A Comparison Between Two Laparoscopic Techniques in Management of Inguinal Hernias in Pediatrics
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age1-18
SponsorAssiut University
About this trial
To compare between the use of the percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique and the Laparoscopic intraperitoneal purse-string suture sac closure technique. in pediatrics \& evaluate the safety, efficacy feasibility ,operative time ,postoperative pain ,recurrence rate of both approaches.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
1. Age 1month to 18 years. 2. Denovo Inguinal Hernias. 3. Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernias.
Disqualifiers
1. Complicated Inguinal Hernia 2. Age more than 18 Years 3. cases inwhich laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated 4. cases with collagen disease. 5. Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Laparscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique in Management of inguinal hernia
Procedure/SurgeryLaparscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique
Laparscopic inguinal herniotomy in pediatrics
Procedure/SurgeryLaparoscopic intraperitoneal purse string suture sac closure technique in pediatrics.
Treatment groups
50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Laparscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique in Management of inguinal herniaActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal purse string suture sac closure technique in pediatrics.Active comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Operative time in both approaches
time from start of operation to the end
Time frame
baselineLocations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Assiut University
Lead sponsor
Advanced Bionics
Sponsor institution
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: