Simulation

This study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study with a pretest-posttest design to examine the effect of the operating room environment experience of preoperative patients using virtual reality glasses on the patients' preoperative surgical fear level and care perceptions.

Simulation training provided before clinical practice at many universities helps students feel confident and well prepared for the clinical environment. Simulation-based learning not only improves professional competence in midwifery educators but also equips and empowers midwifery students in practice. In undergraduate midwifery education, students are provided obstetric skills training on electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), delivery management, shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage, breech delivery, umbilical cord prolapse and perineal repair (incision and episiotomy). It has been determined that simulation-based training positively affects the perceived readiness of the participants. It is emphasized that health personnel should be encouraged to freely choose birth positions and be informed about the risks and benefits of upright and supine positions. This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of midwifery students' use of alternative birth positions in the second stage of labor on students' anxiety, self-efficacy, skill and knowledge levels.

The goal of the randomized educational intervention study is to test whether simulation preceding didactic teaching leads to improved knowledge and performance retention compared to a didactic lecture proceeding simulation for medical students Participants will be randomized to one of two different groups with reverse orders for simulation and lectures. Researchers will compare each group to see which way is better for learning.

Poor team communication in the OR is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Thus, experts recommend that the healthcare team in a crisis situation use secure and standardized communication to improve the quality and safety of care. Secure and standardized communication involves clear, concise, and unambiguous language. Methods of secure communication include closed-loop communication (CLC), precise and complete communication (direct, full dosage), and the use of the SBAR tool. To improve healthcare professionals' communication, it is essential to use effective educational tools. Traditionally, lectures or reading articles were the standard methods. The use of video as a tool for knowledge and skills transfer seems promising. The objective is to compare the learning of secure communication in crisis situations in anesthesia after using two different educational supports: a text versus an educational video. A prospective, multicenter, controlled, and randomized study will be conducted during high-fidelity simulation sessions in anesthesia, comparing a group using a text-type educational support versus a group using an educational video. It will take place in simulation centers. Voluntary participants will be anesthesia and critical care residents and/or nurse anesthetists who have used one of the educational supports and then actively participated in the simulation scenarios. After their consent, participants will be randomized into two groups: * Text group: Participants will read a text-type educational support for 15 minutes at the beginning of the session before their involvement in 2 high-fidelity crisis simulation scenarios. * Video group: Participants will watch a 15-minute educational video at the beginning of the session before their involvement in the 2 high-fidelity simulation scenarios. The primary endpoint will be to compare the total number of correct secure communication events during the crisis between the 2 groups, which includes: a) Number of correctly performed SBAR b) Number of correctly or partially performed closed-loop communications (CLC) c) Number of directive verbal orders d) Number of correct medication dosages. This evaluation will be based on video recordings of the 2 scenarios assessed by 2 independent, blinded experts (external evaluation of a team's secure communication skills (Kirkpatrick level 2). This composite score is based on various secure communication methods described in the literature and recommended by experts. The number of verbal orders per scenario will also be recorded. The secondary endpoint will be to evaluate each item independently, the proportion of CLC per verbal order, satisfaction with the educational tool (Kirkpatrick level 1), and the perception of learning in terms of secure communication (1 to 10 Likert scale, Kirkpatrick level 2). Participants' characteristics will also be collected.