About this trial
ACE-AF is a multicenter randomized study in people aged 78 years and older with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is a common heart rhythm disorder in older adults and can cause reduced quality of life and lead to serious complications such as stroke and heart failure.
The study compares two established treatment strategies:
1. Catheter ablation (an invasive procedure aimed at reducing AF by electrically isolating triggers in the heart, primarily through pulmonary vein isolation), and 2. Optimized medical therapy without AF ablation (medications for rate and/or rhythm control; AV node ablation with pacemaker may be used if clinically indicated according to routine care).
Participants are randomized 1:1 to one of these strategies. All participants will receive an implantable loop recorder (a small heart rhythm monitor placed under the skin) to continuously track heart rhythm and measure AF burden over time.
The study has two primary endpoints, tested with Holm-Bonferroni multiplicity control assessed over 24 months:
1. a composite of major clinical events (all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, cardiac arrest, or hospitalization due to heart failure), and 2. patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured by the RAND-36 "General Health" domain.
ACE-AF will provide evidence to guide treatment decisions for very elderly patients with symptomatic AF and help identify which patients benefit most from an ablation-based strategy compared with optimized medical therapy.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥78 years.
ECG-documented atrial fibrillation.
AF type: paroxysmal, persistent, or longstanding persistent AF.
Suitable candidate for catheter ablation according to ESC guidelines.
Disqualifiers
Left atrial (LA) dimension >55 mm, based on echocardiography within the previous year.
Acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery bypass surgery within the last 12 weeks.
Severe valvular heart disease (per ESC definitions) or congenital heart disease.
Prior surgical or catheter AF ablation procedure, or prior AV-node (atrioventricular nodal) ablation.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Procedure/SurgeryCatheter ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) prioritized as the primary lesion set. Energy source and tools are selected according to local practice and operator discretion (no restriction to a specific technology), performed under routine standards of care at experienced centres.
Optimized Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation
DrugGuideline-directed rate and/or rhythm control tailored to the participant's clinical condition, including rate-control medications and/or antiarrhythmic drugs and cardioversion when clinically appropriate. AF ablation is not performed as part of this strategy.
Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR)
DeviceSubcutaneous implantable loop recorder used for continuous rhythm monitoring and quantification of atrial fibrillation burden throughout follow-up. Implanted in all participants according to protocol-defined workflow.
AV Node Ablation With Pacemaker implantation
Procedure/SurgeryAV node ablation with permanent pacing may be performed when clinically indicated according to routine care, as part of the optimized medical therapy strategy.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Composite clinical endpoint (all-cause mortality, stroke, serious bleeding, cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization)
First part of the co-primary outcome: Proportion of participants with ≥1 of the following events within 24 months after intervention (visit 2): all-cause death, stroke, serious bleeding, cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for heart failure. Events will be adjudicated per protocol.
Change in RAND-36 General Health score
Second part of the co-primary outcome: Change from baseline in the RAND-36 "General Health" domain score at 24 months after the intervention (visit 2). Scores range 0-100; higher scores indicate better perceived health. Intention-to-treat. Because HRQoL is undefined after death, scores are not imputed for participants who die before the 24-month assessment; instead, deceased participants are assigned the worst rank (worst-rank / composite estimand, ICH E9(R1)) and the primary comparison uses a rank-based test. Missing data other than death are handled under a missing-at-random assumption with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.
Secondary outcomes
Differences of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia burden (ILR-derived) between groups
Differences in percentage of time in atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ("AF/AT burden") measured by continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) between randomization groups.
Hospitalizations (all-cause and cardiovascular)
Number of hospital admissions, including cardiovascular/AF-related hospitalizations, collected from clinical records.
Serious adverse events and treatment-related complications
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and procedure-/treatment-related complications, including ablation-related and device-related complications, recorded and classified per protocol.
Additional patient-reported outcomes (AF symptoms / disease-specific HRQoL)
Symptom burden and AF-related quality of life assessed using validated questionnaires specified in the protocol (e.g., ASTA and/or AFEQT, as applicable).
Other outcomes
Discrimination of an inflammation proteomics-based prediction model for the ACE-AF primary composite outcome
A predefined subgroup of patients included in the County of Stockholm and Östergotland will be analyzed using a targeted inflammation proteomics panel. A prespecified inflammation proteomics score will be computed from the panel. The score combined with baseline clinical covariates will be used to develop a prediction model for time to first occurrence of the ACE-AF primary composite outcome event.
Correlation between change in Epicardial fat and the combined AF/AT burden
Correlation between CT-derived Epicardial fat volume around LA the combined AF/AT burden measured by ILR through follow-up.
Discrimination of a saliva proteomics-based prediction model for the primary composite outcome
In a predefined subgroup providing separate consent, saliva samples will be analyzed using a proteomics platform. A prespecified salivary proteomics score will be used to develop a prediction model for the first occurrence of the study primary composite outcome event from baseline.
Change from baseline in oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14 total score)
Patient-reported oral health-related quality of life measured using the Swedish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). The outcome will be reported as change from baseline in OHIP-14 total score.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Karolinska University Hospital
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Collaborator
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Collaborator
University Hospital, Umeå
Collaborator
Dept of Cardiology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
Collaborator
Lund University Hospital
Collaborator
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre
Collaborator
Uppsala University Hospital
Collaborator
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Collaborator