Primary Biliary Cholangitis

The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the study drug, seladelpar, and its effects on clinical outcomes in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and compensated cirrhosis. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of seladelpar compared to placebo on EFS. EFS is defined as the time from start of treatment to the first occurrence of any of the following adjudicated events up to Week 156.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the efficacy of nemolizumab in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe chronic hepatic pruritus.

The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the combination of study drugs seladelpar and cilofexor. The study will assess, the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of the combination drugs versus both seladelpar alone and placebo, in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the combination of seladelpar + cilofexor leads to greater alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reduction than seladelpar alone and describe the safety and tolerability of seladelpar + cilofexor.

Study of Saroglitazar Magnesium for PBC Patients with Incomplete Response or Intolerant to UDCA Therapy

This phase I/II clinical trial evaluates human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (hUC-MSC) injection in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). The phase I component uses a 3+3 dose-escalation design with separate single-dose and multiple-dose stages to assess safety and tolerability, establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose, while monitoring adverse events, vital signs, laboratory parameters, and immunogenicity, and to explore preliminary efficacy signals. The phase II component is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the primary endpoint of composite response of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin at 12 weeks to evaluate efficacy, alongside continuous safety surveillance. Systematic measurements of liver function, cholestasis, immune markers, quality of life, and pruritus scores are incorporated to investigate mechanisms and potential biomarkers, aiming to generate robust clinical evidence that supports future development and clinical translation of hUC-MSC therapy for PBC.

Long-Term Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Participants with Primary Biliary Cholangitis of Saroglitazar Magnesium-V on Clinical Outcomes (EPICS-V)

Intro: The present clinical research protocol is part of the LEOPARD European project (Grant n° 101080964 Horizon Europe) which aims to design and validate new predictive models of mortality among liver transplantation (LT) candidates. MELD based-liver graft allocation systems have become increasingly inaccurate over the last decade to predict mortality/dropout of liver transplantation (LT) candidates on the waitlist (WL). Wide disparities in mortality/dropout on the WL also exist across European countries, ranging from 5 to 30% according to transplantation indications. In this setting, the European Commission- Horizon Europe funded-LEOPARD project intends to design new, 2nd generation, AI-machine learning-based predictive models of delisting in LT candidates, to better serve on time patients with the highest risk of dropout on the WL and to improve equity of access to LT across Europe. Hypothesis/Objective The scientific justification of the LEOPARD PVC1 is therefore 1. to build an external cohort of LT candidates to test and validate the LEOPARD models, therefore providing robust evidence for adoption of LEOPARD models by Organ Sharing Organizations (OSOs). 2. to collect granular data, bio- and tissues sampes and images to test last-generation OMICs predictors and radiomics, therefore opening the door to design of 3rd generation, precision medicine-based predictive models. The primary objective of the LEOPARD longitudinal study is to test and validate AI-based 2nd generation LEOPARD predictive models of mortality/drop out on the waitlist in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, or other end-stage chronic liver diseases, and in patients listed for HCC. Method Multicenter Prospective longitudinal study in up to 630 enrolments (in case of replacing participants after inclusion) to obtain 600 patients meeting selection criteria, in 30 hospitals in 5 European countries including France, Italy, The Netherlands, Belgium and Germany.

Intro: The present clinical research protocol is part of the LEOPARD European project (Grant n° 101080964 Horizon Europe) which aims to design and validate new predictive models of mortality among liver transplantation (LT) candidates. MELD based-liver graft allocation systems have become increasingly inaccurate over the last decade to predict mortality/dropout of liver transplantation (LT) candidates on the waitlist (WL). Wide disparities in mortality/dropout on the WL also exist across European countries, ranging from 5 to 30% according to transplantation indications and countries. In this setting, the European Commission- Horizon Europe funded-LEOPARD project intends to design new, 2nd generation, AI-machine learning-based predictive models of delisting in LT candidates, to better serve on time patients with the highest risk of dropout on the WL and to improve equity of access to LT across Europe. Hypothesis/Objective: The scientific justification of the LEOPARD TVDCS is therefore to collect a large set of data in liver transplantation candidates listed in Europe a) to design and b) to validate LEOPARD 2nd generation AI-based predictive models of mortality/dropout The primary objective is to develop new predictive models of mortality/drop out on the waitlist in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, or other end-stage chronic liver diseases, and in patients listed for Hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC). Method: Longitudinal multicenter prospective health care data collection cohort study in 2 sets : Training/development set : Prospective health care data collection in 3,000 patients listed in 50 centres across 7 countries and Validation set: Prospective health care data collection in 1,500 subsequent patients listed in the same 50 centres.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS0159 in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

The goal of this registry is to better understand how primary biliary cholangitis develops over time, including the role of disease-related biomarkers, complications of the disease, and symptom burden. Patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated at participating centres in Austria will be invited to take part in this prospective registry. Participation in an associated biobank is optional. Clinical and laboratory data will be collected, and patients will be followed regularly through scheduled clinic visits. In addition, biological samples (serum, plasma, and, if available, liver tissue) may be collected and stored in the biobank for future research.

Recent evidence suggests that combining liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) significantly improves risk stratification in patients with PBC. In a study the addition of spleen stiffness to liver stiffness enhanced the prediction of liver decompensation, providing a more precise evaluation of portal hypertension. Furthermore, when combined with platelet count, this approach effectively identified patients with a low probability of harboring HRVs. This could allow clinicians to safely avoid unnecessary endoscopic procedures in selected patients, improving patient comfort and reducing healthcare costs. Therefore, our patients participating in this trial will undergo follow up (every 6 months) as per Standard of care. This includes a blood draw, FibroScan and Ultrasound. Together with this, 2 questionnaires will be completed (not as per SOC) and during the FibroScan, a spleen stiffness measurement will be performed.

This study is a bidirectional cohort study. The investigators conduct a bidirectional cohort study utilizing a database in mainland China, continuously collecting demographics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical characteristics of diagnosed PBC patients. The study aims to analyze the association between varying post-treatment alkaline phosphatase (AKP) levels and complication-free survival rates, with the objective to develop and validate a predictive survival model.

Current treatment guidelines recommend ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as the first-line treatment for new-diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. However, up to 40% patients are insensitive to UDCA monotherapy, and evaluation of UDCA response at 12 months may result in long period of ineffective treatment. We aimed to develop a new criterion to reliably identify non-response patients much earlier. Recently, our team designed and validated a new early criterion for distinguishing high-risk PBC patients in a Chinese population for the first time. Our data indicated that PBC patients with ALP ≤ 2.5 × ULN, AST ≤ 2 × ULN, and TBIL ≤ 1 × ULN (Xi'an criterion) after 1 month UDCA treatment were likely to have better prognosis. It can be readily applied in the rapid identification of PBC patients who require additional therapeutic approaches. However, whether it is reasonable to apply it to the response definition of clinical research, and the guidance of PBC management and choice of second-line treatment, further research is needed.

The main objectives of the study were to assess the effects of fenofibrate on serum alkaline phosphatase, as a composite endpoint and on safety in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

A phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of TH104 in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) participants with moderate to severe pruritus.

Research project in which biological material is sampled and health-related medical data is collected. In addition, already existing health-related medical data are used for further research. Coded data are used.

This study aims to provide comprehensive insights into the therapeutic effects of combination treatment with ursodiol and seladelpar in PBC patients by assessing biochemical responses using biomarkers such as ALP and total bilirubin.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare, autoimmune, cholestatic liver disease. No data about the disease epidemiology exist in Italy. Therefore this study aims to develop a national PBC patient database linked to a biological sample storage.

An Open Label Long-Term Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Fenofibrate in Subjects with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

This study explores the feasibility of the reducing medication regimen for Ursodeoxycholic Acid(UDCA) in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. The participants will be distributed randomly into two experimental groups and one control group. The two experimental groups will receive reduced dosage of UDCA at different level, while the control group will receive standard dosage of UDCA. The effect of therapy will be evaluated every three months.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been considered a rare disease and its management has been limited by the lack of therapeutic alternatives. PBC is a slowly progressing chronic liver disease characterized by an immune-mediated destruction of the intrahepatic bile ducts, which leads to cholestasis, portal inflammation, and ultimately liver cirrhosis and its associated complications (ascites, portal hypertension, etc), if not treated effectively. Thus, early diagnosis and close management of these patients with PBC is essential. First-line treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver biochemical parameters, delays histological progression, and increases liver transplant-free survival and overall survival. However, up to 40% of patients are non-responders to UDCA. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is recommended as second-line therapy in combination with UDCA for patients with an inadequate response to UDCA or as monotherapy in cases of UDCA intolerance. According to current clinical guidelines, the diagnosis of PBC includes a combination of elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) (titer \>1:40) and/or anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) anti-gp210 or anti-sp100. AMA are highly sensitive and specific for PBC and are detected in nearly 95% of PBC patients. A liver biopsy is not necessary unless there is an elevation of ALP without the presence of specific AMA and/or anti-gp210 or anti-sp100 ANA or if coexistence with other liver diseases is suspected (autoimmune hepatitis, hepatic steatosis). The incidence of PBC has increased in recent years due to an increase in the diagnosis of cases in the initial phases, better awareness in the medical community and the development of more sensitive diagnostic tests. However, up to 31% of patients with PBC are lost without follow-up. The correct identification of patients with PBC is essential so that they can benefit from an adequate treatment and modify disease progression. To date, two studies (one Spanish and one Portuguese) showed that 27% and 45.5% of the patients lost with PBC presented advanced fibrosis, respectively. The objective of this study is to identify, through computerized data, patients with PBC who may be lost in the system and evaluate their clinical, analytical and demographic characteristics, and in a second phase, provide access to follow-up in specialized consultations.