Clinical trials

Head and neck lymphedema is a common complication after treatment for head and neck cancer. It can cause swelling of the face and neck, discomfort, reduced neck and jaw mobility, swallowing difficulties, and a negative impact on quality of life. One usual treatment approach includes manual lymphatic drainage, exercises, skin care, and the use of a compression garment worn for several hours each day. However, wearing a compression garment for a long period may be difficult for patients because of discomfort, appearance, social constraints, or practical limitations, which may reduce adherence to treatment. The ARAGORN study aims to determine whether a more autonomous rehabilitation program, based on patient education, self-drainage, targeted exercises, and short-duration compression bandaging performed twice daily, leads to better treatment adherence than the usual recommended approach using prolonged compression garment wear. The main question of the study is whether patients receiving the autonomous, guided rehabilitation program are more likely to adhere to their prescribed lymphedema treatment over the radiotherapy period than patients receiving the usual recommended care. The study hypothesis is that a patient-centered, self-management approach may improve adherence by making treatment easier to integrate into daily life, while maintaining potential benefits on swelling, symptoms, function, and quality of life.

Dysphagia can reach a prevalence of up to 80% in intensive care patients. The implementation or prolonged presence of medical devices such as the intubation tube, tracheostomy, or nasogastric tube alters the physiology of swallowing and causes local injuries at several levels. Additionally, certain medical treatments impair swallowing physiology and the patient's alertness, further promoting the development of these disorders. Management of dysphagia involves two main types of strategies: adaptive or compensatory maneuvers and rehabilitation techniques such as: performing praxis or swallowing exercises; physical stimulation (tactile or thermal); transcranial stimulation (electrical or magnetic); and finally, pharyngeal or transcutaneous electrical stimulation (NMES). Patients hospitalized in intensive care often present with altered levels of alertness, asynchronous ventilation and swallowing, and reduced motor capabilities, making it difficult to perform techniques like praxis, food trials, or resistance swallowing exercises. NMES does not require active patient cooperation or the permanent presence of the therapist during the stimulation session, thus increasing the intensity of dysphagia rehabilitation and the early implementation of treatment in these patients, complementing conventional rehabilitation. Muscle and sensory stimulation through the application of NMES can help increase the strength of the muscles involved in swallowing and improve sensory capabilities. However, its effects have not yet been evaluated in tracheostomized patients undergoing weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Swallowing Disorders (SD) is commonly observed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Disruption to the upper airway by way of a tracheostomy may lead to physiological and/or biomechanical changes to the swallow, thereby increasing dysphagia risk. SD is independently associated with adverse outcomes including respiratory complications, nutritional compromise, and even death. Experts recommend a systematic bedside screening. Most algorithms include the water swallow test followed by expert comprehensive swallowing assessments of screening positive patients. However, the clinical examination lacks precision. Complementary examinations, such as videofluoroscopy or Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES), are irradiating or invasive, consume numerous resources and are difficult to access. No current consensus exists on how to best approach to evaluate ICU patients at risk. In this context, US imaging has garnered increased interest for assessing swallowing disorders. Recognised for its non-invasive nature and its ability to overcome conventional constraints, this approach, enabling both qualitative and quantitative analysis of multiple structures, would enhance the precision in targeting structures for rehabilitation. The researchers intend to create an ultrasound diagnostic model for difficult-to-wean trahceostomised patients. Additionally, they aim to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of this model. During an nineteen-months period, we will enrolled one hundred and nineteen difficult-to-wean tracheostomised patients at Forcilles's Hospital, Universitary Hospital of Dijon, Béthune Hospital and Bourgon Jallieu Hospital. All patients will have a FEES evaluation. The ultrasonographer will be blinded to the patient's status and prior clinical or imaging assessments. Ultrasound assessment will focus on evaluating the movements or morphology of structures such as the tongue, laryngeal movement, or suprahyoid muscles. A global ultrasound diagnostic model will be developed after selecting variables in logistic multivariable regression. Its sensitivity and specificity and prediction value will be estimated. The constructed model will be transformed in an easy-to-use scoring system. The study anticipates establishing an association between ultrasound markers and swallowing disorders, aiming to enhance early detection for tailored management strategies, providing a non-invasive alternative to videofluoroscopy or FEES.

Tapia syndrome is a rare and poorly understood pathology. It is defined by a concomitant attack of the recurrent (branch of X) and hypoglossal (XII) nerves of peripheral or central origin. It is characterized by the paralysis of a vocal cord and the ipsilateral half of tongue. This damage is most often unilateral but it can also be bilateral. It results in dysphonia and swallowing disorders. Tapia syndrome is a rare and poorly understood pathology. To date, less than 100 cases have been described in the literature. Previous works are mainly case reports and literature reviews. No prevalence study has been performed to date. Furthermore, disagreements persist regarding the semiology. Indeed, the involvement of the soft palate is not always described.