Melanoma (Skin)

This is a phase II, open label clinical trial determining efficacy of Fianlimab in combination with Cemiplimab in subjects with Melanoma. These are subjects who will have surgery to remove their cancer.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether high-intensity exercise and high-fiber diet are feasible and improve various health outcomes among participants with advanced melanoma receiving immunotherapy. The names of the groups in this research study are: * High-Intensity Exercise (EX) * High-fiber Diet (DT) * Combined High-Intensity Exercise and High-Fiber Diet (COMB) * Attention Control (AC)

The purpose of this study is to help prevent skin cancer by improving the use of sun protective behaviors among youths living in rural communities in Utah and West Virginia.

To learn if giving nivolumab in combination with relatlimab can help to control melanoma that has spread to the brain (melanoma with brain metastases). The safety and side effects of the study drug combination will also be studied.

The goal of this study is to observe metabolic features associated with human melanoma tumors.

This study is being conducted to explore the immunological mechanism of action of Peptide-coated Conditionally Replicating Adenovirus-1 (PeptiCRAd-1) plus Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy in multiple cancer types, as well as to obtain early information on the safety of this combination therapy.

This is a phase 2, single-arm, open label clinical trial determining efficacy of Cyclophosphamide and Pembrolizumab in subjects with melanoma.

This study is a Phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of HMBD-501 in patients with advanced-stage, relapsed and/or refractory human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3)-expressing solid tumors. The study consists of 2 phases: a dose escalation phase (Phase 1) and a dose expansion phase (Phase 2). The primary objectives of Phase 1 are to characterize the overall safety and tolerability profile of increasing doses of HMBD-501 in patients with advanced-stage solid tumors and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ENV-501. During Phase 1, successive cohorts of patients will receive escalating doses of HMBD-501. The results of the dose escalation will determine the RP2D and dosing schedule of HMBD-501 to be administered in the Phase 2 part of the study. The primary objective of Phase 2 is to evaluate the preliminary clinical efficacy of HMBD-501 in dose expansion cohorts.

Among the mechanisms responsible for resistance to immunotherapy, metabolism seems to play a major role. A better understanding of tumor metabolism appears to be absolutely necessary in order to propose efficient therapeutic alternatives to target tumor cells without exerting a deleterious effect on the cells responsible for the anti-tumor immune response. The main objective is to evaluate metabolism modulations in melanoma cells extracted from metastases of patients sensitive and resistant to immunotherapies (anti-PD1 or anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4).

Rationale: The randomized trial NADINA has demonstrated that neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab with ipilimumab improves event-free survival (EFS) in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma. In this study, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) was standard of care, showing that patients achieving a major pathological response (MPR, i.e., ≤10% residual viable tumor bed) have an excellent outcome (EFS and Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS)). The PRADO trial indicated that the MPR definition can also be revealed from a surrogate lymph node response, the index lymph node (ILN), allowing sparing the extensive surgery in MPR patients. In these MPR patients the DMFS was 100% after 1 year and 98% after 2 years, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95% after 1 year and 93% after 2 years. Given that TLND is associated with morbidity and has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and healthcare costs, this study aims to prospectively investigate the safety of omitting TLND in patients who have an MPR within the ILN after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Objectives: To investigate whether TLND can be safely omitted in patients with macroscopic resectable stage III (B/C/D) melanoma achieving an MPR within the ILN upon neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab and nivolumab). Study design: This study is a prospective, single-arm phase 2 nationwide multicenter trial. Study population: Inclusion criteria for study participants are as follows: * Patients must be eligible for neoadjuvant treatment * Patients must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of macroscopic resectable stage III melanoma (stage III B/C/D) with one or more macroscopic lymph node metastasis * The patient must have a measurable tumor burden that qualifies (according to clinical practice) for neoadjuvant therapy Intervention: Omitting TLND in patients who achieve an MPR in the ILN following neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab. Main study endpoints: The two coprimary endpoints are 2-year Local Recurrence Free Survival (LRFS) and 2-year DMFS.

With a high incidence, low survival rates and limiter availability of effective treatment, melanoma is one of the research priorities for health authorities. Optimizing the development of both academic and private research requires the availability information on the features of patients. To meet this need, the French Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GMFMel) in collaboration with INCa (French National Cancer Institute), the CeNGEPS (National Centre for Healthcare Products Trial Management) and the CIC-BT0503 from Nantes University Hospital (Biotherapy Clinical Centre of Investigation) has set up in April 2011 a Clinical Investigation Network for melanoma, called the CeNGEPS-GMFMel network. Nowadays, the network is named : RIC-Mel : network for Research and Clinical Investigation on Melanoma. Aims of the network are to promote translational and epidemiological projects as well as to optimize the achievements of clinical trials. To achieve these goals, a database was launched in 2012 that gives a permanently updates mapping of melanoma treated in France with the key information needed for any research projects.

A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the digital personalised Melanoma Survivorship Care Plan (SCP) app. A total of hundred-eighty melanoma patients (stage I and II) will be randomised to receive either the SCP Melanoma app or usual care. The app provides survivors with personalized healthcare information on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up and supportive care, tailored to their melanoma stage and phase and information needs.Through questionnaires, medical file records, patient-reported outcomes and use of medical care will be evaluated. In addition, log-data, questionnaires and interviews will be used to evaluate the process of the uptake and implementation of the digital SCP.

In recent years, the prognosis for BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma has been transformed with targeted therapies combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib-trametinib and encorafenib-cobimetinib), which have improved progression-free survival and overall survival. However, adverse events are very frequent, and a significant proportion of patients progress secondarily. Several clinical studies have shown that inter-individual variability in plasma exposure to BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib, vemurafenib) or MEK inhibitors (trametinib) may contribute in part to the occurrence of severe toxicities, and on the efficiency of the treatment. To our knowledge, no data are currently available on the exposure/toxicity relationship for encorafenib and binimetinib. The aim of this study is to assess the association between plasma exposure of encorafenib and binimetinib and the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity during the first 3 months of treatment. Our secondary objectives are the identification of factors of variability in plasma exposure to encorafenib and binimetinib, the assessment of the exposure-response relationship to treatment (PFS, OS), the evaluation of the influence of the residual plasma concentration of checkpoint inhibiting antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab) in the first month on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity during treatment with encorafenib/binimetinib. Also, the investigators will study the relationship between the kinetics of circulating tumour DNA levels and plasma exposure to encorafenib and binimetinib. Finally, the investigators will assess compliance with treatment. All patients over the age of 18 receiving encorafenib-binimetib for BRAF-mutated metastatic or locally advanced non-operable melanoma, regardless of line, in our 5 centres, will be included. After the patient has been informed and informed that he or she does not wish to be included in the study, an additional blood test will be taken during follow-up visits to the HDJ or specific follow-up consultation for his or her metastatic melanoma, where blood sampling is already planned as part of the treatment, during 1 year. The tubes will be sent to the laboratories for analysis in the usual way as part of routine care. A self-questionnaire will be given to the patient at different follow-up visits. Research data, including clinical, biological and self-questionnaire data, will be collected in the study via a web interface (e-CRF). Follow-up of the population will follow the rhythm of visits scheduled as part of the usual care of patients with melanoma undergoing targeted therapy. the investigators plan a 1-year sampling period, and a 2-year clinical follow-up period for each patient from the time of inclusion. Finally, the investigators plan a period of 1 year to analyze the data and write the article. Statistical analysis will be carried out by the investigating team (R software).

The goal of this observational study is to assess whether the IOpener® melanoma test can assist treating physicians in deciding which therapy is most suitable for patients with skin cancer (advanced cutaneous melanoma). For this purpose it is evaluated how well the IOpener-melanoma test can predict the result of cancer treatment in the treatment groups (standard of care anti-PD1 mono-therapy and standard of care anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA-4 therapy). Participants will be asked to provide blood sample for analysis using IOpener®-melanoma test. Patients will receive regular medical care, the test results will not be used to make any treatment decisions. The patients will visit the clinic for treatment administration and clinical evaluation as part of their regular medical care.

The primary objective of this study is to identify the molecular identity profiles of all cellular states that characterize the progression from benign nevi to malignant melanoma in CAYA patients with L/GCMN. The secondary objectives are: * To longitudinally characterize the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from CAYA patients. * To improve the early diagnosis and treatments for intermediate conditions such as L/GCMN through evidence-based interpretation of personal risk from endogenous or exogenous sources. * To test pre-clinical strategies to best model and improve patient response.

Studies have shown that tumors from the same patient may respond very differently to the same therapeutic agents. This study aims to investigate the genetic basis of tumors that respond abnormally well or poorly to therapeutic agents in an effort to understand the fundamental genetic basis of this response. The present protocol seeks to retrospectively perform Exome, next-generation (DNA) sequencing and/or other molecular techniques on tumor samples to identify the genetic basis of a patient's exceptional response to chemotherapy.

The trial will test a paradigm-changing in vitro diagnostic device for Liquid Biopsy enabling facile simultaneous detection of protein and nucleic acid analytes with sensitivity at single-molecule level, e.g. not achievable with any alternative technology. A novel affinity-mediated transport amplification (AMT) method will be tested allowing for the multiplexed quantification of rare biomarkers circulating in blood. The Versilib AMT photonic biosensor will test two analytes: the known actionable DNA mutation BRAF p.V600E, and a melanoma-restricted protein antigen. The results will be compared to digital PCR and ELISA methods.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity of the DermaSensor device and Investigators when used on skin lesions concerning for melanoma.

Checkpoint inhibitor such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 are known to block inhibitory signals and increase the immune antimutoral response. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab association is considered as a more efficient immunotherapy to treat advanced melanoma. This combined immunotherapy is also responsible of severe immunes toxicyties. Identification of predictives biomarqueurs remains a challenge to predict the balance between tolerability and efficency. Previous data showed that advanced melanoma patient had lower level of Th1 cytokines that predict a less efficient immune system than healthy donors. The second point was that high level of Th1 and Th17 cytokines were correlate to a better tumor response. The last point was that patients with severe immune toxicity showed an increase of IL-6 and IL17a production. The investigators would like to identify the predictive values of Th1, Th2 and Th17 at the begining and during the combined immunotherapy and correlate these cytokines levels secretions to a potential efficient tumor response or to the emergence of induced immunes toxicities. This study is an original approach using functionnal test to predict the balance between efficienty and tolerability.