Clinical trials

This prospective observational cohort study examines the energy requirements and nutritional care of patients undergoing total or partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumors. Patients undergoing pancreatectomy face major metabolic stress, a high burden of preoperative malnutrition, and frequent exocrine or endocrine insufficiency, yet procedure-specific nutritional guidance is limited. The study measures resting energy expenditure (REE) directly by indirect calorimetry during the early postoperative period and compares it with widely used predictive equations (Harris-Benedict, Schofield) and simplified weight-based targets (25 and 30 kcal/kg) to determine how accurately clinicians can estimate energy needs when calorimetry is unavailable. In the same patients, the study records the route of postoperative nutrition (enteral, parenteral, or combined), energy and protein intake relative to requirements, and diet-related symptoms, and follows postoperative complications, hospital readmission, mortality, and changes in body weight and body mass index through 3-6 months after surgery. By capturing measured energy expenditure and nutritional delivery in one cohort, the study aims to clarify whether adequacy of energy and protein intake, feeding route, or both influence recovery, and to provide primary data for developing individualized nutritional support protocols in this high-risk surgical population.

In this study the efficacy of a pulmonary rehabilitation program tailored to the needs of patients with dysfunctional breathing (DB) will be investigated using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The pulmonary rehabilitation program will be compared with physiotherapy which is currently the mainstream therapy of DB.

We attempt to perform dynamic endotyping of critically ill patients presenting in the emergency department with de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). We also attempt to identify what clinical, radiological, physiological and biological variables collected early in the course of AHRF correlate with subsequent mortality and/or persistent severe hypoxemia.

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore whether different modes of mechanical ventilation affect pupillary constriction velocities in critically ill patients without brain injury. The study aims to determine whether the type of mechanical ventilation (volume control, pressure control, or pressure-regulated volume control) influences the maximum and mean constriction velocity measured by automated pupillometry. The trial also investigates whether changes in pupil dynamics reflect subtle alterations in brainstem-autonomic interaction induced by ventilation mode. The comparison involves volume control, pressure control, and pressure-regulated volume control in a randomized crossover design to assess whether ventilation mode has a measurable effect on pupil response. Eligible participants will be intubated ICU patients receiving assist control ventilation who are not yet ready for spontaneous breathing trials. Serial pupillometry measurements will be conducted while participants are ventilated with each mode for at least 15 minutes. Sedation and lighting conditions will remain consistent throughout the protocol. Participants with acute or chronic neurologic conditions or ventilator dyssynchrony will be excluded.