Malignant Tumor

This clinical trial evaluates whether adding spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) to standard palliative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) improves disease-related symptoms in patients with solid tumors that cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable). SFRT, originally termed GRID therapy, is a radiation therapy technique designed to deliver a highly uneven dose of radiation to a tumor. This is achieved by using a grid-like pattern, where isolated regions receive high doses, while the spaces between experience significantly lower doses. This method allows for a greater total dose to be delivered to the tumor while potentially reducing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. EBRT is a type of radiation therapy that uses a machine to aim high-energy rays at the cancer from outside of the body. Adding SFRT to standard palliative EBRT may improve disease-related symptoms such as pain, difficulty breathing, bleeding, or difficulty swallowing in patients with unresectable solid tumors.

The goal of this clinical trial is to establish a multimodal prehabilitation protocol suitable for patients with tumor-related bowel obstruction during the perioperative period, and to explore its safety and efficacy; to evaluate the impact of this protocol on short-term and long-term clinical outcomes and recovery indicators.The participants will be divided into two groups. The experimental group will receive an integrated program of preoperative multi-modal pre-rehabilitation intervention combined with postoperative immune nutrition support; the control group will receive traditional perioperative management for intestinal obstruction.

This study is a Compassionate clinical study for the treatment of Malignant Tumors. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the frequency, severity and causality of acute adverse events related to the DaRT treatment. Adverse events will be assessed and graded according to Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The secondary endpoint is to assess the tumor response to DaRT treatment assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.1) 3 months after DaRT seed insertion.

Advanced solid tumors remain a major therapeutic challenge due to their complex heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Although cancer vaccines are designed to induce long-lasting antitumor immunity, their efficacy is often limited by the TME's immune-evasive mechanisms. Building on this rationale, investigators developed a novel vaccine comprising irradiated tumor cells and stromal cells isolated from adjacent non-cancerous tissues or tumor tissues in combination with adjuvant. Irradiated tumor cells in vaccines such as YMN102, YMN103, YMN104, YMN105, YMN106, and YMN107 are transfected with GM-CSF; the others, such as YMN101 and YMN108, are not transfected with GM-CSF. Preclinical studies across multiple tumor models have demonstrated potent antitumor activity with no significant toxicity observed following administration. This first-in-human Phase I study is designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this irradiated vaccine in patients with advanced solid tumors, alongside a preliminary assessment of its antitumor activity and immunogenic profile. This is a first-in-human, Phase I, open-label study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this novel vaccine. The study includes multiple arms targeting specific malignancies, including osteosarcoma, pancreatic cancer, HNSCC, colorectal cancer, HCC, glioma, and TNBC. The primary objective is to determine the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include assessing the objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) per RECIST v1.1. Exploratory analyses will monitor dynamic changes in circulating biomarkers and intratumoral immune modulation to identify potential predictive markers of clinical response.

Purpose Ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2) is a receptor tyrosine kinase overexpressed in various solid tumors and associated with tumor progression, metastasis, and poor prognosis. However, noninvasive imaging tools for assessing EphA2 expression in vivo remain limited. This study aims to develop a novel 68Ga-labeled EphA2-targeting positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for specific imaging of EphA2-positive malignancies.

This pilot health services interventional study aims to prospectively assess the effectiveness of a pre-treatment rehabilitation (prehabilitation) program across a diverse cohort of adult cancer patients via a randomized pilot trial. Upon screening and identification of high-risk features through a central navigation process, patients referred to oncology clinics will be approached to participate in tailored prehabilitation interventions. The study will track and analyze functional outcomes and quality of life aiming to demonstrate the comprehensive benefits of prehabilitation on the cancer treatment continuum. We hypothesize that this referral program is feasible and that those randomized to the intervention arm will have superior functional outcomes and global health-related quality of life. The rationale for this study is anchored in the urgent need to optimize the cancer care trajectory for high-risk patients whose treatment outcomes and quality of life are jeopardized by the multifaceted challenges of their disease. While prehabilitation has shown potential to mitigate these adverse effects, the optimal methods for identifying and connecting these high-risk individuals to appropriate prehabilitation resources remain underexplored. This study, with its systematic approach to enrolling a diverse adult cancer population, endeavors to investigate not only the benefits of prehabilitation interventions but also the effectiveness of a targeted referral process. By doing so, it aims to uncover novel strategies for efficiently allocating prehabilitation resources, thereby enhancing the precision and impact of supportive cancer care.

This prospective, single-center study investigates the biodistribution, dosimetry, safety, diagnostic performance of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI PET imaging in patients with malignant tumor,cardiovascular or immune disease. And evaluates the potential of Al18F-NOTA-FAPI PET imaging in Clinical treatment strategy guidance.

This health services interventional study investigates the effectiveness of central oncology navigation (SOC ) alone and central oncology navigation with a new role called an "oncology research navigator (ORN)" who is embedded in central oncology navigation cancer care delivery. This study will examine two patient cohorts: Cohort 1 will enroll patients with new cancer appointments within genitourinary (GU) or thoracic cancers. These clinics have not yet implemented the central navigation program. Participants will be enrolled pre- and post-implementation of the central oncology navigator within these cancer groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the central oncology navigator alone. The second cohort will enroll participants with new cancer appointments within gastrointestinal (GI), hematology, and breast cancer (clinics where the central navigation program was implemented). These individuals will be randomized to receive standard of care, which for these cancer types includes central oncology navigation or the intervention of an oncology research navigator in addition to SOC. This intervention will involve baseline and biweekly follow-up for a total of 3 months. Interactions with the ORN will include facilitating participation in supportive care services and clinical trials. All participants will undergo baseline and follow-up patient-reported outcomes and data collection. The study will evaluate the impact of the central oncology navigation program alone, as well as the addition of the ORN on patient quality of life, as well as enrollment into studies and participation in supportive care services. Additional analyses will evaluate the impact of the central oncology navigation program on patient experience, patient activation, net promoter scores, and overall survival.

This is a Phase 1/2a, first-in-human, open-label study of JAB-8263, this study has two parts: solid tumor dose escalation and expansion study and hematology tumor dose escalation and expansion study. These two parts will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and assess the DLT of JAB-8263 in treatment with patients with advanced solid tumors and hematology tumors separately. 30 subjects each will be enrolled.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the Psychological Distress in Malignant Tumor Patients about Effects on Treatment Adherence, Outcomes, and Quality of Life. The main question it aims to answer is: Does Psychological Distress affect Malignant Tumor Patients' Effects on Treatment Adherence, Outcomes, and Quality of Life? Malignant Tumor Patients with or without Psychological Distress will answer GAD-7 and PHQ-9 and their Treatment Adherence, Outcomes, and Quality of Life be recorded for 3 years.

In this study, we collected the data of immunohistochemistry, gene detection, image, OS, PFS, Orr, and so on. Secondly, the database of immunotherapy for malignant tumor was established, and the predictive model was constructed to verify and establish the rationality and validity of the biomarkers and predictive system of immunotherapy

The purpose of this trial is to understand the impact of a family empowerment-based intervention program on family caregivers' readiness to care and ability to care. It aims to elucidate whether a health education intervention program based on the Family Empowerment Model improves family caregivers' readiness for care and ability to care. Participants will receive a health education program based on the family empowerment model and will complete questionnaires three days prior to admission, during hospitalization, and three days prior to discharge.This study is a non-pharmacological intervention and will not involve any changes in treatment or chemotherapy regimens.

This is a single-center, prospective, real-world observational study designed to enroll all patients eligible for enrollment. Basic data, treatment methods, postoperative complications and limb function were collected. The differences in postoperative complications, postoperative limb function and so on between patients who underwent LARS ligament implantation and bone prosthesis replacement (ligament group) and patients who underwent bone prosthesis replacement (control group) were compared.

To report the patients who underwent 3D-printed bone prosthesis replacement in Henan Cancer Hospital in the next 10 years, and collect the postoperative complications and limb function of these patients.

This study was a single-center prospective, real-world observational study with plans to enroll all eligible patients. The basic information, anxiety and depression, treatment and prognosis of these patients were collected.