Clinical trials

Exploring the efficacy and safety of firmonertinib combined with anlotinib and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with EGFR-mutant resectable NSCLC

This is a prospective, single-center diagnostic study testing whether a new, minimally invasive analysis of nipple fluid can distinguish benign from malignant causes of pathologic nipple discharge. Many patients with bloody or blood-tinged nipple discharge undergo surgery to make a diagnosis, yet most are ultimately found to have benign disease. The investigators aim to develop a laboratory test that analyzes DNA in nipple fluid to help avoid unnecessary operations while still identifying cancers. Approximately 30 adults with spontaneous, single-duct, unilateral bloody or serosanguinous nipple discharge who are already scheduled for standard diagnostic surgery will be enrolled at Hubei Cancer Hospital. Before surgery, the investigators will collect a small sample of nipple fluid (or gently obtain nipple aspirate fluid using a soft suction cup if needed) and one tube of blood. The investigators will analyze the fluid's DNA using two approaches: low-pass whole-genome analysis to look for copy number changes and fragmentation patterns, and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. Surgical pathology will serve as the reference standard. Using these data, the investigators will build and validate a model to classify lesions as benign or malignant. The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity). Secondary outcomes include positive and negative predictive values, model calibration, subgroup performance (e.g., ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive cancer), and an estimate of potential clinical impact (for example, how many benign cases might safely avoid surgery at a high-sensitivity threshold). Study test results will not affect current clinical care; all participants will receive usual evaluation and surgery. Risks are minimal and may include brief nipple discomfort or skin irritation from gentle suction and routine blood-draw risks (bruising, lightheadedness). There is no direct benefit to participants, but the findings may support a future noninvasive test to guide care and reduce unnecessary surgery. Data will be de-identified and stored securely. Expected enrollment is from September 2025 to May 2026.

Background: Pyrotinib is an effective targeted drug for HER2-positive breast cancer, but it very frequently causes diarrhea, which can be severe enough to disrupt treatment and reduce patients' quality of life. The reason why some patients develop diarrhea while others do not is not well understood. Recent research suggests that the community of bacteria in the gut (gut microbiota) may play a key role in this side effect. What is the purpose of this study? This is an observational study (Phase 1) that aims to understand the relationship between pyrotinib treatment, changes in gut bacteria, and the occurrence of diarrhea. The main goal is to compare the gut bacteria of patients who develop diarrhea while taking pyrotinib with those who do not. Researchers hope to identify specific bacteria that might protect against diarrhea, which could lead to new ways to prevent or treat this side effect in the future. What will happen in the study? Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who are being treated with pyrotinib will be invited to participate. They will be divided into two groups: those who experience diarrhea and those who do not. Participants will provide stool samples at specific time points (e.g., 2 and 4 weeks after starting pyrotinib). They will also allow researchers to collect information from their medical records about their clinical condition and diarrhea symptoms. No experimental intervention will be administered in this phase of the study; all patients will receive standard medical care. Potential Benefits: Participants will not receive any direct benefit from this observational phase of the study. However, the information gathered may help scientists better understand pyrotinib-induced diarrhea and develop future strategies to help other breast cancer patients manage this side effect more effectively.

Why is this study being done? Many patients with a type of breast cancer (called HR-positive) take a medicine called Abemaciclib. While this medicine is effective, a very common side effect is diarrhea, which can be severe enough to disrupt treatment and reduce quality of life. The reason why some patients get diarrhea and others do not is not well understood. This study aims to investigate whether the natural bacteria living in the gut (known as the gut microbiome) play a role in this side effect. Researchers will compare the gut bacteria of patients who develop diarrhea with those who do not. What will happen in the study? This is an observational study, which means that patients will receive their normal cancer treatment and will not be given any new or experimental drugs as part of this initial phase. * Patients who are already being treated with Abemaciclib will be invited to join. * They will be placed into one of two groups: those who experience diarrhea and those who do not. * Participants will be asked to provide stool (feces) samples and may also provide optional blood samples at specific times during their treatment. * Researchers will analyze these samples in the lab to study the types and functions of the gut bacteria. Who can participate? * Adult women (aged 18-75) diagnosed with HR-positive breast cancer. * Currently receiving treatment with Abemaciclib for at least 2 weeks. * Must be willing to provide informed consent and follow the study procedures. What are the potential benefits? Participants will not receive any direct medical benefit from taking part in this study. However, the information learned may help researchers better understand why diarrhea occurs and, in the future, could lead to new ways to prevent or treat this side effect for other cancer patients. How is privacy protected? All personal information and samples collected will be de-identified using a unique code. This means that the data used for analysis cannot be directly linked back to the participant's identity. All data is stored securely according to strict ethical guidelines.

Brief Summary This observational study will follow patients who undergo DIEP flap breast reconstruction to better understand a common surgical challenge called ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. I/R injury can happen when a flap has a period without blood flow (ischemia) and then blood flow returns (reperfusion). This process may trigger inflammation and oxidative stress and is associated with fat necrosis or partial flap loss. 1\. What is being studied 1. The investigators will measure inflammation and oxidative stress markers in blood (for example, interleukin-6 \[IL-6\]) from before surgery through the first 72 hours after surgery. 2. These data will help map the normal and abnormal patterns of recovery after surgery and may inform future approaches to monitoring and protecting flap tissue. 3. No experimental drug or device is given to participants in this study. Separate animal studies are developing a near-infrared imaging and antioxidant nanomaterial (Mn/QD-SAC); this is not used in participants here. 2\. Who can take part 1. Women aged 18-70 scheduled for immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. 2. Key exclusions include severe heart, liver, or kidney disease; significant clotting problems; active infection or autoimmune disease; long-term use of immunosuppressants/anti-inflammatory drugs; pregnancy or breastfeeding; or other reasons judged by the research team. 3\. What will happen if you join 1. After providing informed consent, participants will have blood drawn at five time points: pre-operative baseline (within 24 hours before surgery) and at 0, 6, 24, and 72 hours after surgery (about 10 mL each time; total \~50 mL). 2. Blood will be processed and stored under secure conditions and tested for inflammation and oxidative stress markers. 3. The investigators will also record routine clinical information from the medical record (such as age, BMI, surgery duration, ischemia time, and clinical assessments of flap outcomes and complications). 4. Participation does not change the participant's clinical care before, during, or after surgery. 4\. Risks and benefits 1. Risks are those of standard blood draws: brief pain, bruising, bleeding, dizziness, and rare infection. 2. There is no direct medical benefit to participants. Results may help improve understanding and future care for patients undergoing flap reconstruction. 5\. Privacy and data protection 1. Samples and data will be coded without names. Identifying information is stored separately with restricted access. 2. Research results are not routinely added to the medical record or returned to participants unless a finding has clear, actionable clinical significance and is approved by the ethics committee. 6\. Time commitment and costs 1. All blood draws occur during the routine hospital stay. There is no additional follow-up required after discharge. 2. There is no cost to participate. 7\. Voluntary participation Joining the study is voluntary. Participants may withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care.

Relationship between pain and the efficacy of immunotherapy: Does the degree of pain control affect the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs? Does the use of opioid drugs independently affect the efficacy of immunotherapy?

Studies have indicated that the improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) is significantly correlated with luminal breast cancer patients' overall survival (OS). Patients with luminal breast cancer have poor efficacy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy has been demonstrated to enhance the pCR rate of luminal-type breast cancer patients, increasing it from 13-15% to approximately 24%. Therefore, how to further improve the pCR rate of luminal-type breast cancer became the main objective of this study. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) not only kills tumor cells directly, but also kills the distant unirradiated tumor cells by promoting the cross-initiation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect. Our research team has recently discovered that the triple therapy model of SBRT + anti-vascular targeting + anti-PD-1 was safe and efficacious in lung cancer patients. Ivonescimab (AK112) is an anti-PD-1/VEGF-A bispecific antibody. In order to improve the pCR, a single-arm, open, phase II clinical study was proposed to explore the safety and efficacy of SBRT+AK112+chemotherapy, a neoadjuvant treatment modality, in the treatment of luminal breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy(NART) followed by mastectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction is feasible and technically safe. However, reports of NACT followed immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are rare. Some studies have shown that NART followed immediate implant-based breast reconstruction seems feasible and can be safely attempted. It's well known that radiotherapy after implant-based breast reconstruction have negative effects on implant and cosmetic results. So, investigators conducted a polit study to learn about acute post-surgical complications following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after NART.

Studies have indicated that the improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) is significantly correlated with triple-negative breast cancer（TNBC）patients' overall survival (OS). Patients with TNBC have poor efficacy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of neoadjuvant therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy has been demonstrated to enhance the pCR rate of TNBC patients, increasing it from 45% to approximately 60%. Therefore, how to further improve the pCR rate of TNBC breast cancer became the main objective of this study. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) not only kills tumor cells directly, but also kills the distant unirradiated tumor cells by promoting the cross-initiation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect. Our research team has recently discovered that the triple therapy model of SBRT + anti-vascular targeting + anti-PD-1 was safe and efficacious in lung cancer patients. Cadonilimab (AK104) is an PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody. In order to improve the pCR, a single-arm, open, phase II clinical study was proposed to explore the safety and efficacy of SBRT+AK104+chemotherapy, a neoadjuvant treatment modality, in the treatment of TNBC.

The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate the effects of different surgical approaches on the recurrence rate and aesthetic outcome of patients with granulomatous mastitis. The patients were divided into traditional surgery group and plastic surgery group.

The aim of this randomized study is to investigate pneumonitis, local tumor control, and survival outcomes of primary tumor radiotherapy omitting CTV for patients with advanced NSCLC responded to immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality among men in the world. The proportion of elderly lung cancer patients in the global lung cancer population is steadily increasing, at the same time, it is also the age group with the highest lung cancer mortality, but there is little evidence for treatment of elderly lung cancer patients. In this study, the investigators set the definition of the elderly to 65 years and older. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy were higher than those of chemotherapy alone, which established the dominant position of dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Studies showed that elderly patients benefit from immunotherapy. It is controversial whether elderly advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) patients should receive single-drug chemotherapy or dual-drug chemotherapy. MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies show that in the advanced NSCLC elderly patients, combined with cisplatin on the basis of single drug chemotherapy can not significantly prolong OS, and can not improve the overall health status of patients. Based on the results of this study, single drug chemotherapy is still the preferred first-line regimen. Another study showed that carboplatin combined with paclitaxel had longer OS than gemcitabine or vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with a performance status (PS) score of less than 2. In the era of immunotherapy, it is not clear whether single-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy can achieve the same therapeutic effect as dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-drug chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in elderly metastatic NSCLC patients.

Radical radiotherapy is critical for locally advanced non small cell lung cancer(NSCLC ). Our previous sturdy indicated that patients who received induction immunotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy suffered higher proportion of pneumonitis.Grade 2 or more pneumonitis patients have worse prognosis. It is urged to optimize the radiotherapy dose and target volume for patients treated with immunotherapy and radiotherapy. According to retrospective and prospective studies, omitting CTV radiation is feasible for patients undergoing concurrent radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. It is postulated that omitting CTV radiation for patients responded to induction therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy will have less pneumonitis without sacrificing the local control rate. Omitting CTV may also retain better immune function which will facilitate the immunotherapy.

The aim of this randomized study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ondanstron weekly with every 3 weeks for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy combined with PD-1 blockade.