Home-based Rehabilitation

The aim is to clinically validate the clinical efficacy, usability, and safety of home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the Neofect Smart Board by comparing the effects between a group using the home-based Neofect Smart Board and a group performing conventional home-based occupational therapy in patients with upper limb dysfunction in the late subacute and chronic stages of neurological diseases.

The aim is to clinically validate the clinical efficacy, usability, and safety of home-based upper limb rehabilitation training using the Neofect Smart Glove by comparing the effects between a group using the home-based Neofect Smart Glove and a group performing conventional home-based occupational therapy in patients with upper limb dysfunction in the late subacute and chronic stages of neurological diseases.

Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of neck and arm pain resulting from compression or inflammation of a cervical nerve root. Cervical epidural steroid injection is frequently used to reduce pain and improve function in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. However, long-term functional recovery may require additional rehabilitation strategies. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether adding a standardized home-based exercise program after cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection improves pain, disability, sleep quality, and quality of life in patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either injection alone or injection followed by an eight-week home-based exercise program.

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether home-based cardiac rehabilitation with a family empowerment approach can help acute coronary syndrome patients recover. The main questions to be answered are: \- Does home-based cardiac rehabilitation with a family approach effective in patients with acute coronary syndrome to improve health-related quality of life and peak Vo2? Researchers will compare with usual care to see if home-based cardiac rehabilitation with a family approach is more effective for improving health-related quality of life and peak Vo2 in ACS patients. Patient inclusion criteria 1. Patients with acute coronary syndrome who had undergone hospitalization, with a minimum home care time of 3 months and a maximum of 1 year, calculated from the day of discharge from the hospital until the time of the interview. 2. Aged 18-65 years old, participants were selected with age variations representing young adults, adults and the elderly. 3. Patients with first experience of SCA, participants were selected whether they had undergone PCI or not. 4. Patients living with family and family involved in the patient care process. 5. Physical condition allows for interviews. physical condition is evidenced by examination of stable vital signs (diastolic BP \>90, systolic \<150 mmhg; N: 60-100x/min; S: 36-380c, no pain). Psychological condition does not show symptoms of depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 instrument. 6. Willing to participate in the study. Participants will: For 12 weeks 1. Perform walking exercises as prescribed 2. Implement diets and stress management according to the module 3. Quit smoking 4. Medication compliance 5. visit the clinic to see a cardiologist, undergo a 6-minute walk test