Clinical trials

The KPAP vs AirSense 11 with EPR study is a randomized, crossover study in which treatment efficacy will be compared between SleepRes APAP + KPAP and ResMed APAP + EPR. Participants will be chosen from those with a formal OSA diagnosis (following an in-lab polysomnogram, a split-night study or a home sleep apnea test) within the past 2 years and on PAP therapy. Upon signing an informed consent, participants will be randomized to the order of study and which device will be used first: APAP + KPAP (delivered by a SleepRes device) or APAP + EPR (delivered by a ResMed device). Participants will be blinded to the sequence order. They will then be invited to the laboratory for two overnight sleep studies, one on each treatment device, in the order determined by the randomization. Prior to each overnight, they will have to observe withdrawal of their home PAP treatment for 3 nights. The KPAP drop will be set to the maximum level (i.e., 5 cmH2O), while EPR will be set on 3. APAP from both manufacturers will be set on a 5-20 cmH2O pressure range. The next morning of each sleep study, participants will be administered visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires to examine subjective sleep quality (1=best sleep quality; 10=worst sleep quality) and, after all studies are completed, a device subjective preference (1=APAP+KPAP was extremely better than APAP+EPR; 10=the opposite). The study will be single blinded with both the participants (the device will be concealed in the laboratory so that participants will not be able to understand what treatment they are on) and the registered technician scoring the polysomnograms (by an independent scoring partner, Sleep Strategies) blinded to treatment allocation.

The KPAP EPR is a randomized, crossover study in which treatment efficacy will be compared between SleepRes CPAP + KPAP and ResMed CPAP + EPR. Participants will be chosen from those with a recent OSA diagnosis (following an in-lab polysomnogram, a split-night study or a home sleep apnea test) and with no previous use of OS therapy (PAP-naïve). Upon signing an informed consent, participants will be scheduled to come to the sleep laboratory for a manual titration on CPAP. Once the therapeutic pressure is determined, participants will be randomized to start either CPAP + KPAP (delivered by a SleepRes device) or CPAP + EPR (delivered by a ResMed device). Participants will be blinded to the sequence order. They will then be invited to the laboratory for two overnight sleep studies, one on each treatment device, in the order determined by the randomization, with a minimum washout of 1 week and a maximum of 3 weeks. Both studies will use the therapeutic pressure determined during manual titration. The KPAP drop will be set to the maximum level (i.e., 5 cmH2O), while EPR will be set on 3. The next morning of each sleep study, participants will be administered visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires to examine subjective sleep quality (1=best sleep quality; 10=worst sleep quality) and, after all studies are completed a device subjective preference (1=CPAP+KPAP was extremely better than CPAP+EPR; 10=the opposite). The study will be single blinded with both the participants (the device will be concealed in the laboratory so that participants will not be able to understand what treatment they are on) and the registered technician scoring the polysomnographies blinded to treatment allocation.

A device able to provide less positive airway pressure (PAP) for the entire duration of inspiration and roughly half the duration of expiration, designated KPAP, is being developed by SleepRes for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In prior studies, the administration of higher inspiratory than expiratory PAP did not substantially increase treatment efficacy or adherence to continuous PAP (CPAP), which remains low. In our recent investigation, we demonstrated that the addition of a resistor to the CPAP circuit to reduce inspiratory PAP increased subjective comfort. In another study, we showed that KPAP improved subjective comfort during wakefulness vs. fixed CPAP, while maintaining treatment efficacy. The present study, KPAP Adherence 1, is a randomized, crossover study designed to examine whether KPAP can improve adherence over APAP as an at home treatment for OSA.

The KPAP EPR Home is a randomized, crossover study in which subjective comfort will be compared between SleepRes APAP + KPAP and ResMed APAP + EPR. Participants will be individuals with newly diagnosed OSA who have not previously tried any PAP treatment (PAP-naïve). Upon signing an informed consent, participants will be randomized to receiving either APAP + KPAP (delivered by a SleepRes device) or APAP + EPR (delivered by a ResMed device) for home use. Participants will be asked to use the devices (in the order of randomization) for 4 days each, with 3 days of washout in between. Participants will be blinded to the sequence order, even though they will receive machines that are not identical at each treatment. The KPAP drop will be set to the maximum level (i.e., 5 cmH2O), while EPR will be set on 3. APAP will be set on the full pressure range (i.e., 5-20 cmH2O). After each period, each individual will be asked to rate their device preference according to a 10-point visual analog (VAS) scale (i.e., 1=extremely uncomfortable treatment; 10=extremely comfortable treatment). After usage, the devices will be returned to the office and device data will be downloaded.