Shoulder Instability

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of a Modified Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block combined with Suprascapular Nerve Block (SSNB) versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block (ISB) in adult patients undergoing elective Bankart repair or Latarjet surgery under general anesthesia. Seventy patients will be randomized to receive either Modified PENG plus SSNB or ISB. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, functional recovery, range of motion, and block-related complications including respiratory compromise, motor weakness, Horner syndrome, hoarseness, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of a Modified Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block combined with Suprascapular Nerve Block (SSNB) versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block (ISB) in adult patients undergoing elective Bankart repair or Latarjet surgery under general anesthesia. Seventy patients will be randomized to receive either Modified PENG plus SSNB or ISB. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, functional recovery, range of motion, and block-related complications including respiratory compromise, motor weakness, Horner syndrome, hoarseness, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

This randomized controlled trial seeks to address a significant clinical gap by evaluating the outcomes of two postoperative immobilization methods following arthroscopic soft tissue surgery for anterior shoulder instability: a standard static arm sling and a dynamic shoulder orthosis.

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if adding neurocognitive loading to standard shoulder rehabilitation improves physical and psychological recovery in adults who have undergone arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery (such as Bankart repair, Latarjet, or remplissage procedures). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does adding neurocognitive loading exercises improve shoulder proprioception, muscle strength, and functional performance compared to standard therapy alone? Does this integrated training approach reduce the kinesiophobia? Does it lead to better overall clinical outcomes and improve psychological readiness to return to sports? Researchers will compare a group receiving standard shoulder exercises combined with dual-task neurocognitive loading (using light-based reaction systems and cognitive tasks) to a control group receiving standard shoulder rehabilitation alone. Participants will:Undergo supervised physical therapy sessions starting 10 days after surgery up to the 16th postoperative week (twice a week for the first 12 weeks, and once a week for weeks 13-16) alongside an assigned home exercise program. Complete neurocognitive loading tasks (if assigned to the intervention group) that challenge attention, quick decision-making, and visual reactions while executing physical movements. Attend detailed clinical evaluation sessions lasting about 60 minutes before the treatment starts, and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. These assessments include neurocognitive, functional and clinical tests, and questionnaires.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized shoulder stabilization exercise program in amateur volleyball players diagnosed with atraumatic shoulder instability. Shoulder pain is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal complaints, affecting up to two-thirds of the general population at some point in life and frequently leading to long-term symptoms, functional limitations, sleep disturbances, and high socio-economic costs. Atraumatic glenohumeral instability is particularly common among athletes performing overhead movements, such as volleyball players, who are repeatedly exposed to high-velocity external and internal rotation actions during serves and spikes. The Derby Shoulder Instability Rehabilitation Programme (DSIRP) is a structured, reproducible protocol integrating strengthening, proprioceptive, neuromuscular control, plyometric, and speed-oriented exercises. Although widely used in clinical practice, evidence supporting its superiority over the natural progression of the condition remains limited. More than 80% of physiotherapists in the United Kingdom do not use specific standardized protocols for atraumatic shoulder instability, highlighting the need for high-quality clinical trials that evaluate structured rehabilitation approaches. This study will recruit amateur volleyball players aged 20 to 30 years with a clinical diagnosis of atraumatic shoulder instability lasting more than 3 months. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into two parallel groups: an experimental group performing the DSIRP for 8 weeks (three 25-minute sessions per week), and a control group following a "wait-and-see" approach. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months (post-intervention). The primary outcomes include pain intensity measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and shoulder disability measured with the Spanish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include external rotation strength, grip strength, shoulder range of motion, and health-related quality of life assessed with the SF-12 questionnaire. All measurements use validated instruments with high reliability for clinical and research settings. Statistical analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA or non-parametric alternatives when appropriate. Effect sizes and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons will be applied. An independent biostatistician blinded to allocation will conduct the analysis. The study follows CONSORT and TIDieR guidelines for reporting and intervention description. This trial seeks to determine whether a structured, progressive stabilization protocol offers clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, strength, mobility, and quality of life compared with no intervention in young volleyball players with atraumatic shoulder instability. Results may support the implementation of standardized rehabilitation strategies in physiotherapy practice for this condition.

This is a pilot multi-centre, double blinded randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of this pilot trial will be feasibility. Prior to conducting a large definitive trial, the investigators will conduct this pilot trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR), evaluating recurrent dislocation rates and functional outcomes over a 24-month period. The feasibility objectives are: (1) to evaluate the investigators ability to recruit patients across multiple sites and (2) to assess study protocol adherence and ability to follow patients to 24 months. Clinical objectives for the pilot trial are exploratory only. The investigators wish to gather means and standard deviations for clinical outcomes to power their future definitive trial. The objectives of the definitive trial will include a comparison of patient-reported outcomes at the two-year post-operative time point, differences in recurrence rates, complication rates, functional shoulder assessments, and return to work/sport.

The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to provide epidemiological and prognostic data from a defined urban population and to improve understanding of risk factors and long-term outcomes following first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients aged 16 years and older presenting to the Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * What is the incidence of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations in the Oslo region? * What is the prevalence and extent of bipolar bone loss and soft tissue injuries measured by CT and MR after a first-time shoulder dislocation? * Does bone loss increase the risk of recurrent shoulder instability? * How do imaging findings and recurrence influence long-term shoulder function and quality of life? Participants will: * Undergo standard clinical evaluation and conventional radiographs as part of routine care and asked to participate and followed longitudinally * Be offered additional CT and MRI imaging to assess glenoid and humeral bone loss and to evaluate soft tissue injuries. * Complete electronic questionnaires (WOSI, EQ-5D-5L, pain score, Rowe score, return to sport/work) at 3 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years. * Be invited to long-term follow-up, including radiographs at 10 years to evaluate signs of osteoarthritis.

This 20-year cohort study follows patients after shoulder instability surgery to evaluate recurrence rates, long-term functional outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and complications. The goal is to provide insights into the durability and effectiveness of surgical treatment in order to improve patient care.

Shoulder pain is very common and can make daily activities difficult. Many people have shoulder pain for a long time, even after treatment. Common shoulder problems include pain from the shoulder muscles and tendons, a frozen shoulder, or an unstable shoulder. Unfortunately, both surgery and physiotherapy often help only a little. This can be due to many reasons, such as people not continuing their exercises, fear of moving the shoulder, incorrect beliefs about pain, other health problems, or lifestyle factors. Virtual Reality (VR) is a new and promising technology that is already being used to help people with long-lasting pain. By using a VR headset, people can exercise in a motivating and engaging virtual environment. VR may help reduce fear of movement, improve how people feel about their body, make movement easier, and help people stick to their exercises. However, there is still very little research on using VR for long-lasting shoulder pain. The goal of this study is to find out whether a home-based VR exercise program for people with ongoing shoulder complaints is practical and acceptable. The investigators want to know if people are willing and able to use VR at home, whether they continue the treatment, and whether it shows early signs of reducing pain and limitations. They also want to understand who benefits most from VR, in which situations it works best, and why it may or may not help. People aged 16 years and older who have had shoulder pain and limitations for more than three months can take part. This includes people with shoulder tendon-related pain, frozen shoulder, or shoulder instability. The study lasts six weeks and includes three parts. First, participants receive online educational videos about shoulder pain and movement. Second, they take part in three physiotherapy sessions: one in person and two online. Third, participants use a VR headset at home every day for about 15 minutes to perform guided shoulder and whole-body exercises, such as reaching or aiming tasks. The exercises gradually become more challenging. Participants receive clear written and video instructions, and technical support is available if needed. During the study, participants will complete questionnaires and the VR system will record basic usage data. At the end of the study, group interviews will be held with participants and physiotherapists to talk about their experiences with VR and how it influenced pain, movement, and daily activities. Using VR is considered safe. Some people may experience mild and short-lasting side effects, such as dizziness, but serious problems are not expected. The main effort for participants is the time spent on exercises and completing questionnaires. The results of this study will help determine whether VR is a useful and realistic treatment option for people with long-lasting shoulder pain and will guide future, larger studies.

Most rehabilitation protocols require patients to train the affected limbs with high regularity, following repetitive cycles of exercises, in order to recover mobility and strength. Nonetheless, the repetitive nature of these exercises can demotivate patients leading to less intense and committed training, if not ending with a lack of compliance toward the prescribed exercises, ultimately leading to a suboptimal recovery. For this reason, several research groups are investigating solutions to help patients in this process, using robotic support or protocols assisted by virtual reality (VR). Most of these studies have shown benefits, notably in the field of post-stroke rehabilitation, however numerous types of physical therapies have not been investigated yet. Therefore, the main goal of this study will be to explore if the combination of modern motion-tracking and VR can provide significant functional outcomes for the treatment of the most common upper limb pathologies. The investigators created a set of exergames designed to lead the patients through a gamified version of part of physiotherapy (PT). This modified therapy is expected to offer several benefits to the treatment with respect to a purely conventional therapy: (i) improved patient's motivation and commitment to the exercises; (ii) constant evaluation of the patient's performance, thanks to the use of motion tracking; (iii) session-by-session tuning of exercises difficulty; (iv) clear progress traceability; (v) real-time alerts in case of problematic or compensatory movements; (vi) measurement and evaluation of new metrics of movements quality that were not possible in conventional therapy setups. To evaluate the feasibility of this project, the investigators would like to test the VR system on a short series of patients during four sessions.

This study will compare functional outcomes after an arthroscopic Bankart repair between patients that underwent conventional arthroscopic Bankart repair rehabilitation, following the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists guideline and patients that underwent 'multifactorial approach training', which focusses on decreasing kinesiophobia and fear of recurrent dislocations. The study population comprises patients who will undergo Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) after a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation at Spaarne Gasthuis Haarlem/Hoofddorp, OLVG Amsterdam, Amstelland Ziekenhuis Amstelveen, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Medisch Spectrum Twente, or Flevoziekenhuis Almere.