Clinical trials

It is designed to compare two different strengths of cholesterol-lowering treatment in patients who have narrowing of blood vessels inside the brain (intracranial atherosclerosis) but do not currently have symptoms such as stroke. The purpose of this study is to find out whether more intensive cholesterol-lowering treatment provides better protection against future vascular events, such as stroke, compared to moderate treatment. Cholesterol, especially LDL cholesterol, is known to contribute to the buildup of plaques in blood vessels, which can lead to serious complications. Participants in this study are adults diagnosed with asymptomatic intracranial arterial narrowing. Because they do not yet have symptoms, this study aims to prevent future problems before they occur. This is a multicenter study, meaning it is conducted at multiple hospitals. It is prospective, so participants are followed over time. It is also randomized, which means participants are assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) into one of two groups. One group receives moderate-intensity cholesterol-lowering therapy, while the other receives high-intensity therapy. The study is open-label, meaning both doctors and patients know which treatment is being given. Participants will undergo regular follow-up visits during the study. These visits may include blood tests, imaging studies, and clinical assessments to monitor cholesterol levels, blood vessel condition, and overall health. The researchers will track whether participants experience any vascular events, such as stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The study will also monitor safety. Any side effects or adverse reactions to the medications will be carefully recorded. This ensures that both the effectiveness and safety of the treatments are evaluated.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) has not been established in randomized controlled trials. Current practice largely extrapolates from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials, but anatomical and procedural differences between coronary and carotid arteries limit the validity of this approach. The CHET trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, superiority trial designed to compare two DAPT durations after CAS in patients at HBR. After CAS, all eligible patients receive aspirin (100 mg daily) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) for a 30-day enrichment period. Patients who remain free of net clinical events at day 30 are randomized 1:1 to either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT; aspirin 100 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg daily, at the treating physician's discretion) for 11 months, or continued DAPT for 11 months. The primary hypothesis is that abbreviated DAPT followed by SAPT is superior to prolonged DAPT in reducing clinically significant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium \[BARC\] type 2, 3, or 5) from 30 days to 12 months after CAS, while maintaining noninferiority in net clinical outcomes (composite of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and major bleeding \[BARC type 3 or 5\]). A total of 1,556 participants (778 per group) will be enrolled across multiple comprehensive stroke centers in the Republic of Korea. Patients will be followed at 5 and 11 months after randomization, with subsequent annual follow-up (in-person or by telephone) until study completion to capture long-term clinical events.