Clinical trials

This open-label, single-group, non-randomized interventional study will evaluate longitudinal changes in anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, psychological well-being, treatment adherence, tolerability, and safety in adults with clinician-confirmed generalized anxiety disorder. Participants will receive CannaRiver CBD Calm, an oral/sublingual broad-spectrum cannabinoid tincture containing cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN), and cannabigerol (CBG), at a protocol dose of 0.5 mL approximately every 12 hours for 8 weeks. Follow-up will continue through Week 12. The study has no placebo or concurrent comparator group. The primary outcome is change in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) total score from baseline to Week 8. Findings will be descriptive and hypothesis-generating; the design cannot establish that any observed change was caused by the product.

Chronic pain disproportionately affects women and may coexist with impaired bone health, particularly during midlife and after menopause. The endocannabinoid system is involved in pain modulation and bone homeostasis; however, clinical studies that integrate pain outcomes, bone-related biomarkers, genetic variants, and salivary endocannabinoids remain limited.This randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled crossover trial will evaluate the effects of a full-spectrum medicinal cannabis extract with a cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol ratio of 5:1 on chronic pain in women aged 45 to 80 years with chronic pain refractory to conventional treatment. Eighty participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences: full-spectrum cannabis extract followed by matching placebo, or matching placebo followed by full-spectrum cannabis extract. The treatment periods, washout interval, and visit schedule will follow the final approved protocol.The primary outcome is change in chronic pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, sleep quality, functional impact, bone health biomarkers, bone mineral density measured by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry, salivary endocannabinoids, the association of CB and TRPV genetic variants with treatment response, and adverse events. The study aims to generate evidence on the clinical effects and biological correlates of medicinal cannabis therapy in women with chronic pain.

Chronic muscle pain is one of the most prevalent clinical challenges in sports medicine, significantly affecting training capacity, competitive performance, and quality of life in athletes. The endocannabinoid system has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for pain modulation in the sports context. This prospective, comparative, non-randomized observational study aims to evaluate whether adjuvant topical application of a cannabinoid balm (CBD:THC 3:1 - Papa \& Barkley) provides additional reduction in chronic muscle pain intensity in athletes, compared to systemic CBD oil alone, over 90 days of follow-up in a real-world clinical practice setting. Sixty adult athletes (amateur or professional) with established chronic muscle pain (≥3 months) who receive clinical indication for cannabinoid therapy will be followed in two observational cohorts: Cohort A (n=30), receiving only systemic CBD oil (60 mg/day oral/sublingual), and Cohort B, (n=30) receiving systemic CBD oil plus the topical cannabinoid balm (CBD:THC 3:1, applied twice daily to the affected muscle area). Treatment allocation is based exclusively on the clinical decision of the principal investigator, reflecting routine medical practice. The primary outcome is the change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scores from baseline (D0) to end of follow-up (D90). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity (NRS), sleep quality (PSQI), quality of life (SF-36), perceived muscle recovery (TQR scale), functional capacity (LEFS/UEFI), rescue analgesic use, and safety/tolerability of the topical formulation. The study aims to generate real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant topical cannabinoid therapy in athletes with chronic muscle pain in the Brazilian clinical practice setting.

Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) is a high-intensity martial art that imposes significant physical and physiological demands on practitioners, including rigorous training and frequent competitions, which can result in chronic inflammation, delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), sleep disturbances, and reduced quality of life. Effective recovery strategies are essential to optimize athletic performance and longevity in the sport. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic phytocannabinoid derived from Cannabis sativa, has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent due to its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anxiolytic, and neuroprotective properties. Preclinical studies indicate that CBD modulates inflammatory pathways, such as inhibition of NF-κB and NLRP3, thereby reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-1β, while increasing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In clinical contexts, CBD has shown potential to attenuate DOMS and improve sleep without the adverse effects associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, evidence in BJJ athletes remains limited, with gaps in the translation of preclinical findings to healthy athletic populations. The prevalence of injuries in combat sports can reach 28%, with contusions and sprains being common and further exacerbating inflammation and pain. Although approximately 23.4% of athletes report cannabis use, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically for BJJ evaluating isolated CBD at standardized doses. Furthermore, concerns regarding hepatotoxicity, monitored through enzymes such as AST and ALT, require rigorous safety evaluation. This protocol describes an RCT to investigate the effects of 200 mg/day of isolated CBD for 12 weeks in BJJ athletes, focusing on sensitive inflammatory markers (IL-6 as the primary pro-inflammatory marker and IL-10 as the anti-inflammatory marker), pain, sleep, and quality of life. The study aims to address gaps identified in systematic reviews and provide an evidence-based foundation for future recommendations.