Interstitial Lung Disease Due to Connective Tissue Disease (Disorder)

The purpose of this study to find out whether giving BIO 300 in combination with thoracic radiation therapy is effective in preventing pneumonitis in people with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD).

This is a proof of concept study to determine if Emapalumab appears effective for the treatment of anti-MDA5 antibody positive rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (MDA5 RP-ILD). Emapalumab is a medication that is currently used for a severe problem with the immune system, called macrophage activation syndrome, and this disease shares some similar features with MDA5 RP-ILD.

The OXISITE-ILD study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study designed to evaluate the agreement between finger (digital) and earlobe (auricular) pulse oximetry for measuring oxygen saturation (SpO2) during the six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). In routine clinical practice, exercise SpO2 is usually measured at the finger; however, the finger reading can be unreliable in some patients, and there is currently no recommendation on the best sensor location in ILD. This study compares the two sensor locations, recorded at the same time, and evaluates whether any disagreement changes how exercise desaturation is classified and whether ambulatory oxygen is indicated. All patients undergoing a 6MWT as part of routine ILD care are included consecutively to ensure a pragmatic, real-world representation of the ILD population. The primary objective is to measure the agreement between the two locations in the lowest SpO2 reached during the test, including the size and direction of any difference. Secondary objectives include the reclassification of patients at the clinical desaturation thresholds, the comparison between autoimmune and non-autoimmune ILD, the rate of invalid readings at each location, and the clinical, vascular and functional factors associated with disagreement.

The OPTIMIZE-ILD-1 trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the impact of a coordinated diagnostic pathway on patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD). In routine clinical practice, diagnostic workflows for ILD are frequently fragmented, involving multiple independent appointments that can lead to significant delays and increased burden for patients and caregivers. This study compares the standard diagnostic pathway against an optimized circuit where core diagnostic procedures-such as high-resolution CT, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory panels-are pre-bundled and scheduled within a coordinated and compressed timeframe. All eligible patients referred for suspected ILD are included consecutively to ensure a pragmatic, real-world representation of the referral population. The primary objective is to measure the time to diagnostic communication, defined as the duration from randomization to the date the patient is formally informed of the final diagnosis following a multidisciplinary team (MDT) consensus. Secondary objectives include assessing the time to MDT diagnosis, the time to treatment initiation (when clinically indicated), socioeconomic cost-burden, and the environmental carbon footprint of the diagnostic journey. Furthermore, the study evaluates health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and clinical frailty, while exploring factors such as language proficiency as determinants of diagnostic equity. Caregiver-related outcomes, including burden and experience measures, are contingent upon the presence of a primary caregiver and the provision of their independent informed consent. The design of this protocol was informed by a patient focus group and is officially endorsed by the 'AIRE' Associació Catalana de Malalts i Trasplantats Pulmonars, ensuring a patient-centered approach that prioritizes the diagnostic journey's efficiency and human impact.

The OPTIMIZE-ILD-2 trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the impact of a coordinated follow-up pathway on patients with established interstitial lung disease (ILD). In routine clinical practice, follow-up workflows for ILD are frequently fragmented, requiring multiple hospital visits for pulmonary function tests, laboratory analysis, treatment administration, and consultations with various specialists, which increases the burden for both patients and caregivers. This study compares the standard follow-up care against an optimized circuit where all routine monitoring procedures and interdisciplinary consultations are pre-bundled and scheduled within a single, coordinated hospital visit. All eligible patients under active ILD follow-up are included consecutively to ensure a pragmatic, real-world representation of the treated ILD population. The primary objective is to measure the total follow-up time burden, defined as the total home-to-home time required to complete the follow-up circuit. As a cross-sectional assessment within a longitudinal context, secondary objectives include assessing socioeconomic cost-burden, the environmental carbon footprint of the follow-up journey, health-related quality of life, and clinical frailty. Caregiver-related outcomes, including burden and experience measures, are contingent upon the presence of a primary caregiver and the provision of their independent informed consent. The design of this protocol was informed by a patient focus group and is officially endorsed by the 'AIRE' Associació Catalana de Malalts i Trasplantats Pulmonars, ensuring a patient-centered approach that prioritizes follow-up efficiency and human impact.