Peritoneal (metastatic) Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether adding targeted radiation plus cadonilimab immunotherapy to standard second-line chemo works better for adults with colorectal cancer only spread to the peritoneum, and check how safe this combined treatment is. Its main research questions are: Does the combined treatment slow cancer growth for a longer time than standard chemo alone? What side effects will participants get from the new combination therapy? Researchers will compare the chemo-radiation-immunotherapy combination against standard chemo alone to see if the new plan shrinks tumors and improves outcomes. Participants will: Receive either the new combined treatment or standard chemo chosen randomly by chance Visit the hospital regularly for drug infusions, scans and physical exams Complete questionnaires about daily quality of life and report any discomfort

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the safety and efficacy of of ACM-CpG for inoperable peritoneal metastases or malignant ascites. The main questions it aims to answer are: • To determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biologic dose (OBD) of intraperitoneal injection(s) of ACM-CpG for inoperable peritoneal metastases or malignant ascites? Researchers will assign treatment levels using escalating doses of ACM-CpG Therapy. Participants will: * Will receive at least one dose of ACM-CpG therapy on Day 1 of a 28-day treatment cycle. * May receive up to 2 additional injections if they have clinically stable or responsive disease. * Must visit the clinic on Days 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 for checkups and tests. * Will have a CT scan or MRI performed every 8 weeks for 3 scans and then continue to receive scans every 12 weeks to monitor their disease.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if paricalcitol or pirfenidone can help make tumors removable by surgery in adults with peritoneal cancer who are currently unable to have their tumor removed. The study aims to answer are whether paricalcitol or pirfenidone improve tumor response and tissue healing after 12 weeks of treatment, and which of these two drugs is more effective at helping participants become eligible for surgery. Researchers will compare paricalcitol to pirfenidone to see which drug works better and has a manageable safety profile. Participants will take either paricalcitol or pirfenidone by mouth every day for 12 weeks while continuing their standard chemotherapy, visit the clinic regularly for checkups and lab tests, keep a daily diary to track their study medication, and undergo a surgical re-evaluation after treatment to see if their tumor can be removed.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a combined surgical and chemotherapy approach (pancreatectomy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC) in patients aged 18 and older with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and synchronous peritoneal metastases. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the 90-day mortality rate for this intensive combined procedure lower than 5%? What are the postoperative morbidity and complication rates (as measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification) for these patients? How does this treatment impact the patient's quality of life 12 months after the procedure? Participants will: Complete at least 6 months of systemic chemotherapy to ensure the disease is stable or responding (biomarker CA19-9 must decline by \>20%). Undergo a major surgical procedure involving the removal of the pancreatic tumour (total Pancreatectomy or RAMPS) and any visible abdominal metastases (Cytoreductive Surgery). Receive Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), where heated Cisplatin and Paclitaxel are circulated in the abdominal cavity for 90 minutes during the operation. Participate in long-term follow-up to monitor recurrence-free and overall survival.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death, with approximately 15% of patients presenting with synchronous liver metastases (LM) and 7% with peritoneal metastases (PM) at diagnosis. Despite curative-intent resection of the primary tumor, 16-20% of patients subsequently develop metachronous LM and up to 19% develop PM within three years \[1-5\]. Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM), offering long-term (\>10years) disease-free survival (DFS) in a subset of highly selected patients \[6,7\]. However, selecting candidates for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains challenging and requires balancing the potential oncologic benefit of complete cytoreduction against perioperative risks and postoperative morbidity \[6-8\]. Consequently, strong prognostic markers-clinical, biological, or genetic-are crucial to refine surgical decision-making. Currently, the two most consistent clinical determinants of outcome are the extent of disease (Peritoneal Cancer Index, PCI) and the completeness of cytoreduction (CC-score) \[6-8\]. Over the last decade, surgical selection has become more restrictive (e.g., PCI threshold moving from 25 to 17), and molecular profiles such as BRAF mutations have been associated with poor outcomes, potentially guiding against aggressive surgery in selected cases \[8,9\]. Yet, these markers are insufficient to fully capture inter-patient heterogeneity and do not reliably individualize surgical benefit \[8,9\]. In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), the histological growth pattern (HGP) at the tumor-liver interface has emerged as a robust prognostic biomarker, with the desmoplastic HGP (d-HGP) associated with superior survival compared with replacement or pushing patterns \[10,11\]. International consensus guidelines have standardized HGP scoring for CRLM, enabling reproducible assessment and cross-study comparison \[12\]. Large multicentric cohorts also suggest possible modulation of HGP by systemic chemotherapy, supporting its value as a marker of intrinsic tumor biology and treatment response \[13,14\]. Transposing this concept to the peritoneum, our group identified two reproducible peritoneal HGP in colorectal peritoneal metastases: the pushing pattern (P-HGP) and the infiltrating pattern (I-HGP). Across two monocentric studies, a dominant P-HGP (\>50-60% of the tumor-peritoneum interface) was strongly associated with prolonged disease-free and overall survival (OS) \[15,16\]. Taken together, these findings support HGP of PM as a potential histological biomarker to refine patient selection for CRS ± HIPEC beyond current clinical and molecular criteria. However, existing data derive exclusively from retrospective single-center cohorts, underscoring the need for prospective validation to: Confirm the independent prognostic value of HGP of PM (for overall and disease-free survival) in contemporary clinical practice; Standardize sampling and pathological assessment (standard operating procedures, central review, and interobserver reproducibility studies); Develop and validate a histo-prognostic scoring system integrating PM HGP with relevant clinicopathological variables, aimed at predicting patient outcomes and supporting preoperative decision-making for CRS ± HIPEC candidacy. This prospective cohort study is designed to address these objectives without modifying standard care. By collecting clinicopathological and survival data prospectively, it will provide robust evidence for the integration of HGP into a multivariable prognostic model capable of stratifying surgical candidates and guiding individualized treatment strategies.

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of intraperitoneal PX in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with peritoneal metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D).

This research study aims to improve the treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC), a condition where cancer spreads within the abdomen. Patients with PC often experience significant pain and nutritional problems. Currently, there isn't a standard treatment approach, and doctors use different combinations of chemotherapy, surgery, and methods to deliver chemotherapy directly into the abdomen (intra-peritoneal or "IP" chemotherapy). The study will compare two IP chemotherapy methods: HIPEC and PIPAC. HIPEC involves circulating heated chemotherapy through the abdomen during surgery, while PIPAC delivers chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol during a laparoscopic procedure. Both methods aim to achieve the same goal, but they haven't been directly compared to see which is safer, more tolerable, more effective, and provides better value.

The goal of this phase II randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether adding lubiprostone to standard postoperative maintenance therapy can delay disease progression and recurrence in adult patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases (PM-CRC) who have undergone cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC after systemic treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does lubiprostone plus maintenance therapy improve the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared with maintenance therapy alone? Is lubiprostone safe and feasible for long-term use during the maintenance period in this PM-CRC population? Researchers will compare lubiprostone + maintenance therapy versus maintenance therapy alone to see if the addition of lubiprostone prolongs PFS, reduces the risk of distant metastasis, improves overall survival, and maintains or improves quality of life. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with lubiprostone or maintenance therapy alone after surgery (CRS ± HIPEC) and prior systemic therapy, according to the study protocol. Undergo scheduled follow-up assessments for disease status (progression/recurrence), survival outcomes, treatment-related toxicity, and quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) questionnaire.

γδT cells can directly recognize non-peptide tumor antigens, such as IPP phosphorylated metabolites, without relying on specific major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs). This unique characteristic leads to a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The clinical safety of γδT cells in allogeneic tumor therapies has been validated multiple times, highlighting their significant potential in developing universal CAR-T cell therapies. B7H3 (CD276), a member of the B7 negative co-stimulatory molecule family, is minimally expressed or absent in normal tissues but highly expressed in various tumor tissues. As a result, B7H3 is regarded as a highly promising tumor-associated antigen and a universal drug target with substantial therapeutic potential. By utilizing γδT cells as carrier cells, the development of universal B7H3 CAR-γδT cell injections for advanced solid tumors can effectively address risks such as autologous cell preparation failure and treatment delays. This innovative approach offers a highly efficient solution for solid tumor treatment and holds great promise for advancing immunotherapy in this field