Uterine Atony With Hemorrhage

2

Review clinical trials related to Uterine Atony With Hemorrhage. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Oxytocin Bolus Versus Infusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section (INBOX-HR)

The goal of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial is to learn if Oxytocin is most effective at achieving adequate uterine tone (important for preventing postpartum hemorrhage) when administered as a bolus or an infusion in patients at high-risk for postpartum hemorrhage in elective cesarean sections. The main questions that will be answered are: 1. Is Oxytocin bolus more effective than Oxytocin infusion at achieving adequate uterine tone at 2 minutes after the baby is born and every minute thereafter? 2. Does Oxytocin bolus cause less maternal side effects than Oxytocin infusion? 3. Does Oxytocin bolus result in less blood loss than Oxytocin infusion in high risk for postpartum hemorrhage patients undergoing elective cesarean sections? 3\. Are patients more satisfied with their cesarean section when they receive Oxytocin bolus or Oxytocin infusion? Researchers will compare the 2 methods of Oxytocin administration, bolus versus infusion, to see which method is more effective or if they are equally effective. Participants will: 1. Be randomized to receive either Oxytocin bolus or Oxytocin infusion during their cesarean section but after the baby is born. 2. Be asked a question about their experience 2 hours after the surgery. 3. Allow the research team to collect information about how they are doing from their hospital medical records.

Participants needed: 180
Trial details
Phase: Phase 4Age: 18-45Biological sex: FemaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Stony Brook UniversityUpdated: Aug 3, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia or combined spinal... [+2]

Parturient in labor or ruptured membranes [+8]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Exteriorization Versus In Situ Hysterotomy Repair During Cesarean: Effects on Uterine Tone

During standard cesarean deliveries, there are two ways that obstetricians repair the incision on the uterus (hysterotomy after delivery of the baby. One method involves lifting the uterus out of its regular place in the abdomen to repair the incision (uterine exteriorization for repair). The second method involves leaving the uterus inside the abdomen to repair the uterus (in situ repair). Both of these methods are regularly used by obstetricians during cesarean deliveries, and it is not currently known if one has benefits over the other. Currently, surgeons use both methods, but lifting the uterus out of its place is slightly more common. In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to have one of these techniques performed during their surgery. Researchers will be investigating whether one technique or the other leads to better contraction of the uterus after delivery, less bleeding, less intra-operative nausea/vomiting, or a better patient experience than another.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-55Biological sex: FemaleType: InterventionalSponsor: Stanford UniversityUpdated: May 27, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Age 18-55 [+1]

Patient age <18 or >55 [+1]