Food Allergies

This clinical trial aims to investigate if oral immunotherapy can help children with cow's milk allergy tolerate cow's milk. Children aged 6-18 months can take part in the trial. Main question: What percentage of children can tolerate cow's milk after oral immunotherapy, compared with children who avoid cow's milk? Children are assigned to these two groups by chance. Children receiving oral immunotherapy will: * Take a small, increasing amount of cow's milk daily for 1-1.5 years * Attend clinic or online visits each time the dose is increased * Record missed doses All children will: * Provide blood samples to measure allergy-related markers * Undergo an oral food challenge with cow's milk after 1-1.5 years to assess how much they can tolerate * Report allergic reactions (parent-reported) * Complete questionnaires (parent-reported) * Participate in an end-of-study telephone interview with an allergy nurse (parent-reported)

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multi-food oral immunotherapy (multi-OIT) using peanut and tree nuts proteins in children with confirmed food allergy to at least two allergens. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either multi-OIT or standard management consisting of an elimination diet. The primary objective is to evaluate immunotherapy efficacy defined as achieving tolerance to a cumulative dose of 4444 mg of protein during an oral food challenge (OFC-2) for at least one allergen that elicited a reaction during baseline challenge (OFC-1), compared with the control group. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of participants tolerating multiple allergens at the target cumulative dose; the incidence, type, and severity of adverse events classified according to the World Allergy Organization (WAO) grading system; changes in immunological parameters, including allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 levels; changes in skin prick test responses; changes in the quality of life of patients and their families.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the long-term outcomes of children and young people who underwent an 18-month course of oral immunotherapy (OIT) treatment for peanut, egg or milk allergy. It aims to: • Compare long-term changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 5-15 years after stopping OIT in participants who achieved remission and those who did not. Participants will attend a single follow-up visit for: * A blood test * Skin prick test (SPT) * Allergy questionnaires

Omalizumab has demonstrated efficacy, increasing the tolerance threshold in patients with multiple food allergies, as well as reducing the risk of severe reactions when used as monotherapy. This favors improving the reactivity profile of patients with food allergy. In our setting, plant allergy caused by sensitization to panallergens such as lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and profilins entails important limitations for the consumption of a healthy diet due to the extensive dietary restrictions. The main objective of this project is to analyze the efficacy of treatment with omalizumab administered every 2-4/weeks, used in monotherapy in patients with plant allergy due to sensitization to profilin and LTPs and those patients in whom sublingual immunotherapy with Pru p 3 (peach LTP), has not been effective, by performing a before-after study we will evaluate the changes in clinical reactivity to LTP (peach) and profilin (melon) and the changes immunological effect after omalizumab intervention. In addition, we will evaluate the changes in reactivity to at least one food other than peach and melon in the different sensitization profiles.

In relation to the prognosis of vegetable FA (VFA), in contrast to other food allergies (FA), which disappear naturally with time, VFA tends to persist into adulthood and to the appearance of new sensitizations to other vegetables. The paradigm of early intervention in patients with risk factors for developing FA has changed in recent years, with evidence that maintaining a controlled diet with foods with potential allergic risk in a population of children at risk has shown efficacy in early intervention. An important aspect would be the selection of the dose of the food to be included in the diet. In this sense, recent studies on the standardization of the double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge test (DBPCFC) in allergic patients to Lipid Transfer Proteins (LTP) with known amounts of Pru p 3 (peach LTP), have observed that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was equivalent to 40 grams of peach with skin. Based on these results and those obtained in the pediatric population, this study aims to evaluate whether the maintenance in the diet of a DMT evaluated in a DBPCFC could influence tolerance (desensitization) to the food at both clinical and immunological levels.

This is a pilot, multi-centre, randomised clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of a home-based oral food challenge in adults with low-risk food allergy labels. Eligible participants are aged 18 years or older and have a self-reported food allergy with negative skin prick testing to the implicated food. Participants will be randomised to either a home-based or standard in-clinic food challenge. The primary aim is to determine the safety of home challenges, measured by the rate of immune-mediated adverse events. Secondary aims include feasibility of recruitment and delivery, protocol adherence, quality of life, and food reintroduction outcomes.