Clinical trials

Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Excisional hemorrhoidectomy is the standard procedure. There are two main options: without wound closure (Milligan-Morgan technique) and with wound closure (Ferguson technique). Both options are effective in the long term and cause severe postoperative pain, although comparative studies between Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy have shown that the Ferguson technique is associated with less postoperative pain and better early wound healing, while maintaining similar long-term efficacy. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has scarcely been explored in anal surgery. Its potential advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it entails a learning curve and may initially prolong operative time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. IDEAL phase 2a focuses on the optimization and technical definition of a surgical innovation, emphasizing continuous improvement based on real clinical practice and laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies. Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy have been identified, the investigators propose a phase 2a IDEAL study to assess the reproducibility of this minimally invasive adaptation. The investigators hypothesize that incorporating MIS into the Ferguson technique could further reduce postoperative pain and accelerate recovery, while preserving the well-established effectiveness of closed hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoidal disease.

The goal of this clinical trial is to study whether the minimally invasive approach in the mucosal advancement flap technique for the treatment of complex perianal fistula improves the healing rate compared to non-minimally invasive surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: \- Does the healing rate of patients undergoing minimally invasive approach in the mucosal advancement flap technique improve compared to patients undergoing non-minimally invasive surgery? Researchers will also compare minimally invasive approach in the mucosal advancement flap technique to the non-minimally invasive approach in terms of postoperative pain, fecal incontinence and healing time. Quality of life and global morbidity will also be analyzed. Participants will: * Undergo surgical treatment of complex perianal fistula performed by mucosal advancement flap performed by a minimally invasive technique. * Attend control visits and fill in symptom forms one week, one month, three months and six months after the surgical procedure.

Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher Grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH), based on the Ferguson technique, is one of the standard procedures. Although effective in the long term, it causes severe postoperative pain. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has not yet been explored in anal surgery. Its advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it presents a learning curve and an initially longer surgical time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. The IDEAL phase 2a is aimed at the optimization and technical definition of surgical innovation with a focus on continuous improvement based on real clinical practice, laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies. Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in CEH have been found, the investigators propose a study within Stage 2A of the IDEAL model to assess the reproducibility of this technique. The investigators believe its incorporation into closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy could result in less postoperative pain and faster patient recovery.

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis experience meaningful and long-term improvement in pain, function, and analgesic use after ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular nerves following a double diagnostic genicular nerve blocks.