Augmentation of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Reimplantation of Subacromial Bursa Tissue and Platelet-Rich Plasma

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens

About this trial

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the biological enhancement of the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with stem cells from the acromial bursa and PRP in individuals who undergo arthroscopic cuff repair The main question it aims to answer is:

Do the stems cells from the acromial bursa and PRP promote healing and produce better results in arthroscopic cuff repair? Researchers will compare this population to three others the first do bnot receive any biological enchancement, the second receive only stem cells and the third receive only PRP to see if there are any differences.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Subacromial Bursa Tissue Reimplantation

    Biological/Vaccine

    Autologous minced subacromial bursal tissue harvested arthroscopically using a tissue collection device and applied at the bone-tendon interface immediately after rotator cuff repair.

  • Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

    Procedure/Surgery

    Standard arthroscopic repair of full-thickness isolated supraspinatus tendon tears using suture anchors.

  • Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections

    Biological/Vaccine

    Autologous platelet-rich plasma prepared from preoperatively collected peripheral blood and applied at the bone-tendon interface immediately after repair completion.

  • Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl)

    Other intervention

    Three milliliters of sterile normal saline applied at the bone-tendon interface immediately after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair as placebo comparator.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: GROUP AExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: GROUP BExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: GROUP CExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group D: GROUP DPlacebo comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Functional Outcome Assessed by Constant-Murley Score and ASES Score

The primary outcome measure will be the functional outcome of the shoulder assessed using the Constant-Murley Score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Both scores are validated instruments evaluating pain, daily activities, and shoulder function, with higher scores indicating better clinical outcomes.

Time frame
The primary outcome measure will be the functional outcome of the shoulder assessed using the Constant-Murley Score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Both scores are validated instruments ev

Secondary outcomes

1

Rotator Cuff Tendon Integrity Assessed by MRI (Sugaya Classification)

Tendon integrity will be evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months postoperatively. Repair integrity will be classified according to the Sugaya classification system and categorized to assess healing or re-tear.

Time frame
12 months postoperatively
2

Pain Intensity Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Time frame
3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
3

Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by SF-12

Quality of life will be evaluated using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The questionnaire provides physical and mental health composite scores.

Time frame
3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
4

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale from 0 to 10 at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame
3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: