Gastrointestinal Cancers

This project aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of combined blood multi-gene methylation and fecal biomarkers for pan-digestive tract cancer screening, so as to establish a novel technical system for the early diagnosis of pan-digestive tract cancers.Individuals scheduled to receive digestive tract endoscopy are enrolled. Blood and stool samples are collected prior to endoscopic examination for detection of blood multi-gene methylation, fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and calprotectin. Endoscopic procedures are then performed. Following completion of baseline endoscopic screening, all enrolled participants will be followed up for 5 years. The primary endpoint of this study is the sensitivity and specificity of blood multi-gene methylation combined with fecal biomarkers in screening for pan-digestive tract cancers.

This Phase 2 study will be conducted in different countries around the world with up to about 160 participants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well Rina-S works against GI cancers. The medication in this study is Rina-S monotherapy (by itself; no other cancer treatments). All participants will receive active drug; no one will be given placebo. Participation in the study will require visits to the study site(s). During site visits, there will be various tests (such as blood draws) and procedures (such as recording of heart activity, imaging/X-rays) to monitor whether the study treatment is safe and effective. The duration of the study will be different for every participant, but an average study duration of 22 months is expected for participants. This will include a treatment period (expected to last an average of 12 months), plus data collection periods before and after treatment. Participants will be asked to attend 1 to 5 visits at the study clinic for each cycle (duration of an individual cycle is 21 days). If a participant's cancer stays the same or gets better, and there are not any serious problems, participants can keep getting study treatment for as long as the study is open.

This study is looking at how safe BHB810 is in adults with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEJ). The purpose of this study is also to look at: how well the study drug works, how the study drug moves into, through, and out of the body, and how your body reacts to the study drug. Participants will get an IV infusion of BHB810 every 2 weeks while on study treatment.

This is a Phase 2 prospective, randomized, controlled, double-arm study to assess personalized self-management training (PSMT) intervention efficacy and patient experiences compared to standardized self-management training (SSMT). A total of 120 gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to complete a 6-week self-management training program (either PSMT or SSMT) to be carried out by licensed occupational therapists with doctoral training. This study aims to examine whether PSMT is more effective in increasing adherence to healthy behavior recommendations compared to SSMT in GI cancer patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Non-Operative Management (NOM) and Organ Preservation First Strategy (OPFS) compared with Radical Operation (RO) in patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal cancers. Background \& Design: With the remarkable efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H or POLE-mutated gastrointestinal tumors, organ preservation has become a promising alternative to highly invasive surgeries. The NOR-MP trial is a single-center, bidirectional registry study consisting of two parts: a retrospective cohort study and a prospective observational registry. Intervention Group (NOM/OPFS): Patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy will undergo a "Watch \& Wait" (W\&W) strategy. Patients with near-cCR or non-cCR who are eligible for organ preservation will undergo local excision (LE) or endoscopic resection (including ESD or EMR). Comparison Group (Radical Operation): Patients who undergo standard radical surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The study aims to determine whether an organ-preserving approach can achieve comparable oncological outcomes and safety profiles while significantly improving patients' quality of life compared to radical surgery.

The goal of clinical trial is to test an FDA approved drug called Pafolacianine that attaches to cancer cells and lights up when seen through a special camera system in adults with a suspected primary diagnosis, or a high clinical suspicion of gastrointestinal, fore gut, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, esophageal malignancies and gyn malignancies planned for HIPEC/debulking, warranting surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: • Can CYTALUX™ (pafolacianine) injection used with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent imaging improve the detection of malignant tissue in subjects undergoing surgical resection for cancer? Participants taking part in this study will receive the study medication. Then, during the surgery the investigator team will turn on the camera to evaluate if the tumor is visible with the help of the study medication. Taking part in this study will last about 2 months.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, prospective, multi-center clinical trial, to evaluate the efficacy of silkworm pupa tablets in improving nutritional status and sarcopenia in patients with malignancies who have completed comprehensive treatment. All participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either experimental group (n=240): dietary advice + Wanshili Longbao Silkworm Pupa Tablets (main ingredients: freeze-dried active mulberry cocoon pupa powder, maltitol, milk mineral salt, mannitol, maltodextrin), 2 tablets three times daily before meals for 3 months, or control group (n=240): dietary advice + placebo (identical appearance), 2 tablets three times daily before meals for 3 months. The primary endpoint is sarcopenia prevalence at 3 months (based on AWGS 2019 criteria: muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function).

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technology that is incorporated into many modern radiation therapy systems. The quality of conventional CBCT is good enough to align patients for their daily radiation therapy but CBCT images have poor contrast and are susceptible to imaging artefacts that limit their usability for other tasks in the radiation therapy workflow. Varian Medical Systems, the sponsor of this study, has developed new CBCT imaging technology called HyperSight that so far has demonstrated increased image quality compared with conventional CBCT images. This new HyperSight CBCT imager has previously been built into Varian Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines, where the imager is enclosed in a ring that rotates around the patient. Now, HyperSight has been built into a Varian treatment machine, called TrueBeam, where the imager is mounted on a C-shaped arm that rotates around you to acquire an image. This study is being done to evaluate the image quality of HyperSight CBCT compared to conventional CBCT images, and to determine whether HyperSight CBCT can improve the process of delivering radiation treatments. The goal of this study is to collect images from this new HyperSight-TrueBeam CBCT imager from a variety of patients and locations in the body. The images will be analyzed to determine whether their quality is high enough to use for tasks other than positioning patients for treatment. For example, the study will determine whether the HyperSight images could be used to calculate a radiation plan.

After gastrointestinal or oncology surgery, it can be difficult to determine when a patient is ready to safely begin early rehabilitation or move toward discharge. Delays may prolong hospital stay, while premature decisions may increase risks. This study evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support tool that analyzes routinely collected hospital data to identify patients who are likely ready for early rehabilitation and discharge planning after surgery. The tool provides a simple yes/no output to support clinicians in their decision-making. The AI tool does not replace clinical judgment. Treating physicians remain fully responsible for all care decisions. The purpose of this study is to examine how well this tool performs in clinical practice and how it can be safely and effectively implemented to support postoperative care.

This is a research study to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 different types of routine pain management regimens used during clinically indicated, minimally invasive oncologic (cancer) surgery. This project is considered "Research" and participation is voluntary. Upon enrollment in this study, the research team will collect data from the patient's medical records. The patient will undergo all of the normal testing and procedures required pre-operatively (standard of care). The study team will then randomly assign the patient (like a flip of a coin) to one of three different study arms for pain management during surgery: 1. Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LapTAP) with Local Anesthetic (LA) 2. Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LapTAP) only 3. Local Anesthetic (LA) only The patient will receive standard pre- and post-operative care according to clinical guidelines (routine care). The study team will collect information from the patient's medical record for the first 24 hours after their surgery and upon discharge. This information will include pain scores, amount of medication required, any side effects the patient may have experienced, and satisfaction with pain control. Participation in the study will end upon discharge from the hospital.

This prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational, real-world study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an adebrelimab-based regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors.

The goal of this screening study is to determine the feasibility of completing a social needs screening tool in participants who have a past or current cancer diagnosis and reside in Metro Detroit, Michigan. Main questions to answer are: * Can we have a completion rate of at least 80% of participants filling out the screening tool? * Can we determine procedures for patient referrals based on social needs * Can we implement brief interventions based on food access and digital inclusion (ensuring everyone has access to the digital technologies they need to participate in society)

This is an Expanded Access Program (EAP) that will give the participants access to the drug SL-28 before it is approved by the FDA. Participants in this study will have Advanced Solid Tumors who failed to respond to standard therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy) or developed progressive disease at any phase of standard therapy. Researchers think the SL-28 will be effective because SL-28 has a direct activity against different types of tumors. SL-28 is a cell-based therapy, based on leukocytes isolated from healthy donors and are activated through the proprietary process. After quality assessment (sterility, viable cell count, purity, and absence of infectious diseases), they are stored at -80°C until use. Upon need, the SL-28 is thawed, followed by checking their viability, count, and sterility. Adult and older adult patients aged 18 to 65+ who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in the study. Patients receive SL-28 IV once daily on days 1-5 and 8-12. Based on the patient's response, the need for additional injections will be evaluated. If improvements in the patient's condition are confirmed by MRI, further injections can continue on a rate 5 days a week.

There has been no report on whether the patients with gastrointestinal cancer who are also inactive hepatitis B carriers should receive prophylactic use or preemptive use of an anti-viral drug entecavir during anti-tumor therapy. This open, multicentre, phase 3, randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the impact of the prophylactic use or preemptive use of an anti-viral drug entecavir on the outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who are also inactive hepatitis B carriers during chemotherapy or immunotherapy and the subsequent follow-ups, including two cohorts of chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

This study hypothesizes that electroacupuncture combined with self-administered acupressure plus doctor-prescribed treatment is effective in preventing Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS) caused by capecitabine. It aims to explore the effectiveness of this combined approach in preventing HFS in patients with malignant tumors undergoing oral capecitabine treatment. Further exploration of prevention and treatment methods may enhance the quality of life for patients during the treatment process.