Clinical trials

2

Search and review clinical trials. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Oral GnRH Antagonist (Linzagolix) Versus Injectable GnRH Antagonist and Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization: a Prospective Comparative Observational Study

Preventing a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) is essential during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF), because such a rise can reduce the number of eggs collected. Current practice relies on either a daily injectable GnRH antagonist or an oral progestin (PPOS), which requires that all embryos be frozen. Linzagolix is an oral GnRH antagonist already approved for uterine fibroids and endometriosis. It has not previously been used to control ovarian stimulation for IVF; this study represents its first use for this purpose. This is an observational study: participants are not randomly assigned to a treatment. Each woman receives one of three approaches - oral linzagolix, an injectable GnRH antagonist (ganirelix or cetrorelix), or PPOS - chosen by the clinical team based on her individual situation. The three groups are then compared using statistical adjustment for baseline differences between them. The study will enroll approximately 195 women undergoing IVF or ICSI, aged 18 to \[42\], who are not selected based on ovarian reserve. All participants receive individualized gonadotropin stimulation and standard monitoring; only the method used to prevent premature ovulation differs by group. The main question is whether linzagolix leads to a similar number of mature eggs (MII) retrieved compared with the injectable antagonist. The study will also assess how well each approach suppresses LH, safety (including ovarian hyperstimulation), and the number of injections needed.

Participants needed: 195
Trial details
Age: 18-42Biological sex: FemaleType: ObservationalSponsor: Centro A.M.B.R.A. (Associazione Medici e Biologi per la Riproduzione Assistita)Updated: Aug 3, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Female, aged 18 to 42 years [+4]

Known contraindications or hypersensitivity to the study drugs [+3]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Hysteroscopy and CD138+ Plasma Cell Density in Chronic Endometritis

The goal of this observational study is to learn if a hysteroscopy exam alone can find chronic endometritis, a long-lasting inflammation of the lining of the uterus. A hysteroscopy is an exam that looks inside the uterus with a thin camera. Chronic endometritis is usually confirmed with a lab test that counts CD138-positive cells, a type of immune cell, in a small tissue sample from the uterus. About 100 women will take part. All are already having a hysteroscopy and a tissue sample as part of their fertility care, often after repeated failed embryo transfers or repeated miscarriage. The main question it aims to answer is: Do the visual signs seen during hysteroscopy relate closely enough to the CD138 cell count to reliably find chronic endometritis without a lab test? Participants will: Have a hysteroscopy exam and a tissue sample from the uterus, both already part of their routine fertility care Have their hysteroscopy video reviewed by two doctors who do not know the tissue sample results Have their tissue sample checked in the lab for CD138 cells

Participants needed: 100
Trial details
Age: 18-46Biological sex: FemaleType: ObservationalSponsor: Centro A.M.B.R.A. (Associazione Medici e Biologi per la Riproduzione Assistita)Updated: Jul 29, 2026Duration: 1 Year
Eligibility criteria

Woman aged 18-46 years undergoing office hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy as... [+2]

Current or suspected pregnancy [+7]