will receive high-flux membranes for the first 3 months followed by MCO membranes for the next 3 months. Blood samples and clinical assessments will be performed at baseline, month 3, and month 6. The study is expected to provide evidence regarding the effects of different dialysis membrane technologies on inflammation and cardiovascular health and may contribute to optimizing membrane selection in routine hemodialysis practice.

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are essential for evaluating intervention effects but are often challenged by regulatory and logistical burdens, high costs, and extended timelines. To address these challenges, the 'Adaptive Platform Trial in Kidney Disease' (APT-KIDNEY) will establish an investigator-initiated platform trial built on a unified regulatory, contractual, and operational framework. The platform emphasizes adaptive, cost-efficient methodology, automated data capture via linkage to electronic health records and administrative registers, and stakeholder engagement. Objectives: The primary objective of APT-KIDNEY is to establish an adaptive platform trial for evaluation of multiple interventions in patients with advanced kidney disease as defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis or conservative care. Study design: APT-KIDNEY is a pragmatic, randomized, embedded, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial with interventions organized into domains, emphasizing low-intervention comparisons. Domains may be open-label or blinded and will be able to use response-adaptive randomization, adaptive stopping and arm-dropping, and adaptive enrichment to enhance efficiency and relevance where applicable. Study population: Adults (≥18 years) with advanced kidney disease defined by eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months or ESKD on hemo- or peritoneal dialysis who are eligible for ≥1 one domain. Key exclusions include inability to provide informed consent; domain-specific exclusions may apply, but eligibility cannot be broadened beyond the core protocol. Trial outcomes: Core outcomes will be all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Abbreviated methods: APT-KIDNEY will permit domains to use frequentist and/or Bayesian methods. Primary analyses will target prespecified primary estimands and be conducted using the full analysis set. Prespecified sensitivity analyses will assess robustness to alternative strategies for intercurrent events and missing data, including per-protocol and as-treated supportive analyses. Outcomes are analyzed with generalized linear/mixed models and time-to-event methods with covariate adjustment. Frequentist analyses will be fixed-sample or group-sequential; results will be reported with 95% CIs and p-values, and Bayesian analyses will report posterior effects with 95% credible intervals and posterior probabilities. Bayesian domains will primarily use neutral, mildly skeptical priors. Multiplicity will be controlled at the domain level by a prespecified hierarchy: primary comparisons will precede secondary outcomes. Advanced adaptive domains will be evaluated by simulation to quantify operating characteristics including, power and Type I error, and the impact of outcome delays and missing data. Perspectives: APT-KIDNEY will establish an enduring, investigator-led platform for pragmatic, embedded nephrology trials, reducing start-up time and administrative burden through a shared regulatory and operational framework. Using standardized core outcomes and automated follow-up via electronic health records and national registers, it will generate faster, comparable, practice-relevant evidence across multiple interventions.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the health effects of expanded hemodialysis in patients receiving hemodialysis. The main question it aims to answer is: 1\) Does expanded hemodialysis reduce the risk of death from any cause? Researchers will compare expanded hemodialysis to conventional hemodialysis (the treatment currently used for the majority of patients receiving hemodialysis) to see if expanded hemodialysis works to improve patient outcomes. Participants will continue to receive their regularly scheduled hemodialysis treatments using either a super high-flux/expanded dialysis filter or a high-flux/conventional dialysis filter. All other aspects of treatments remain the same. No additional tests or visits are required. Data will be obtained using administrative healthcare databases and medical record review (at a subset of participating locations).

This study aims to understand how the antiviral medication letermovir (PREVYMIS) is processed by the body in adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), including those who are receiving intermittent haemodialysis and those who are not. Letermovir is already approved in many countries, including Australia, for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in patients who have received stem cell transplants. However, its pharmacokinetics - or how the drug is absorbed, distributed, and cleared from the body - have not been studied in patients with ESKD, especially those on dialysis. This is a single-centre, open-label, interventional pharmacokinetic study. It will recruit 20 adult participants, split into two groups: 10 participants on intermittent haemodialysis and 10 not undergoing dialysis. All participants will receive a single oral dose of 480 mg letermovir. The study does not involve treatment for CMV infection. Instead, it focuses only on how the drug behaves in the body in this patient population. Participants will have blood samples collected before and after taking the medication to measure drug concentrations over time. In patients on dialysis, an additional sample will be taken from the dialysis machine to understand if letermovir is removed during treatment. No more than 35 mL of blood (around two tablespoons) will be collected across two study visits. The goal of this study is to generate important safety and dosing information to help guide future use of letermovir in people with kidney failure. It is expected that these findings will support more informed clinical decisions and potentially lead to updated dosing recommendations for this group. The study is funded by Merck Sharp \& Dohme LLC (MSD), the manufacturer of letermovir, and is being conducted by researchers from The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR) and the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH). To support participation, prepaid meal vouchers, taxi vouchers, or parking tickets will be provided so that participants do not incur any out-of-pocket expenses. Participation is voluntary. The study has been approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee and is conducted according to national ethical guidelines.