Clinical trials

The goal of this study is to establish a standardized operating procedure for Precision Partial Intersphincteric Resection (PPISR), and to evaluate its surgical safety, functional benefits, and oncological efficacy.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of the postbiotic preparation JK-5G on gastrointestinal function recovery (GI-2 time), gastrointestinal dysfunction, nutritional status, and safety in patients after surgery for malignant bowel obstruction. Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory clinical trial. Patients are randomized 1:1 within 24 hours after surgery. After meeting criteria for initiating enteral intake, they receive either JK-5G or placebo (one sachet three times daily) for 10 consecutive days, and are followed up to postoperative day 30. Study Population: Adult patients (18-80 years old) who undergo surgery for malignant mechanical bowel obstruction and are hemodynamically stable within 24 hours after surgery. Sample Size: A total of 80 patients (40 in the postbiotic group and 40 in the placebo group). A blinded review of variability will be conducted after 40 patients have completed the study. Primary Endpoint: Time from the end of surgery to GI-2 recovery, where GI-2 recovery is defined as the later of the following two events: first passage of stool/effective stoma output, and first tolerance of the target diet. Key secondary endpoints include daily I-FEED scores, incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus, achievement of nutritional targets, and safety events. Statistics and Timeline: The primary analysis will use a stratified Cox model (intention-to-treat principle). The study is planned to be conducted from September 2026 to February 2028.

This study is for people with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who have not received previous systemic treatment for liver cancer. The study will compare lenvatinib plus tislelizumab with or without gefitinib. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either lenvatinib, tislelizumab, and gefitinib, or lenvatinib and tislelizumab. The study is open-label, so participants and study doctors will know the treatment group. The main outcomes are progression-free survival and the number of participants with adverse events of special interest. Progression-free survival is the time from randomization until the cancer gets worse or the participant dies. Adverse events of special interest are predefined side effects that require close monitoring. The study will also evaluate tumor response, overall survival, other side effects, and exploratory biomarkers.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Seltoplasmid Injection can improve outcomes after lower-extremity revascularization. Revascularization is a procedure used to restore blood flow to the leg. The study will include adults with type 2 diabetes, a foot ulcer caused by poor blood flow, and disease mainly affecting the arteries below the knee. The main questions are: * Does adding Seltoplasmid lower the risk of major amputation, another procedure to restore blood flow, or death? * What medical problems occur after treatment with Seltoplasmid? About 180 participants will undergo standard lower-extremity revascularization. After the procedure, eligible participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups. One group will receive Seltoplasmid plus standard care. The other group will receive standard care alone. Participants in the Seltoplasmid group will receive injections into the muscles of the affected lower leg. The injections will be given on Day 0, Day 14, and Day 28. Participants will be followed for 12 months. Researchers will also assess wound healing, survival without amputation, heart and blood vessel problems, pain, and blood flow in the affected leg.

This investigator-initiated, multicenter clinical trial will evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of adding entacapone to bevacizumab in adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma at first recurrence after standard first-line treatment. Participants must not have previously received bevacizumab. A multidisciplinary neuro-oncology team must determine that repeat tumor resection is not appropriate, or the patient must decline repeat surgery after being informed of its potential benefits and risks. The study has two stages. In the first stage, 6 participants who can be evaluated for dose-limiting toxicity will receive open-label entacapone 400 mg by mouth three times daily plus bevacizumab. Enrollment will occur in two cohorts of 3, with safety review by an independent data and safety monitoring board. Up to 3 participants who cannot complete the 28-day toxicity evaluation for reasons unrelated to toxicity may be replaced. If the combination has acceptable safety and the required approvals are obtained, 90 new participants will enter the second stage and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to entacapone or matching placebo. Both groups will receive bevacizumab. The primary endpoint of the randomized stage is progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. The study plans to obtain data from 96 evaluable participants, with no more than 99 participants receiving study treatment.

This multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial evaluates single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. A prespecified prospective substudy will assess early postoperative pain, abdominal wall trauma, and early recovery between the two surgical approaches.

This study plans to enroll no fewer than 48 adult patients who have non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth due to trauma or dental diseases and are candidates for immediate implant placement, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The objective of this observational study is to investigate and validate the utility of the Sound Touch Viscoelastography(STVi) technique in patients with liver cirrhosis for noninvasive prediction of Portal hypertension (PH). The primary research questions it seeks to address are as follows: * What is the correlation between the liver STVi index and Portal Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG)? * Is STVi an available tool to non-invasively predict PH in patients with liver cirrhosis? And the effectiveness and practicality of STVi will be validated. * To establish a predictive model for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension (CSPH) utilizing liver STVi index as the primary indicator. The HVPG is considered as the gold standard in this study and STVi was employed to quantify the STVi index of the liver in patients with liver cirrhosis. Researchers will compare the two patients groups, HVPG≥10 mmHg and HVPG\<10 mmHg, to see the usage of STVi in the noninvasive prediction of PH.

We are currently conducting a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial entitled \*Preoperative Nasal Placement of Bowel Obstruction Catheter for Terminal Ileum Fecal Diversion versus Intraoperative Protective Ileostomy in Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Surgery for Mid-low Rectal Cancer\*. The study will be performed at 5-10 hospitals, with an anticipated enrollment of approximately 500 participants. The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University serves as the lead institution, and participating centers will enroll subjects on a competitive basis.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial will evaluate whether sequential tapering and discontinuation of beta-blockers is non-inferior to maintenance of the baseline stable beta-blocker dose in adult patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) who have achieved predefined clinical and hemodynamic stability during mavacamten treatment. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a sequential tapering and discontinuation group or a baseline stable-dose maintenance group. In the tapering group, the beta-blocker dose will be reduced stepwise approximately every 4 weeks, with complete discontinuation planned at Week 12 if predefined safety and stability criteria are met. Participants will be followed through Week 24. The primary objective is to compare the proportion of participants who maintain clinical and hemodynamic stability without protocol-defined treatment failure through Week 24. The feasibility and safety of complete beta-blocker discontinuation will also be evaluated.

This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study (OHAI-NMIBC-01) compares toripalimab plus sequential intravesical gemcitabine followed by mitomycin C (GEM→MMC) with toripalimab alone in adults with BCG-unresponsive or BCG-intolerant high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC). Two prespecified cohorts are analysed: (1) CIS cohort (CIS with/without Ta/T1) and (2) non-CIS cohort (high-risk Ta/T1 without CIS). In the combination arm, intravesical GEM→MMC is given weekly for 6 weeks (induction) and, for patients without recurrence at the first tumour assessment (\~month 3), monthly maintenance continues up to 24 months or until progression/unacceptable toxicity; toripalimab IV every 3 weeks starts during the first intravesical cycle and continues up to 24 months or until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The monotherapy arm receives toripalimab IV every 3 weeks up to 24 months or until progression/unacceptable toxicity. Cystoscopy and urine cytology are performed every 3 months; imaging every 24 weeks. Primary endpoints are 3-month complete response (CR) rate in the CIS cohort and median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the non-CIS cohort. Secondary endpoints include landmark CR, PFS and OS, RFS/HG-RFS landmarks in the non-CIS cohort, and safety (CTCAE v5.0). Exploratory analyses will assess outcomes by protocol-defined PD-L1 status. Approximately 106 participants will be enrolled at multiple sites in China.

This study is a multicenter retrospective clinical research, led by the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, and jointly conducted by other sub-centers. The aim is to develop an non-invasive artificial intelligence system for predicting the response and clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) to the treatment with atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab (T+A). In response to the clinical situation where approximately half of uHCC patients do not respond to the standard T+A therapy and traditional invasive biopsy is unable to fully reflect the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment, this study plans to retrospectively collect the data of 400 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from January 2020 to November 2025. The study will systematically summarize multi-dimensional data such as enhanced CT images within one month before treatment, baseline characteristics, serum markers, liver disease factors, and tumor stage. By integrating these clinical features with deep learning imageomics features extracted from images, the research team is dedicated to constructing and validating a safe, non-invasive, and reproducible prediction model, with the aim of achieving precise identification of the benefit population before implementing immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic treatment, and providing a powerful intelligent tool support for optimizing clinical treatment decisions and improving patient survival prognosis.

This study is a prospective, randomized, single-center randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of ondansetron in reducing the toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. This study plans to enroll 134 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are scheduled to receive standard ICI treatment. This study will adopt the 2023 CSCO Guidelines for the Management of Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related toxicity as the main assessment criterion, and take the incidence and severity of irAEs as the main observation indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of ondansetron in reducing the toxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

This observational study will develop and validate a large language model-assisted workflow for imaging cTNM staging annotation and uncertainty recognition in prostate cancer using Chinese PSMA PET/CT report texts generated during routine clinical care. The study will use de-identified report texts and necessary baseline clinical information only. No additional imaging examination, blood test, treatment, or follow-up visit will be assigned for this study. The main objective is to evaluate whether a locally or institutionally controlled large language model can identify report-derived imaging cT, cN, and cM categories, extract supporting evidence from the original report, and recognize uncertainty expressions. Model performance will be assessed using an internal independent validation set, external validation reports from two collaborating hospitals, and a prospective validation set of 100 consecutive routine PSMA PET/CT reports. A human-AI comparison will also be performed using physicians from urology and imaging-related specialties with different seniority levels.

To confirm that initiating Dotinurad for uric acid uric acid lowering during the acute phase of gout is non-inferior to initiating it after the acute phase of gout has subsided, and to analyze whether initiating Dotinurad treatment during the acute phase will increase the pain level, the recurrence rate of gout, and the inflammatory level of patients.

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Edaravone Dexborneol sublingual tablets in preventing late-onset epilepsy in patients with acute ischemic stroke at high risk. Eligible participants are adults aged 18-80 years with a confirmed diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke by clinical and imaging criteria (MRI or CT), enrolled within 48 hours of stroke onset. High risk for post-stroke epilepsy is defined as a SeLECT-EEG score ≥7. Patients must have no prior history of epilepsy or other central nervous system disorders associated with seizures. Key exclusion criteria include prior seizures before enrollment, recent stroke within the past 12 months, severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, significant cardiac insufficiency, drug hypersensitivity, pregnancy or lactation, and other conditions deemed unsuitable by investigators. A total of approximately 160 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Edaravone Dexborneol sublingual tablets or matching placebo. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome assessed within 2 years, defined as the occurrence of either: (1) definite clinical epileptic seizures, or (2) new-onset or worsening epileptiform EEG abnormalities (including IEDs, PDs, LRDAs) or electrographic seizures. Secondary endpoints include: incidence of individual components of the primary outcome; time to first seizure; characteristics, severity, and frequency of seizures; longitudinal changes and resolution rate of epileptiform EEG activity; cognitive function assessed by MoCA and MMSE; neurological outcomes evaluated by mRS and NIHSS; quality of life and functional independence measured by SSQOL and Barthel Index; recurrence of stroke and all-cause mortality; changes in inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, iNOS); and safety outcomes including treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. All efficacy and safety outcomes will be independently reviewed by a blinded adjudication committee. Statistical analyses will include chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical outcomes, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests for time-to-event data, and Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for potential confounders. The study period is planned from June 2026 to June 2030.

This research proposal outlines a multi-center, randomized, trial. Patients diagnosed with early-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Lecanemab. The study will run over a period of 24 months, with evaluations conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, 18 months and 24 months. Data from multiple omics layers will be integrated to assess both the efficacy and safety of the treatment. The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Lecanemab in patients with Alzheimer's Disease, leveraging multi-omics approaches. Specifically, the study will integrate data from OCT/OCTA imaging of the eye and MRI imaging of the brain, as well as cognitive measures such as ADAS-Cog, MoCA and CDR scores. Furthermore, the presence of ARIA-a significant safety concern in amyloid-targeting therapies-will be closely monitored. The study seeks to provide a more robust understanding of Lecanemab's impact on disease progression, cognition, and potential adverse effects, contributing to a more informed clinical application of this treatment in Alzheimer's care.

Nintedanib combined with or without Dextromethorphan for the treatment of IPF, with FVC as the primary efficacy endpoint to evaluate its effectivenes.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SP1000 and conventional laparoscopy in radical gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer.

Advanced liver and gallbladder malignancies (including liver cancer, cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) are a type of disease that is difficult to treat, and most patients have a short survival period. In recent years, immunotherapy (such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) has brought new hope to these patients, but still only a small number of patients can benefit. Research has found that approximately 40% of patients with liver and gallbladder tumors have symptoms of depression and anxiety, which not only affect their quality of life but may also reduce the therapeutic effect by influencing immune function. Fluoxetine is a commonly used antidepressant. The latest research shows that in addition to improving mood, it may also enhance the anti-tumor effect of immunotherapy. This study aims to explore whether fluoxetine combined with immunotherapy can better control tumors than immunotherapy alone, prolong the survival period of patients, and at the same time improve the depressive and anxious symptoms and quality of life of patients.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if CBG131 works to treat advanced gastric cancer or pancreatic cancer in adults whose tumors are CLDN18.2-positive. It will also learn about the safety of CBG131 and find the best dose to use. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is CBG131 safe, and what medical problems do participants have when receiving it? Does CBG131 shrink tumors in participants with CLDN18.2-positive cancers? How long do the CAR-T cells stay and work in the body? Researchers will test different doses of CBG131 to see which dose is safest and most effective. This is an early-stage trial, so there is no placebo group-everyone who joins will receive the actual treatment. Participants will: Have their blood cells collected through a procedure called leukapheresis (so the CAR-T cells can be made). Receive chemotherapy for 3 days to prepare their body for the CAR-T cells Get a single infusion of CBG131 CAR-T cells through an IV. Visit the clinic frequently for the first month, then regularly for 2 years for checkups, blood tests, and tumor assessments. Keep track of their symptoms and any side effects they experience.

In a single-center, prospective, phase II study (ClinicalTrials registration number: \[to be filled in\]) initiated by our center to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of short-course radiotherapy followed by sequential CAPOX chemotherapy combined with serplulimab and bevacizumab as total neoadjuvant therapy for MSS-type mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer, patients with mid-low MSS-type locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. They received short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPEOX, serplulimab, and bevacizumab as preoperative total neoadjuvant therapy. It is anticipated that 30 subjects with locally advanced rectal cancer will be enrolled between September 2025 and September 2027. This phase II exploratory study targets patients with locally advanced mid-low MSS/pMMR rectal cancer. It employs short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPEOX, serplulimab, and bevacizumab as preoperative total neoadjuvant therapy, aiming to clarify the efficacy and safety of this new combined radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy approach, while also assessing the rectal/anal preservation rate and quality of life of patients. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients will undergo imaging and endoscopic evaluations to determine subsequent treatment strategies. Radical surgical resection will be performed on patients after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, followed by further analysis of the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The primary study endpoint is the pCR rate, and secondary study endpoints include the objective response rate, organ preservation rate, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events, and quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CR29, Wexner).

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify whether the "dynamic dual-mode alignment optimization + intelligent precision knee-preserving system" (integrating static/kinematic target alignment, CT-based preoperative three-dimensional \[3D\] planning, 3D-printed guide plates, and intraoperative augmented reality \[AR\] real-time feedback) achieves a greater relative reduction in peak knee adduction moment (KAM) at 12 months postoperatively, while maintaining or improving knee clinical function and without increasing perioperative or long-term complication rates, compared with traditional knee-preserving strategies. The target population is patients aged 40-70 years with knee osteoarthritis (KOA; Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) who require high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for unilateral medial-compartment disease with mild-to-moderate varus deformity and who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main questions are: * Can the dynamic dual-mode alignment + intelligent precision system achieve a greater relative reduction in peak KAM at 12 months postoperatively than traditional knee-preserving strategies? * Can this system improve static alignment accuracy, dynamic load parameters (e.g., KAM impulse and varus thrust), and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores without increasing complication rates? * Can 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) guide plates and real-time AR feedback reduce intraoperative radiation exposure and shorten operative time compared with traditional methods? Researchers will compare: Kinematic alignment (KA), traditional mechanical alignment (MA), and dynamic dual-mode alignment (DA) to evaluate the relative performance of alignment strategies; 3D-printed PSI-guided HTO versus traditional fluoroscopy-guided HTO to assess the efficacy of PSI; and AR-assisted intraoperative adjustment versus traditional fluoroscopy-based adjustment to evaluate the precision of AR navigation. Participants will: * Complete preoperative assessments, including laboratory tests (complete blood count, biochemistry, coagulation), imaging (full-length, weight-bearing lower-limb radiographs; knee CT and/or MRI as indicated), 3D gait analysis (to measure KAM, KAM impulse, and varus thrust), and PRO assessments (KOOS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores) * Receive assigned surgical interventions: the DA group will undergo HTO guided by dual-mode alignment plus 3D-printed PSI and intraoperative AR feedback; the MA and KA groups will undergo HTO based on traditional or kinematic alignment, respectively; the traditional HTO group will undergo surgery relying on intraoperative fluoroscopy and surgeon experience. * Attend follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, including imaging to assess alignment accuracy and bone healing, gait analysis, PRO assessments, and complication monitoring. * Record medication use and rehabilitation compliance throughout the study period.

This clinical trial is evaluating a new, function-preserving surgical technique for patients with early-stage cancer in the upper part of the stomach. The current standard treatment is a Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy (LTG), which involves the complete removal of the stomach. This study compares the standard LTG with an innovative procedure called Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy combined with a novel anti-reflux reconstruction (LPG-tbROSF). This new technique removes only the cancerous upper portion of the stomach, aiming to preserve digestive functions and reduce post-surgery complications like acid reflux. The main goal is to see if patients who receive the new, stomach-preserving surgery experience less body weight loss one year after the procedure compared to those who undergo the standard total gastrectomy. The research will also compare the two surgeries in terms of post-operative quality of life, nutritional status, acid reflux symptoms, safety, and long-term cancer outcomes. The study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial that plans to enroll 120 patients with localized cancer in the upper stomach.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. The study plans to enroll treatment-naïve HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients aged 18-75 with high-risk features (e.g., tumor size ≥3 cm or lymph node positivity, Ki-67 ≥20%). Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: the control group will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin + cyclophosphamide) in combination with sintilimab immunotherapy; the experimental group will receive the same chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimen with the addition of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) administered early during treatment, at a prescribed dose of 8 Gy per fraction for 3 fractions, with one fraction per day. The study has dual primary endpoints: pathological complete response (pCR,) and objective response rate (ORR ). Secondary endpoints include 3-year event-free survival (EFS), incidence of adverse events (CTCAE v5.0), and postoperative cosmetic outcomes of the breast. The study design incorporates hierarchical testing to control for multiplicity, and long-term follow-up is planned to evaluate survival benefits. The study has been approved by the ethics committee, and all participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results are expected to offer a novel neoadjuvant treatment strategy for high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients and improve their therapeutic outcomes.