Neurogenic Bowel

The goal of the study is to find out which of three different options (a suppository, a mini enema, or a transanal irrigation device) takes the least amount of time for completing bowel program amongst those who have spinal cord injuries with a neurogenic bowel. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Does one of these tools meaningfully reduce the amount of time people with spinal cord injury need to complete their bowel programs? * Does one of these tools meaningfully reduce the number of times someone might experience incontinence or constipation? * Are participants satisfied in using these devices, and would they prefer to use the same tool at home? Researchers will compare the answers to these questions between the three different tools to improve quality of life for patients while improving the efficiency of the care provided. Participants in this study will: * Be enrolled in one of these options depending on when they are admitted to Casa Colina Hospital * Will receive the same tool for their bowel program for the majority or entirety of their stay * Will have a tracking sheet placed in their rooms for nursing to record when bowel program started and when it was completed * Will receive questionnaires when they enroll and when they finish the study on their experience with the tool and how likely they would be to use it at home

The goal of this observational study is to learn how different enema programs affect bowel control in children and adults with spina bifida. An enema program involves putting liquid into the large intestine (colon) to help someone poop. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How well do different enema programs prevent bowel accidents? 2. How do these enema programs affect independence, bowel symptoms, and quality of life? Researchers will compare two types of enema programs to see which works better and is easier for participants to manage. Participants starting a new enema program will answer online survey questions at 3 different timepoints over the course of 1 year.

The primary objective of this study is to gather information about the effectiveness of abdominal FES to improve bowel management time (BMT) for people with chronic SCI. This study will also evaluate whether abdominal FES can improve: 1) bowel-related quality of life, 2) participant-reported bowel function, 3) bowel management strategy, 4) bladder symptoms, and 5) unplanned hospital admissions. In addition, we will also explore participant perspectives and experiences about the stimulation sessions and use of the device.

The investigators will recruit up to 20 volunteers with chronic, supra-sacral SCI. Following screening, eligible participants will enter 'Phase I', they will complete baseline outcome measures and then have the epidural spinal cord stimulator (eSCS) implanted with either percutaneous or paddle electrodes. Preoperative and intraoperative testing will determine exact location of electrodes. Mapping and optimisation of stimulation parameters will be performed simultaneously with urodynamic investigations of bladder function, and anorectal physiology investigations of bowel function. The acute effects of eSCS to suppress bladder overactivity, facilitate voiding, prevent unwanted reflex sphincter activity, and pelvic floor function will guide development of eSCS programmes for use at home. In 'Phase II', participants will use eSCS at home for 12-weeks. Participants will also be taught how to perform bladder and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in combination with eSCS. Outcome measures assessing bladder, bowel, sexual function, quality of life, motor function and spasticity will be captured prior to and following the 12-week intervention, and at 3 and 6 month follow up.

The primary goals of this pilot trial are to understand the feasibility and safety of thoracolumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for neurogenic bowel management in individuals with new onset, traumatic, cervicothoracic spinal cord injury admitted to inpatient rehabilitation. The secondary goal is to understand the clinical impact of thoracolumbar spinal cord stimulation on bowel function. Study participants will receive a 10-day course of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation at T10-T11 and T12-L1. Each daily treatment will consist of 30 minutes of stimulation. Feasibility will be evaluated by documenting how many stimulation sessions were attended per participant, and the average duration of stimulation provided per session (with a maximum value of 30 minutes). It is believed that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be feasible to deliver for participants receiving inpatient rehabilitation. Safety will be evaluated by documenting hemodynamic parameters (heart and blood pressure) and pain levels during each stimulation session. The skin will be evaluated after treatment to ensure no pressure injuries. Participants will be asked to document bladder continence before and after the two-week stimulation protocol, to understand if there are any changes on bladder function, given similar nerve root innervation as bowel function. Investigators expect that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be safe, with minimal adverse effects on heart, blood pressure, skin integrity, pain levels and bladder continence. The impact on bowel function will be evaluated by completing a bowel diary documenting the time spent on bowel care per day per participant. Participants will also rate their satisfaction with bowel care before, immediately after and two weeks after the 10-day stimulation protocol. Peak cough flow will be collected before, immediately after and two weeks after the 10-day stimulation protocol, as surrogate measures of abdominal strength, which is important for timely bowel evacuation. It is believed that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will reduce time spent on bowel care and improve participant-reported satisfaction with bowel care, and it will be associated with improvements in peak cough flow.