Added-Sugars Warning Label PSAs

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-120
SponsorUniversity of California, Davis

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if exposure to language-matched English-Spanish public service announcements (PSAs) can increase the understanding of and response to added-sugars menu warning labels among U.S. Hispanic adults. The hypothesis is that the experimental PSAs educating consumers about a new added-sugars menu label will significantly improve understanding of the label and reduce grams of added sugars in meals ordered from menus displaying the label. Participants will be recruited and randomized to one of two arms: (1) Control Arm: Viewing PSAs stating that using a phone while driving is dangerous or (2) Intervention Arm: Viewing PSAs informing participants about new added-sugars menu labels. Within the intervention arm, participants will be randomized to view one of three PSA themes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18 years of age or older

Residence in the United States

Hispanic ethnicity

Ability to read English and/or Spanish

Disqualifiers

Failing attention check question

Speeding (finishing survey in <33% of the median completion time, which is calculated based on survey times from those who completed the survey and did not fail the attention check once 90% of the target sample has been recruited)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Labels are coming soon

    Behavioral

    Viewing 2 PSAs with a "labels are coming soon" theme that contain an added-sugars warning label and a statement stating that chain restaurant menus must place warning labels on items that contain or exceed the recommended daily limit of added sugars.

  • Hidden sugars in restaurant foods

    Behavioral

    Viewing 2 PSAs with a "hidden sugars in restaurant foods" theme that contain an added-sugars warning label and a statement stating that chain restaurant menus must place warning labels on items that contain or exceed the recommended daily limit of added sugars.

  • Negative health outcomes

    Behavioral

    Viewing 2 PSAs with a "negative health outcomes" theme that contain an added-sugars warning label and a statement stating that chain restaurant menus must place warning labels on items that contain or exceed the recommended daily limit of added sugars.

  • Safe Driving (control)

    Behavioral

    Viewing 2 PSAs with a "safe driving" theme that contain a statement stating that using a phone while driving is a distraction and puts lives at risk.

Treatment groups

2,000 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Safe Driving PSAPlacebo comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Added-sugars label PSAExperimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Noticing, recall, and understanding of the added sugar menu label

Noticing, recall, and understanding (hereafter, "noticing") of an added-sugars nutrient label where participants will be asked if they noticed any menu labels. If "Yes", participants would be asked what the warning label told them about (e.g., added sugars), and if answered "added sugars", what about added sugars (e.g., high amount of added sugars). If the three answers were "Yes", "Added sugars", and "high amount of added sugars", the dichotomous variable would be correct. Otherwise, the variable would be classified as incorrect. This outcome will be compared between the experimental PSA arm and the control PSA arm and between each of the three PSA intervention themes. Analysis will use Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Adapted from doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108038.

Time frame
Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
2

Grams of added sugar ordered

After the intervention, participants will place hypothetical meal orders from 2 realistic menus, shown in random order, that display an added-sugars warning label next to items containing ≥100% of the Daily Value for added sugars and a disclosure statement explaining the label's meaning. Added-sugars data will be estimated using restaurant website nutritional information. Analyses will use linear regression. Adapted from doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108038.

Time frame
Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure

Secondary outcomes

1

Noticing, recall, and understanding the PSAs

Noticing, recall, and understanding (hereafter, "noticing") of added-sugars PSAs where participants will be asked if they noticed any PSAs with response options "yes", "no", or "not sure". Then, participants will be asked what the previously viewed PSAs told them about. Response options include safe driving, covid-19 testing, labels for added sugars, calories labels, fruits and vegetables, exercise, how to filter water, labels indicating healthy food, "none of these options", or "I do not recall seeing a public service announcement (PSA)". If answers are "yes" and "labels for added sugars", respectively, the variable would be coded as correct and otherwise, incorrect. Analysis will use Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Adapted from doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.108038.

Time frame
Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
2

Reported use of added-sugars label when selecting food items

If participants answer "yes" to the label noticing measure and correctly recall the nutrition label, they will be asked, "Did you use the label when deciding which food to select?" Response options will be "yes" or "no". The dichotomous outcome of reported use will be analyzed using Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Adapted from doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(26)00027-7.

Time frame
Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
3

Selection of a food item high in added sugars for themselves

In a hypothetical menu ordering task, participants will select a food they would purchase for themselves. A dichotomous outcome (ordered high added-sugars item vs. did not order high added-sugars item) will be used. Analysis will use Poisson regression with robust standard errors. Adapted from doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(26)00027-7.

Time frame
Within approximately 5 minutes of intervention exposure
4

Perceived message effectiveness of label

Adapted 1-item UNC PME scale specifically regarding the added-sugars warning label (i.e., discourage) with a 5-point scale from 1= not at all to 5= a great deal \[the higher the score, the higher the perceived effectiveness\]. Responses will be treated as a continuous outcome in linear regression. Adapted from doi: 10.1093/abm/kay080.

Time frame
Within approximately 10 minutes of intervention exposure

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: