Acute Effects of Different Warm-Up Protocols in Amateur Basketball Players

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age15-25
SponsorIstanbul Medipol University Hospital

About this trial

Brief Summary This randomized controlled trial will compare the immediate effects of three warm-up protocols on physical performance in male amateur basketball players. A total of 45 licensed basketball players aged 15 to 25 years will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: standard dynamic warm-up, dynamic warm-up followed by classical hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching, or dynamic warm-up followed by short-duration self-administered PNF stretching.

The main outcome will be the change in countermovement jump height. Additional outcomes will include flexibility, knee range of motion, squat jump height, 20-meter sprint time, agility, dynamic balance, and perceived exertion. Measurements will be performed before the assigned warm-up protocol, immediately after the protocol, and 15 minutes after the protocol.

The study aims to determine whether short-duration self-PNF stretching can improve flexibility while preserving performance more effectively than classical PNF stretching. Each participant will complete the assigned protocol and all assessments during a single study session.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Male

Aged 15-25 years

Licensed amateur basketball player

Minimum 2 years of basketball experience

Disqualifiers

Acute lower-extremity muscle, tendon, ligament, or bone injury

Knee, hip, or ankle surgery within the past 6 months

History of major ligament, meniscal, or Achilles tendon injury

Lumbar disc herniation, sciatica, peripheral nerve injury, or neurological disorder

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Standard Dynamic Warm-Up
  • Classical Hold-Relax PNF Stretching
  • Short-Duration Self-PNF Stretching

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups