Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

The protocol is designed to enroll patients from at least 3 diverse clinical sites with smartphones who are being evaluated for the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) using the Heart Rhythm Software algorithm running on their smartphones. Algorithm output will be compared to a gold standard of 12-lead ECG recorded with a simultaneous PPG measurement.

Rationale: Effectiveness of thermal ablation techniques for pulmonary vein isolation, to treat atrial fibrillation (AF), are hampered by frequent pulmonary vein reconnection and risks of collateral tissue injury. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers a non-thermal, tissue-specific alternative that may provide more durable isolation while also reducing procedural risks. While early data for the CE-marked VARIPULSE™ PFA system are promising, long-term lesion durability remains mostly unquantified. To obtain a definitive estimate of PFA effectiveness, a systematic invasive re-mapping approach is required. Advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can quantify atrial fibrosis after PVI across different ablation modalities, but it is unknown how well these imaging findings correspond with invasive electrical mapping. In the current study, CMR serves as a complementary modality to explore whether imaging-based tissue changes align with invasively confirmed long-term isolation. Objective: The primary objective is to evaluate the long-term durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ Pro PFA system, as defined by the rate of electrical reconnection during systematic invasive re-mapping at three months. Study design: Prospective multicenter intervention study. Study population: Patients ≥ 18 years old, eligible for primary PVI according to ESC guidelines, without contraindications for gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced CMR imaging. Intervention: Patients will undergo PVI using PFA with the VARIPULSE™ catheter. After 3-4 months, a re-map procedure will be performed to assess lesion durability and to re-isolate any electrical reconnections. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome measure: Patient-level PV lesion durability. Secondary outcome measures: Percentage chronic isolation for each PV; Location of reconnection during re-map and lesion characteristics; Presence, location, size, volume and composition of acute (within 72 hours) and chronic (3 months) ablation lesions and collateral tissue damage on CMR (in the atrial wall and surrounding structure); Procedural fluoroscopy time and radiation dose; Percentage direct isolation for each pulmonary vein (PV); Acute PV reconnection for each PV; Percentage freedom from atrial achyarrhythmias at 12 months follow-up; Incidence of procedure related adverse events. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation involves standard PVI care with additional CMR imaging and an invasive re-map procedure. Early studies show that PFA with the VARIPULSE™ catheter is safe, and the extra imaging adds only minimal burden or risk. The re-map study carries the same risks as standard ablation. Overall, the study is expected to provide valuable insights that may further improve patient care and outcomes in atrial fibrillation.

The goal of this multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) stellate ganglion modulation for improving autonomic function and sleep quality in perioperative cardiovascular disease patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does LIFU improve heart rate variability and sleep characteristics from baseline at 3-7 days post-surgery compared to sham ultrasound? 2. Does LIFU improve serological markers, vital signs, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and reduce \>30-second perioperative arrhythmias? 3. What is the safety profile of LIFU in this population? 200 eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either active LIFU (2.0W, 1MHz, 50% duty cycle, 30min daily for 3-7 days) plus standard care, or identical sham ultrasound plus standard care. A four-party double-blind design (subjects, operators, assessors, analysts) will be implemented. The study will run from May 1, 2026 to April 1, 2027 at 6 centers in China. Participants will: 1. Complete pre-surgery screening and baseline assessments (PSQI, 12h ECG/sleep monitoring, residual blood sample collection) 2. Receive daily assigned ultrasound intervention for 3-7 consecutive days post-surgery 3. Undergo 72h continuous ECG monitoring post-surgery, and repeat assessments at 3-7 days 4. Have all adverse events and arrhythmias recorded throughout the study 5. May withdraw voluntarily at any time without affecting routine medical care

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation and pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.

This study is researching experimental drugs called REGN7508 and REGN9933. The study is focused on participants who have atrial fibrillation, which means that the heart beats too fast and unevenly. REGN7508 and REGN9933 are designed to help stop blood clots forming in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study is to see how well REGN7508 and REGN9933 work in patients that get medicine for their atrial fibrillation. The bleeding effects of REGN7508 and REGN9933 will be compared to another medicine (apixaban), which is available on the market to treat and prevent formation of blood clots. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * What side effects may happen from taking REGN7508 or REGN9933 * How well do the study drugs reduce the risk of having a stroke * How much of REGN7508 or REGN9933 is in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against REGN7508 or REGN9933 (which could make the drugs less effective or could lead to side effects)

The goals of this observational study are to collect data and ultrasound images using the Philips VeriSight Pro intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter to assess safety and effectiveness and to support development efforts of the VeriSight Pro imaging platform.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study evaluating the feasibility and safety of augmented reality-based remote technical support using the Microsoft HoloLens and EnSite™ Connected Care compared with conventional on-site support during 3D electroanatomical mapping-guided electrophysiological procedures. The study also assesses the feasibility of an AI-based algorithm integrated into the Medinbox Link system for automated procedural report generation and detection of protocol deviations from standard clinical practice.

This prospective multi-cohort observational study evaluates the association between peripheral blood lipidomic and ceramide profiles and atrial fibrillation. The study hypothesis is that peripheral blood lipidomic features and ceramide-related profiles are associated with the presence of atrial fibrillation. Participants with atrial fibrillation and control participants with other cardiovascular diseases will be prospectively enrolled. Peripheral blood samples will be analyzed using untargeted lipidomic profiling in one cohort and targeted ceramide assays in another cohort.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants(NOACs) are standard care for thromboembolism prevention in patients with Aterial Fibrillation(AF). However, evidence comparing edoxaban and apixaban remains limited in AF patients with coexisting coronary artery disease(CAD). This study aims to evaluate whether edoxaban-based therapy is non-interior to apixaban-based therapy with respect to Net Adverse Clinical Events(NACE) in AF patients with concomitant CAD.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder and is associated with symptoms, reduced quality of life, heart failure, stroke, and a high risk of recurrence after catheter ablation. Many patients scheduled for their first ablation are overweight or have obesity, which is one of the strongest predictors of AF recurrence. Weight loss and risk-factor management are known to improve the outcome of ablation, but lifestyle changes are often difficult to achieve in routine care. Semaglutide (Wegovy®) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved in the EU for weight management. It has been shown to produce substantial and sustained weight loss and to improve metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors. Whether treatment with semaglutide before AF ablation can improve long-term rhythm outcomes has never been tested in a randomized clinical trial. The WAIT-AF study is a randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint assessment. The study includes adults with AF who are scheduled for their first catheter ablation and have a BMI ≥30 kg/m², or ≥27 kg/m² with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor (such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia). A total of 200 participants will be enrolled. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either standard care or semaglutide (plus lifestyle advice) prior to their scheduled ablation. Semaglutide is administered according to the approved EU label with gradual dose escalation. All participants receive an implantable loop recorder (ILR) before ablation to continuously monitor heart rhythm throughout the study. The primary objective is to determine whether semaglutide improves arrhythmia-free survival 12 months after AF ablation. Recurrence is defined as AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds on continuous ILR monitoring, excluding the standard 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes include weight loss, changes in blood pressure, AF symptoms, quality of life, AF burden, need for repeat ablation, hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes, and changes in metabolic risk factors. The study also evaluates safety and tolerability of semaglutide in this patient population. The study aims to determine whether targeted weight management with semaglutide before AF ablation can improve long-term rhythm outcomes and overall cardiovascular health. If successful, this strategy may offer a new approach to optimizing treatment and improving the results of catheter ablation for patients with AF and overweight or obesity

The OPTION-EMEA post-market study is intended to gather real world clinical data for patients undergoing AF ablation with the FARAPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) System and subsequent left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with a WATCHMAN FLX™ Pro or WATCHMAN FLX device during one interventional case. The study will include patients that are clinically indicated for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the FARAPULSE PFA System and for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) treatment using a WATCHMAN FLX Pro or WATCHMAN FLX device as part of the patient's standard of care determined by their doctor's medical judgement.

This study investigates whether a smartphone application that measures heart rhythm using light, a technique known as photoplethysmography or PPG, can accurately detect when the cardiac arrhythmia atrial fibrillation (AF) spontaneously terminates and the heart returns to normal sinus rhythm. This is a prospective, multicentre randomised controlled study conducted at Hospital East Limburg and University Hospitals Leuven. Continuous heart rhythm monitoring with conventional equipment is often not feasible in the home setting because of the high cost and complexity of the equipment. Smartphone-based PPG monitoring offers a practical and affordable alternative. The study will include 200 adult patients with known AF who are scheduled for elective electrical cardioversion. Patient will be randomised to either standard of care (no remote monitoring) or smartphone-based PPG monitoring. During the seven days preceding the procedure, participants in the intervention group will perform PPG and ECG measurements at predefined times using their smartphone and a chest strap. The primary objective is to determine whether this intermittent, app-guided monitoring can detect spontaneous conversion to normal sinus rhythm before the planned cardioversion, thereby preventing unnecessary hospital admissions. In addition, we will evaluate the relationship between symptoms and cardiac rhythm, adherence to and user experience with self-monitoring, and the predictive value of the measured parameters for recurrence of AF or atrial flutter during one year of follow-up.

ACE-AF is a multicenter randomized study in people aged 78 years and older with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is a common heart rhythm disorder in older adults and can cause reduced quality of life and lead to serious complications such as stroke and heart failure. The study compares two established treatment strategies: 1. Catheter ablation (an invasive procedure aimed at reducing AF by electrically isolating triggers in the heart, primarily through pulmonary vein isolation), and 2. Optimized medical therapy without AF ablation (medications for rate and/or rhythm control; AV node ablation with pacemaker may be used if clinically indicated according to routine care). Participants are randomized 1:1 to one of these strategies. All participants will receive an implantable loop recorder (a small heart rhythm monitor placed under the skin) to continuously track heart rhythm and measure AF burden over time. The study has two primary endpoints, tested with Holm-Bonferroni multiplicity control assessed over 24 months: 1. a composite of major clinical events (all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, cardiac arrest, or hospitalization due to heart failure), and 2. patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured by the RAND-36 "General Health" domain. ACE-AF will provide evidence to guide treatment decisions for very elderly patients with symptomatic AF and help identify which patients benefit most from an ablation-based strategy compared with optimized medical therapy.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In atrial fibrillation, there is a risk that clots can form in the heart, especially in the left atrium. If these clots come loose, there is a risk of stroke. To prevent strokes, patients with atrial fibrillation and status post ICB can be treated with anticoagulants. This medication therapy prevents blood clots from forming in the heart, but can also cause bleeding. Another therapy option is the occlusion of the left atrium. After closure of the left atrium, only a short anticoagulation therapy is necessary until the occluder has healed. The aim of the study is to compare these two treatment approaches. In this study only already approved drugs and occlusion systems will be used.

This trial is a randomized study for patients with significant atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related hospitalizations, AF recurrence, and quality of life improvement is hypothesized to be superior with the combination of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and catheter ablation, compared with catheter ablation alone.

This is a prospective study validating a new machine-learning algorithm that detects atrial fibrillation (AF) from photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, developed for integration into the Seerlinq remote monitoring platform. This algorithm builds on the same core PPG signal-processing technology as Seerlinq's HeartCore device, a CE-certified (Class IIb, MDR) device that monitors left ventricular filling pressures in heart failure patients. The algorithm will be validated through internal cross-validation, external validation against an independent cohort with paired PPG-ECG recordings, and validation in a cohort of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and frequent sinus-AF transitions.

About one in three patients who undergo open-heart surgery develop an irregular heart rhythm called postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). This condition increases the risk of stroke, prolongs hospital stays, and raises the chances of complications and death compared with patients who do not develop it. Because of these serious outcomes, researchers are working to identify which patients are most at risk. One potential blood marker is lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a). Higher levels of Lp(a) have been linked to abnormal heart rhythms in previous studies. We want to determine whether patients with elevated Lp(a) are more likely to develop POAF after heart surgery and better understand the biological mechanisms behind this risk. In this study, patients will be grouped based on whether they have high or low Lp(a) levels. All participants will wear a chest band monitor that continuously tracks heart rhythm for 3 months after surgery to detect POAF. During surgery, small tissue samples from the heart will also be collected. By examining these samples, we will assess whether patients with elevated Lp(a) show more scarring and inflammation which are two pathways known to cause abnormal heart rhythms. The goal of this study is to determine whether elevated Lp(a) increases susceptibility to POAF. This could help identify patients who may benefit from preventive treatments and closer monitoring. By understanding how Lp(a) affects heart tissue, we also hope to uncover the mechanisms that contribute to abnormal rhythm and guide the development of future targeted therapies to treat POAF and other heart rhythms.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether intravenous verapamil or intravenous metoprolol controls heart rate more effectively in adult patients who arrive at the emergency department with atrial fibrillation and a fast heart rate (rapid ventricular response), but who are otherwise medically stable. Atrial fibrillation with a rapid heart rate is a common emergency, and doctors currently choose between these two standard medicines based on personal preference rather than strong local evidence, since there is limited research on this comparison in Pakistani patients. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does a higher proportion of patients reach a target heart rate of less than 110 beats per minute within 30 minutes with verapamil compared to metoprolol? Which medicine controls the heart rate faster, on average? Are there differences in side effects (such as low blood pressure, slow heart rate, or breathing problems) between the two medicines? Researchers will compare a group of patients receiving verapamil to a group receiving metoprolol to see if one medicine controls the heart rate faster and more safely than the other. Participants will: 1. Receive either verapamil or metoprolol through an IV, with the dose given according to standard protocols 2. Have their heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen levels monitored continuously for 30 minutes after the medicine is given 3. Be observed for any side effects during this monitoring period Both medicines used in this study are already standard, guideline-recommended treatments for this condition, so participation will not change or delay the medical care patients would normally receive.

Conquer-AF is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, non-randomized clinical study that will enroll up to 400 subjects at up to 30 sites across the United States, Europe, and Australia. Subjects diagnosed with symptomatic recurrent paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation after a single prior ablation procedure will be enrolled in this study. Each subject will undergo a study index redo ablation procedure using the Sphere-9 Catheter and Affera Ablation System and will be followed for 12 months. The expected total study duration (from time of first enrollment to the exit of last enrolled subject) is approximately 2 years.

The study will compare two ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing repeat ablation using pulsed-field ablation: redo pulmonary vein isolation only versus redo pulmonary vein isolation with added posterior wall ablation.

The CAFIB trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover clinical trial designed to determine whether habitual caffeine consumption in coffe adversely affects rate control in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). The rationale stems from the discrepancy between traditional clinical recommendations, which often advise patients with arrhythmias to avoid caffeine, and the growing body of evidence suggesting that moderate coffee consumption is not associated with an increased risk of AF and may even confer cardiovascular benefits. However, no randomized study has specifically investigated this issue in patients with permanent AF, a population in whom rate control remains the cornerstone of management. The primary hypothesis is that continued moderate caffeine consumption is non-inferior to caffeine abstinence regarding 24-hour mean heart rate control. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment sequences stratified according to baseline coffee intake (1 cup/day vs. \>1 cup/day). Owing to the nature of the intervention, the study is open-label; nevertheless, Holter recordings will be analyzed by blinded investigators, and the statistical analysis will also be performed blinded to treatment allocation to minimize bias. Eligible participants are adults with permanent AF diagnosed for more than three months, stable ventricular rate control (\<110 bpm at rest), unchanged rate-control medication for at least two months, and habitual coffee consumption of at least one caffeinated cup per day. Patients with advanced heart failure, recent major cardiovascular events, cognitive impairment, implanted cardiac pacing devices, or other conditions likely to interfere with study outcomes are excluded. The intervention compares two dietary strategies: continuation of regular caffeinated coffee consumption (at least one cup daily) versus complete caffeine abstinence, while allowing decaffeinated coffee. Energy drinks are prohibited in both groups, and participants assigned to abstinence are advised to avoid compensatory caffeine intake from other sources. No washout period is planned between crossover phases because caffeine has a biological half-life of less than 24 hours. Adherence will be assessed using caffeine consumption diaries and structured interviews at each study visit. The primary endpoint s the 24-hour mean heart rate measured by ambulatory Holter electrocardiography. Secondary endpoints include changes in mean HR from baseline, percentage of time with HR \>110 bpm or \<50 bpm, ventricular ectopic burden, symptom severity assessed using the modified EHRA classification, quality of life evaluated with the AFEQT questionnaire, circulating biomarkers of heart failure, adverse events, and changes in concomitant medical therapy. Patients will undergo three scheduled visits (baseline, 30 days, and 60 days), each including clinical assessment, ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, blood sampling, and quality-of-life questionnaires. Sample size calculation was based on detecting a clinically relevant difference of 5 bpm, assuming a standard deviation of 7 bpm, 80% statistical power, and a two-sided α of 0.05. After accounting for an anticipated 25% dropout rate and potential protocol deviations, a total of 50 patients (25 per treatment sequence) will be recruited. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, complemented by a per-protocol analysis. Statistical models will adjust for clinically relevant covariates, including age, sex, baseline heart rate, and concomitant rate-control therapy, while multivariable regression analyses will explore predictors of optimal heart rate control. The protocol acknowledges several limitations, including its open-label design, reliance on self-reported caffeine intake to assess adherence, interindividual variability in caffeine metabolism, and limited external validity to stable, habitual coffee consumers with permanent AF. Despite these limitations, CAFIB represents the first randomized trial specifically evaluating the impact of caffeine consumption on ventricular rate control in permanent AF.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among Veterans. Clinical trials are essential for developing better treatments, but Veterans remain underrepresented in these studies due to barriers including limited health literacy, lack of awareness, and mistrust. Current outreach approaches rely on either in-person physician conversations, which are limited by workforce constraints, or mailed letter invitations, which often fail to engage Veterans with limited health literacy. This study tests whether AI-generated video avatars can improve Veteran engagement in cardiovascular clinical trials.

This OLE part is an optional, single arm, multicenter, open-label extension (OLE) added to the core part to assess the long-term safety, tolerability, the incidence of ischemic stroke or SE and bleeding events of abelacimab in eligible patients who completed the double-blinded core part of CMAA868A2302 (ANT-010/NCT05712200)

This study aims to explore the feasibility of using medical large language models to assist in chronic disease management. By setting up experimental and control group interventions and having experts blindly evaluate anonymized cases, it compares different management approaches in chronic disease care, verifying the scientific basis, effectiveness, and potential for broader use of medical large language models in supporting chronic disease management.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and acute safety of the dual electrical cardioversion (ECV) technique compared with the conventional ECV in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The main question it aims to answer are: * Is dual ECV more effective than conventional ECV to achieve sinus rhythm restoration? * Is dual ECV safe compared with conventional ECV? * Which are the main factors associated with cardioversion success? Researchers will compare a dual ECV technique with 400J with dual ECV with 200J and conventional ECV. Participants will be randomized to one ECV configuration. The primary efficacy endpoint will be considered the percentage of patients with successful cardioversion with the first shock. The coprimary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of adverse events during ECV.