Immunotherapy

This multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase III trial evaluates whether adding iparomlimab and tuvonralimab injection to CAPOX consolidation chemotherapy after short-course radiotherapy improves tumor response in patients with treatment-naive, proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite-stable (pMMR/MSS) locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive short-course radiotherapy followed by CAPOX plus iparomlimab and tuvonralimab, or short-course radiotherapy followed by CAPOX alone. After total neoadjuvant therapy, patients with a clinical complete response may undergo a Watch-and-Wait strategy, whereas other patients will undergo total mesorectal excision according to standard clinical practice. The primary endpoint is complete response rate, defined as pathologic complete response after surgery or clinical complete response sustained for more than 1 year. Secondary endpoints include 3-year relapse-free survival, 3-year overall survival, sphincter preservation rate, and grade 3-4 acute adverse events. Exploratory analyses will assess tissue and blood biomarkers associated with treatment response.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if sorbitol works to enhance the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with Tirellizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. It will also learn about the safety of sorbitol. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does sorbitol enhance the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy and increase the major response rate in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? Does sorbitol with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with Tirellizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) can improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer? Researchers will compare sorbitol to a standard-of-care treatment (aPD-1 + SOX chemotherapy) to see if sorbitol works to enhance the therapeutic effect (Add-on Effect) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with Tirellizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Participants will: Take sorbitol every day for 3 months in 3 treatment cycles Visit the clinic once every 4 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use a rescue inhaler Participants will follow up as planned until PD occurs, informed consent is withdrawn, or follow-up is lost (whichever occurs first). After the end of treatment and safety follow-up, all subjects will be followed up for survival (OS data collected every 3 months ±14 days).

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has emerged as the standard of care for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy can enhance treatment efficacy. Currently, the main types of research investigating immunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy for untreated ES-SCLC are concurrent radiotherapy and sequential radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of adebelizumab in combination with chemotherapy, when administered concurrently with radiotherapy versus sequentially with radiotherapy, as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.

This phase 1b/2a study evaluates the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of combining dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα) and cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients with early-stage, resectable NSCLC. Phase 1b focuses on safety and feasibility, using a 3+3 design to monitor dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), while Phase 2a assesses the major pathological response (MPR) rate with a Simon's two-stage minimax design. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, overall survival, and translational objectives such as deep immune monitoring from patient samples, with the trial expected to enroll 24 patients at CHUM over five years.

The SAVED LUNG study is a pilot Phase I trial evaluating safety and feasibility of observation versus standard-of-care surgery in operable Stage II-III (excluding N3) NSCLC patients (PD-L1 ≥50%) who achieve complete clinical response following neoadjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Participants are randomized to observation or surgery after rigorous restaging, with primary endpoints focusing on safety and feasibility. Secondary objectives include rates of cross-over to surgery, event-free survival, and overall survival, while exploratory endpoints examine ctDNA clearance and its association with clinical response.

Study Objectives： Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1; anti-PD-L1) combined with bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor; anti-VEGF) or Durvalumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1; anti-PD-L1) combined with tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; anti-CTLA4) have recently been established as a standard first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its objective response rate (ORR) is only less than 27% (1, 2), and the majority of patients died of HCC progression and liver failure. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a novel combination treatment strategy to overcome resistance to immunotherapy and improve patient outcomes. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains the standard treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3, 4). However, in our previous retrospective study (5-7), the investigators consistently observed that this combination not only improves therapeutic responses but also significantly prolongs patient survival. The tumor necrosis caused by TACE may enhance the efficacy of systemic therapies by promoting the release of neoantigens, thereby stimulating immune responses (8-14). This concept has been substantiated in two recent trials involving intermediate-stage HCC (15, 16), where the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to TACE resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, this promising approach has yet to replace the decades-old standard treatment protocols, underscoring the need for further proof-of-concept studies. Both immunotherapy (atezolizumab/bevacizumab or durvalumab/tremelimumab) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are approved treatment modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by the U.S. and Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This phase II non-randomized trial is designed to prospectively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and immunological responses in patients with unresectable HCC treated with a combination of immunotherapy and TACE. A particular focus of this study is to explore the potential immune-boosting effects of TACE, including its ability to enhance antigen presentation and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using information from wearable devices and self-reported symptoms to remotely monitor patients during immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the digital remote patient monitoring tool feasible and acceptable to patients? * Do the alerts and guidance improve symptom management, quality of life, and engagement with the care team during treatment? Participants will: * Complete a demographic questionnaire at the beginning of the study and quality-of-life and health questionnaires at the beginning, midpoint, and end of study. * As feasible: At the beginning and end of the study, complete an in-person physical function assessment measuring balance (Short Physical Performance Battery). If participant is randomly assigned to the intervention group, they will also: * Complete weekly symptom ratings via digital remote patient monitoring tool * Wear a Fitbit activity tracker as feasible for 90 days. * At the end of the study, complete a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on the study.

The goal of this randomized controlled intervention is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the nurse-led with AI chatbot Individualized Symptom Management Education and Home-based Exercise (AI-ISME\&HE) based on The Theory of Symptom Self-Management (TSSM) on frailty, self-efficacy in cancer care, trAE, and quality of life in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can AI-ISME\&HE reduces frailty in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy? * Can AI-ISME\&HE increases quality of life in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy? * Can AI-ISME\&HE increases self-efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy? * Can AI-ISME\&HE reduces all-caused death in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy within two years? Researchers will compare usual routine care to see if AI-ISME\&HE can reduce frailty, all-caused death and increase quality of life and self-efficacy. Participants will not be blinded, but the outcome evaluator will be blinded. The participants will be asked to complete three tasks for 12 weeks: * Self-reporting treatment-related adverse events * Interacting with AI-ISME\&HE for seeking information related to self-management educational materials, including symptom management with the most reported trAEs and prevention from frailty * ViviFrail-based exercise

Introduction: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy have been recommended as the first-line treatment of driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the efficacy is worse in NSCLC patients with bone metastases due to the immunosuppressive microenvironment. Studies have shown that not only the nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitors but also Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) play a significant role in improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Therefore, narlumosbart，a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting RANKL，in combination with SBRT may have synergistic effects and improve efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in driver-negative advanced NSCLC patients with bone metastases. Methods: This single-arm, single-center phase II clinical trial will enroll NSCLC patients with bone metastases who have not received any systemic therapy. Patients will receive narlumosbart and bone target lesion SBRT in combination with first-line treatment immunotherapy and chemotherapy after screening eligible subjects. Narlumosbart, 120mg/time, subcutaneous injection, will be administered every 4 weeks. For the treatment of SBRT for bone metastases, the dose of 24Gy/3F is used for spinal metastases, and 30Gy/5F or 35Gy/5F is used for non-spinal lesions. Chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy will be used in accordance with the guidelines. The primary endpoint is to assess the objective response rate of NSCLC patients with bone metastases from narlumosbart combined with SBRT and first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, overall survival, bone-related events, pain score, and quality of life. Sample size was calculated using the Simon's Two-Stage method. 9 patients will be enrolled in the first stage. If ≥ 2 patients achieve CR/PR, the second stage of enrollment will be performed. If fewer than 2 patients achieve CR/PR, the trial will be terminated. In the second phase, 15 patients will be enrolled. 27 subjects will be enrolled in this project, considering the dropout rate of 10%. Wangjun Yan AND Zhengfei Zhu are the Co-Principal Investigators of this study.

This phase II, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study evaluates first-line ipilimumab N01 plus sintilimab and lenvatinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TFE3-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (TFE3-rRCC), a rare subtype lacking established first-line systemic therapy. Eligible patients (age ≥14 years, ECOG ≤2, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, no prior systemic therapy) will receive ipilimumab N01 1 mg/kg Q6W for 4 cycles, sintilimab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles, and lenvatinib 12 mg or 8 mg QD continuously. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety per NCI CTCAE v5.0, and quality of life. Exploratory biomarker analyses will assess potential predictors of treatment response.

Cancer treatment with immunotherapy is often associated with symptoms such as fatigue, pain, and emotional distress, which may affect patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Additional supportive care approaches are being studied to better understand their potential role in supporting these symptoms. The purpose of this study is to learn whether a biofield therapy, called Reiki may help to support adults with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy and currently struggling with fatigue. Reiki is a non-invasive complementary therapy delivered by a trained practitioner who places their hands lightly near the body. It is intended to promote relaxation and support general well-being. Reiki is used as a supportive practice and is not considered a medical treatment or replacement for standard care. The secondary goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of delivering Reiki in this clinical setting. This includes examining recruitment, retention, adherence to study procedures, and overall participant engagement. Lastly, the third aim is to explore participants' experiences with Reiki through guided interviews. Participants enrolled in this study will first be asked to participate in a one-hour, one-on-one interview about their experiences with cancer treatment, their symptoms, and their thoughts about integrative care practices such as Reiki. After the interview, they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Immediate Reiki Group: If participants are assigned to this group, they will receive six weekly, in-person 30-minute Usui Reiki sessions from a Reiki master at the Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute. Before and after each session, participants will complete questionnaires about fatigue, pain, and stress. At the first and final sessions, a small blood sample will be collected to measure inflammatory biomarkers, and Electroencephalogram (EEG) hyperscanning will be conducted to measure brain activity and connectivity between the participant and the practitioner. Four weeks after the final session, they will complete the questionnaires again, followed by a short satisfaction survey about their experience. Waitlist Group: If they are assigned to the waitlist group, they will first complete a 6-week observation period that includes brief weekly fatigue questionnaires and two in-person 30-minute sessions with EEG measurements at Week 1 and Week 6. This will be followed by a 4-week period with no sessions, after which they will complete questionnaires about fatigue, pain, and psychological distress. Participants will then begin the same six weekly, in-person 30-minute sessions described above. As with the Immediate Group, they will complete questionnaires before and after each session. At the first and final sessions, a small blood sample will be collected and EEG hyperscanning will be conducted. At the end of the study, participants will also complete a short satisfaction survey about their experience. The investigators hypothesize that participants receiving Reiki will report improvements in symptoms and well-being compared to those not yet receiving Reiki, and that the intervention will be feasible to implement and acceptable to participants.

This study will collect tumor specimens with correlated clinical and demographic data from patients who are undergoing a biopsy or similar procedure to obtain tumor tissue as a normal course of their medical management or diagnostic work-up for suspected or confirmed cancer.

This study is a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study in patients with advanced or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to establish a long-term survival (LTS) versus short-term survival (STS) real-world cohort, to systematically characterize the multi-omics landscapes, and to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) pathological prediction model based on routine H\&E-stained images for predicting immune microenvironment features and long-term survival outcomes following immunotherapy.

This study adopts a prospective randomized controlled design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy followed by sequential PD-1 inhibitor and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus conventional regimens in high-risk locally advanced pMMR/MSS lower rectal adenocarcinoma, aiming to provide high-level evidence supporting a novel treatment paradigm.

This project is about the effect of a 12-week training therapy intervention in patients suffering from non-small cell and small-cell lung cancer. It has widely been accepted that exercise is preventive against certain types of cancer. Individuals following an active lifestyle have a significantly lower risk for several chronic diseases, including cancer, as compared to sedentary ones. However, evidence is still lacking for exercise as part of routine cancer treatment. It has widely been accepted that exercise strongly impacts immune response, and might influence antitumor immune response as well. In this study, patients suffering from lung cancer undergo either a 12-week training program consisting of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE), or a 12-week program with high-intensity interval exercise. Both groups will be compared to a control group receiving standard exercise recommendations. The immunologic response, i.e. cytokine profiles and changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) characteristics will be the main endpoint. Blood will be taken from the patients at different timepoints, and blood samples will be tested for these immunologic changes. FACS analysis will be used to assess the properties of immune cells and potential changes upon the exercise regimen. Mitochondrial function will be assessed via the Seahorse machine, and mass spectrometry (lipidomics) will be used for the analysis of lipid profile changes.

This is an exploratory clinical study focusing on the neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study primarily aims to compare the efficacy and safety of Ivonescimab, a novel PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, with those of conventional PD-1 inhibitors. Beyond evaluating its direct therapeutic benefits, this research also seeks to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying the enhanced efficacy of Ivonescimab. Additionally, the study will conduct secondary exploratory analyses, including the identification and validation of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, as well as multi-omics profiling to investigate the molecular mechanisms of action. Collectively, these efforts aim to provide comprehensive experimental data to support the rational clinical application of Ivonescimab and the development of precision medicine strategies for NSCLC.

This is a prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QL1706 combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB1-IB3 cervical cancer undergoing conservative surgery. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 3-year pelvic recurrence rate, and safety profile. Additionally, exploratory biomarker analyses will be conducted to investigate changes in immune status, genomic alterations, PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, MSI-H/dMMR status, and vaginal microbiota before and after treatment.

This is a single-center, prospective, single-arm, open-label phase I exploratory study that plans to enroll 24 participants with solid malignancies. All participants will receive controlled cold exposure in addition to standard PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based standard combination therapy. A 2-day cold acclimation phase will precede formal intervention, consisting of approximately 20°C exposure for 8 hours on Day -2 and approximately 18°C exposure for 10 hours on Day -1. The first combination cycle begins on Day 1 concurrently with PD-1/PD-L1-based treatment, with exposure to an 18°C temperature-controlled hospital room for 12 hours per day for 7 consecutive days. If tolerated, cold exposure may be repeated in subsequent PD-1/PD-L1 treatment cycles. The primary objective is to evaluate safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Secondary objectives are to explore preliminary antitumor activity and the effects on brown adipose tissue activation, peripheral immune profiling, circulating cytokines, metabolomics, gut microbiota, patient-reported outcomes, and tumor immune/metabolic biomarkers when paired tumor tissue is available.

This study evaluates whether urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) testing, together with clinical, pathologic, and radiographic assessment, can help guide treatment discontinuation and active surveillance in patients with unresectable very-high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (VHR NMIBC) treated with bladder-sparing systemic immunotherapy. Participants receive systemic immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy every 3 weeks for an initial 3 cycles. Initial response assessment is performed using transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Participants without progression to muscle-invasive, regional nodal, or distant metastatic disease then undergo post-TURBT urine cytology and urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) testing. Participants with both negative urine cytology and negative utDNA results receive an additional 3 cycles of systemic immunotherapy. After the additional treatment, participants undergo repeat evaluation using cystoscopy with biopsy, urine cytology, utDNA testing, and chest and abdominopelvic CT. Participants with negative findings on cystoscopic biopsy, urine cytology, and utDNA testing, and without radiographic evidence of nodal or distant metastatic disease, discontinue systemic immunotherapy and enter an active surveillance phase with regular follow-up monitoring. Participants who do not meet these criteria continue further clinical management and follow-up according to institutional practice. The study aims to determine whether a shortened duration of systemic immunotherapy guided by integrated molecular, clinical, pathologic, and radiographic response assessment can maintain favorable oncologic outcomes while reducing unnecessary treatment exposure in this high-risk population.

This study is a national multicenter, prospective randomized, placebo- controlled Phase III clinical trial designed to investigate the potential therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy combined with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and to compare the efficacy of different radiotherapy modalities followed by immunotherapy.

This single-center, prospective, single-arm Phase II clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC, for up to 4 cycles) with iparomlimab/tuvonralimab plus bevacizumab followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who present with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) or extrahepatic oligometastatic disease. The study aims to determine whether this combination strategy can prolong progression-free survival (PFS), while also improving overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and local control rate (LCR), as well as maintaining quality of life (QoL). In addition, the trial will systematically evaluate the safety profile and treatment-related toxicities associated with this regimen.

By establishing a prospective clinical cohort for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and systematically collecting high-quality real-world data integrating clinical, imaging, pathological, and molecular dimensions, this study aims to enable personalized treatment for distinct SCLC subtypes. Furthermore, by evaluating the influence of radiotherapy timing, dose and fractionation, and target selection on efficacy and toxicity, we aim to identify the optimal radio-immunotherapy combination regimen that maximizes the synergistic effect in SCLC patients.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its early clinical manifestations are often subtle, leading to late-stage diagnosis in about 30% of cases with distant metastases. Liver metastases are widespread and associated with poor prognosis, especially in terms of response to immunotherapy. This prospective study will evaluate the efficacy of combined therapy involving sintilimab, fruquintinib, and radiotherapy in CRC with liver metastases. The primary objectives are to assess progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment response rates. This study aims to provide valuable insights into optimizing third-line and subsequent therapies for CRC with liver metastases by elucidating the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment approach.

During the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICIT), most of the patients stay at home, but there is lacking of the studies to explore their physical and psychological distress, financial toxicity, care needs, and quality of life. Therefore, the aims of this program are to (1) explore the immune-related adverse event (irAE) severity, distress, financial toxicity, and quality of life and examine the psychometric testing of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM); (2) establish the LINE group for assessing irAE severity and change trajectory of quality of life in one-year follow-up and (3) combined retrospective chart review and the finding in aim (2) to develop the risk prediction model in order to identify the high risk population.

This observational study will investigate how immunotherapy affects physical fitness, quality of life, and treatment tolerance in adults with solid cancers. Immunotherapy can cause a range of side effects that impact daily functioning and may lead to treatment delays or early discontinuation. Physical fitness may influence how well patients cope with treatment, yet little is known about how fitness changes during immunotherapy or whether baseline fitness is linked to outcomes. Participants will complete fitness testing using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and quality-of-life questionnaires before starting immunotherapy and again 12 weeks later. Blood samples will also be taken, and long-term outcomes including survival, disease progression, and quality of life will be followed for up to 24 months. All cancer treatment will remain standard of care. A small number of participants will be invited to take part in an optional research biopsy at week 12 to explore how physical fitness relates to changes in the tumour's immune environment. The study will help researchers understand natural changes in fitness during immunotherapy, identify whether baseline fitness is associated with treatment tolerance or outcomes, and generate information needed to design future trials testing exercise-based interventions during immunotherapy.