Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-60
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

For the purpose of the study, patients will be divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B. In Group (A), 14 immediate implants will be placed using traditional drilling technique, while in Group (B), 14 immediate implants will be placed using OD drilling technique Osseodensification is a system for implant osteotomy preparation, it compresses the cancellous bone around the revolving drills. It largely improves low bone volume by physically increasing the interlocking between the bone and the implant surface. The Densah burs enhances bone density while generating the least amount of heat.

Traditional oversized drilling is the regular manufacturer recommended technique of drilling. It functions by cutting the bone during osteotomy preparation by sharp fluted drills. The undersizing of the preparation allows the implant to partially compact the bone during insertion.

The objective of the current study is to compare between osseodensification drilling protocol versus traditional undersized drilling protocol in immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary region in terms of implant stability.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients in need of extraction of a single, unrestorable tooth in the esthetic zone including maxillary anteriors and premolars

Age range between 20-60 years old

An intact buccal plate of bone after extraction

Medically free patients (Brightman. 1994)

Disqualifiers

Acute infection in the implant site

Patients incapable of maintaining oral hygiene

Pregnant and nursing female patients

Smokers (more than 5 cigarettes per day)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional drilling

    Procedure/Surgery

    Atraumatic extraction, followed by sequential drilling using conventional drills

  • Osseodensification drilling

    Procedure/Surgery

    Atraumatic extraction, followed by osteotomy prepared using densah bur (sequential drilling)

Treatment groups

26 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Control: conventional drillingActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Intervention: OsseodensificationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Implant stability quotient (ISQ)

resonance frequency analysis

Time frame
1 week, 2 week, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

1

Crestal bone level

Parallel technique periapical radiography

Time frame
day of the surgery (baseline), at 3 and 6 months postoperatively)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.