Pancreatitis, Acute

The purpose of this research is to compare intermittent fasting with a standard diet approach for improving the quality of life related to your pancreas disease. Our hope is to improve your symptoms and prevent you from needing to go into the hospital for pancreas-related issues.

Recent evidence suggests that postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) is a predictor of morbidity after pancreatectomy. This is based on the assumption that pancreatitis after pancreatectomy (PPAP) is a major trigger for the development of complications and is indicated by hyperamylasemia. Standardized prospective analysis and correlation with other laboratory parameters, hasn't been performed to date. Therefore the overall study aims are: * To prospectively evaluate the incidence and assess the clinical value of biochemical changes for the postoperative course. * To confirm and improve the definition and classification of postpancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) and to provide knowledge for effective early management of complications.

The standard prophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is performed with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A recent Japanese study demonstrated the efficacy of irrigating the periampullary region with ice water, however without the concomitant use of NSAIDs. The proposed study is a randomized, single-center, single-blind clinical trial that aims to compare the efficacy of rectal NSAIDs alone versus NSAIDs associated with ice water in the prevention of PEP.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of pioglitazone (PIO) versus empagliflozin (EMPA) to improve glycemic control in people with Chronic Pancreatitis (CP) or Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (RAP) or Acute Pancreatitis (AP) associated with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). To evaluate mixed meal response in PIO versus EMPA group to better understand physiology of both therapies in CP-DM.

This study aims to determine whether combining aggressive intravenous hydration with indometacin is more effective at preventing pancreatitis after a Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) than using indometacin alone. The study will involve patients who are scheduled to undergo ESWL for pancreatic stones. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one will receive both the intravenous hydration and the rectal indometacin, while the other will receive only the rectal indometacin. The trial will be conducted at multiple centers, ensuring a broad and diverse patient population. The primary outcome of the study will be the incidence of pancreatitis after the ESWL procedure. This study is important because it could lead to a better understanding of how to prevent pancreatitis after ESWL, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing the risk of serious complications.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multimodal (cytokine and lipopolysaccharide) hemoperfusion using the Efferon® LPS device in combination with hemofiltration (HF) / hemodiafiltration (HDF), with the goal of reducing the severity of organ dysfunction (measured by SOFA score) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Participants will be assigned to two groups for comparison: a control group receiving baseline therapy with HF/HDF, and a treatment group receiving baseline therapy in combination with HF/HDF and Efferon® LPS hemoadsorption.The therapy will be initiated within the first 24 hours after ICU admission and within 8 hours after patient enrollment.

This research is being done to determine if the administration of a short course of intravenous hydrocortisone, an anti-inflammatory medication, to patients with severe acute pancreatitis will improve their clinical outcomes and decrease the length of hospitalization. We think that because inflammation in the body drives the progression of pancreatitis, giving a short course of intravenous hydrocortisone may mitigate disease progression and improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

This is a descriptive analytical study to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for pancreatitis after Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in patients at Shariati Hospital in Tehran. The study aims to identify risk factors for post-FNB pancreatitis to improve clinical protocols, reduce complications and treatment costs, and increase diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic and biliary tract diseases. The study will collect demographic and clinical data from all eligible patients undergoing EUS-guided FNB during the study period. Amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all enrolled patients 24 hours post-procedure. Pancreatitis will be diagnosed based on abdominal pain and amylase or lipase levels exceeding three times the normal range 24 hours after the procedure. The outcomes will be independently adjudicated by an expert gastroenterologist not involved in the EUS procedures by reviewing participants' medical records. The consensus definition will be applied as a diagnostic framework (rather than a strict definition) so that the adjudicator can use their best judgment in cases that does not strictly satisfy the criteria. The patients will be contacted 24-72 h after the procedure to follow-up on any potential complications. The study plans to enroll at least 300 patients.

The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of pain treatment in AP in children using intravenous paracetamol in combination with ibuprofen or paracetamol in combination with metamizole. The study is prospective, interventional, and randomized.

There are currently no early predictive biomarkers for severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) that would allow stratification of patients for potential early interventional therapies. Hyperglycaemia is frequently observed to accompany and contribute to severe AP. However, the underlying mechanism is multifactorial, including in the acute phase of injury, where elevated adrenaline, cortisol and glucagon and inflammatory cytokine-induced insulin resistance all contribute to hyperglycaemia. The investigators propose that the extent of collateral injury of pancreatic β-cells and consequent loss of insulin secretion during the course of acute pancreatitis (AP) underlies disease severity. The investigators will measure plasma C-peptide (as a reliable readout of endogenous insulin), with moment-to-moment glucose monitoring (using subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring devices), and bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in a prospective cohort of 30 severe AP patient blood samples taken every 5 days for up to 5 weeks of hospitalization.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of parecoxib versus indomethacin in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). It is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, exploratory trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either parecoxib or indomethacin as a preventive treatment. The primary endpoint is to compare the efficacy of the two drugs in reducing the incidence of PEP. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of moderate to severe PEP and post-ERCP-related adverse events. This study will systematically assess the efficacy and safety of both drugs, providing preliminary data for future larger confirmatory trials.

ESGE guidelines suggests 30-60 seconds endoscopic large balloon papillary dilation from the disappearance of the waist of the papilla. The investigators have good results in stone removal with much quicker dilatations when the cholangiogram is followed and the dilation is finished as soon as the disappearance of the waist of the papilla is seen. This Scandinavian multicenter prospective study is especially interested in stone clearance rate and short and long-term adverse events such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, perforations, residual biliary stones, and newly developing biliary stones.