Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TROPION-Lung17 will measure the efficacy and safety of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) compared with docetaxel in patients with trophoblast cell surface protein 2 (TROP2) positive advanced or metastatic lung cancer without actionable genomic alterations (AGA).

The primary objectives are to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants who receive sotorasib with platinum doublet chemotherapy versus participants who receive pembrolizumab with platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. The first treatment is usually chemotherapy, given with another treatment that targets specific proteins on cancer cells. If the cancer gets worse, the next main treatment is usually a medicine called docetaxel. This treatment doesn't stop most people's cancer from getting worse for very long. Other treatments are needed to improve outcomes in people with NSCLC. Genes give your body instructions on how to make proteins. Proteins are needed to keep the body working properly. Many types of cancer are caused by changes in certain genes, making them faulty. Many people with NSCLC have a faulty KRAS gene in their tumor. One such change in the KRAS gene is called a G12D mutation. Researchers are looking for ways to stop the actions of abnormal proteins made from the KRAS G12D mutation. Setidegrasib (ASP3082) is thought to remove some of the abnormal proteins made from the faulty KRAS gene. Before setidegrasib can become available as a treatment, studies need to be done. This study is for people with NSCLC with a faulty KRAS gene in their tumor. In this study, some people will be given setidegrasib and some people will be given docetaxel. The main aims are to learn how long people who are given setidegrasib live with cancer without it getting worse, compared to people who are given docetaxel, and if they live for longer. Other aims are to check tumor response, symptoms, how the body processes setidegrasib, and its safety, compared with docetaxel. The main aims of study are to learn how long people who are given setidegrasib live with cancer without it getting worse, compared to people who are given docetaxel and if people who are given setidegrasib live for longer compared to people who are given docetaxel. People in this study will be adults with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the G12D mutation in their KRAS gene. Locally advanced means the cancer has spread to nearby tissue. Unresectable means the cancer cannot be removed by surgery. Metastatic means the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. They have had no more than 2 previous treatments for their cancer. The key reasons people cannot take part are if they have different faulty genes in their tumor which can be targeted with other treatments, have symptomatic or untreated cancers that have spread from the lung into the brain or nervous system, their cancer has spread to the thin tissue that covers the brain and spinal cord (leptomeningeal disease), or they have recently had other active cancers that required treatment. In this study, people will either receive setidegrasib or docetaxel. Whether people receive setidegrasib or docetaxel is decided by chance, not by the study doctor. Both study treatments are given slowly through a tube into a vein (infusion). People will continue to receive study treatment until their cancer gets worse, they can't tolerate the study treatment, they start other cancer treatment, they or the doctor decides the person should stop receiving study treatment, or sadly, they pass away. Some people on docetaxel may be able to switch to setidegrasib during the study if their cancer becomes worse. There will be safety checks at each visit, and the doctors will continue to check for medical problems and people's wellbeing throughout the study. People will continue to have scans of their tumor every 6 weeks for the first year, then every 9 weeks until their cancer becomes worse. After people's cancer becomes worse, clinic staff will telephone people every 12 weeks to check on their cancer.

This Phase 2 study will be conducted in different countries around the world with up to about 240 participants. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well Rina-S works against lung cancer. The treatment in this study is Rina-S monotherapy (by itself). All participants will receive active drug; no one will be given placebo. The treatment duration will be different for every participant, but an average of 12 months is expected. Participants will be asked to attend 1 to 5 visits at the study clinic for each cycle (duration of cycle is 3 weeks). If a participant's cancer stays the same or gets better, and there are not any serious problems, participants can keep getting study treatment for as long as the study is open. Participation in the study will require visits to the study site(s). During site visits, there will be various tests (such as blood draws) and procedures (such as recording of heart activity, imaging/X-rays) to monitor whether the study treatment is safe and effective.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Pumitamig versus Pembrolizumab in participants with previously untreated advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and PD-L1 ≥ 50%.

A study to evaluate Pumitamig versus Durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiation therapy in participants with unresectable stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

This is a proof-of-concept study designed to investigate HER3-DXd monotherapy in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumors. The study is enrolling cohorts of participants with melanoma \[cutaneous/acral\], squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN), HER2-negative gastric cancer ovarian carcinoma, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, prostate cancer, second-line gastric cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer.

This is a multicenter Phase 1b, open label, dose-escalation and cohort-expansion study, evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary antitumor activity, and effect of biomarkers of zanzalintinib administered alone, and in combination with nivolumab (doublet), nivolumab + ipilimumab (triplet) and nivolumab + relatlimab (triplet) and in combination with docetaxel and prednisone in participants with advanced solid tumors. In addition, the study will evaluate the effect of multiple dose administration of zanzalintinib on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of sensitive CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP1A2 substrates in participants with advanced solid tumors. In the Expansion Stage, the safety and efficacy of zanzalintinib as monotherapy and in combination therapy will be further evaluated in tumor-specific Expansion Cohorts.

This is a multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of IDE892 as monotherapy and in combination with other agents including IDE397 in participants with methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-deleted advanced solid tumors within indications of interest.

The primary objective of the study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypothesis is that the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab alone with respect to OS.

Study to investigate the effect of ponsegromab on skeletal muscle mass and physical function in adult participants with non-small cell lung cancer associated cachexia.

This is an open-label, multicenter Phase Ib/II clinical study evaluating GFH276 in combination with tislelizumab plus pemetrexed/platinum based regimen as first-line therapy in participants with locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring RAS mutation or KRAS amplification.

Genes give your body instructions on how to make proteins. Proteins are needed to keep the body working properly. Many types of cancer are caused by changes in certain genes, making them faulty. Some people with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a faulty ALK gene. ALK stands for anaplastic lymphoma kinase. People with NSCLC who have the faulty ALK gene are called ALK-positive. ALK inhibitors are an approved treatment for people with ALK positive NSCLC. Some people stop responding to treatment with ALK inhibitors over time due to more changes happening in their faulty ALK gene, so there is an unmet medical need. Gilteritinib is an approved treatment for people with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the faulty FLT3 gene who haven't responded to previous treatment, or their cancer came back after previous treatment. Gilteritinib also blocks changes in the ALK gene which could help people with ALK-positive NSCLC. A study needs to be done with gilteritinib in people with ALK-positive NSCLC. The main aim of the study is to check the safety of gilteritinib in people with ALK-positive NSCLC and if they tolerate gilteritinib. People in this study will be adults with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Locally advanced means the cancer has spread to nearby tissue. Metastatic means the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. They have stopped responding to treatment with ALK inhibitors, including alectinib or lorlatinib, over time. The key reasons people cannot take part are if they have symptomatic cancers in the brain or nervous system, their cancer has spread to the thin tissue that covers the brain and spinal cord (leptomengingeal metastasis), have recently had or planning to have major surgery, have certain heart conditions, or have recently had an infection, a stroke or mini-stroke. People in the study will take tablets of gilteritinib once a day in a 28-day cycle. They may be given up to 2 different doses of gilteritinib. People in the study will start on the lower dose but can eventually switch to the higher dose if they tolerate the lower dose and meet the safety checks. Whilst taking gilteritinib, people will have regular scans of their tumors. People will continue taking gilteritinib until their cancer gets worse, they have medical problems from gilteritinib that they can't tolerate, they ask to stop taking gilteritinib, they start other cancer treatment or, sadly pass away. People will visit the clinic about 7 days and then 30 days after they stop taking gilteritinib. They will be asked about any medical problems and will have a safety check. After this, people who stopped taking gilteritinib, but their cancer hadn't become worse, will continue to have regular scans of their tumors. If their cancer does get worse, they will no longer have scans of their tumors. After finishing gilteritinib, people will be phoned every 12 weeks to check on their health. People will be in the study for up to 4 years, depending on how they respond to gilteritinib.

This study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK profiles of Elironrasib and Daraxonrasib as monotherapies and combination therapy in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors.

Evaluate the safety and tolerability of BPI-572270 in adult patients with specific RAS mutant advanced solid tumors.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity of RMC-5127 as a monotherapy and in combination with either daraxonrasib or cetuximab in adults with KRAS G12V-mutant solid tumors.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic activity of GI-108, as a single agent, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of a home-based prehabilitation program using wireless wearable monitoring devices in older patients (aged 65-85 years) with non-small cell lung cancer scheduled for curative lung resection. Participants are randomized 1:1 to either the intervention group, receiving a personalized exercise regimen (aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training) with continuous remote monitoring of steps, heart rate, and SpO₂ from 2-4 weeks preoperatively through 90 days postoperatively, or the control group receiving standard perioperative care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in FEV₁% predicted at 90 days post-surgery, adjusted for baseline. Secondary endpoints include functional capacity (6-minute walk distance), daily physical activity, hypoxemic burden (time with SpO₂\<90%, nocturnal oxygen desaturation index), patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC13, mMRC), postoperative complications, readmission rates, days alive and at home, and safety outcomes. The target sample size is 198 participants enrolled at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Anticipated risks include exercise-related musculoskeletal strain, fatigue, and transient cardiopulmonary symptoms, as well as mild skin reactions from devices, all managed through individualized exercise prescriptions, remote safety thresholds, and a graded response protocol.

This study aims to develop and evaluate an integrated perioperative management system based on wearable devices and a digital rehabilitation platform for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing thoracic surgery. By combining preoperative functional assessment using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), continuous perioperative physiological monitoring, and structured postoperative home-based digital rehabilitation, this randomized controlled trial will investigate whether the wearable-based digital management model improves short-term postoperative pulmonary function, functional recovery, and clinical outcomes compared with standard perioperative care.

The goal of this First-In-Human (FIH) Phase I/II trial is to establish the safety profile, determine the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D), explore the pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties as well as assess the efficacy of STX-241/PFL-241, a mutant selective Central Nervous System (CNS)-penetrant fourth generation EGFR TKI, in participants with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC that progressed during or following third generation EGFR TKI such as osimertinib due to C797X double acquired (secondary) mutations.

This is a prospective, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether a digital rehabilitation program integrated with wireless wearable continuous monitoring devices can shorten the time to functional recovery in patients with multiple primary non-small cell lung cancer (MPLC) who undergo sequential (two-stage) curative-intent resection. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Both groups will receive standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) care. In addition, the intervention group will receive continuous vital sign monitoring (using a wearable patch during hospitalization and a wrist-worn device after discharge), personalized exercise prescriptions with daily step targets, and high-frequency electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up with threshold-triggered response. The control group will receive standard intermittent vital sign monitoring and conventional rehabilitation education. The primary endpoint is the time from the first surgery to attainment of functional recovery criteria sufficient for second-stage surgery readiness (assessed by a composite of step count recovery, functional interference score combined with 6-minute walk distance, or multidisciplinary team determination). Secondary endpoints include pulmonary function recovery (FEV1%, FVC%, DLCO% at 3 months), physical activity (daily steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, 6-minute walk distance), symptom burden and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC13, PROMIS), 30- and 90-day complication and readmission rates, second-surgery-related outcomes, adherence, safety, and healthcare resource utilization. A total of 222 participants (111 per group) will be enrolled. The study will be conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2026 to October 2027. The findings are expected to provide high-quality evidence on the clinical utility of wearable-integrated digital rehabilitation in the perioperative management of MPLC patients undergoing sequential resection.

This is a prospective, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial evaluating whether a wireless wearable mobile monitoring device combined with a digital rehabilitation program improves pulmonary function at 90 days postoperatively in patients undergoing curative-intent lobectomy or segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. Both groups receive standard postoperative rehabilitation education. The intervention group additionally receives a wearable device (chest patch or wristband) for continuous monitoring of SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, and physical activity, along with a smartphone-based digital rehabilitation program including individualized exercise prescriptions (aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training), daily symptom diaries, and remote feedback with threshold-triggered alerts for up to 90 days after discharge. The control group receives standard rehabilitation education with routine follow-up. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in FEV1% predicted at postoperative day 90, analyzed using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline FEV1% predicted. Secondary endpoints include FVC% predicted, 6-minute walk distance, daily step count, SpO₂ \<90% time burden, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC13, mMRC), 90-day readmission and emergency visit rates, and safety outcomes. A total of 126 participants (63 per group) will be enrolled. The study is being conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2026 to October 2027.

The purpose of Part 1 of this study is to evaluate the imaging characteristics, safety, biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of \[68Ga\]Ga-DFC413, and in Part 2 compare to \[68Ga\]Ga-NNS309 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), HR+/HER2- ductal and lobular breast cancer (BC), triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In Part 2 of this study (comparison of \[68Ga\]Ga-DFC413 and \[68Ga\]Ga-NNS309), not all indications might be explored.

The purpose of this phase I study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dosimetry, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of \[177Lu\]Lu-DWJ155 and the safety and imaging properties of \[68Ga\]Ga-DWJ155 in patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced HER2+, HR+/HER2-negative, or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), HER2-3+ or 2+ (ISH positive or negative) gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, and bladder cancer.

This is a study to evaluate the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of STRO-004 in adults with metastatic cancer. This study includes 3 parts: * Part 1A is a dose escalation study of STRO-004 monotherapy in selected tumor types known to commonly express Tissue Factor (TF). * Part 1B is a cohort expansion in 1 or more types of cancer to further evaluate a STRO-004 monotherapy dose, determine the best dose for use in later phases, and examine anti-tumor activity. * Part 1C is a dose escalation of STRO-004 combined with pembrolizumab to determine tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity of both drugs used together.