Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Shade Matching Between Natural Teeth and Monolithic All-ceramic Crowns Fabricated From Two Materials

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-45
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

evaluation of color difference between zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (celtra press) VS lithium disilicate (Emax) in relation to natural tooth structure to determine which monolithic material will provide restoration with exact shade and optical properties as natural tooth structure.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

1. Age range of the patients from 20-45 years old; able to read and sign the informed consent document, illiterate patient will be avoided.

Disqualifiers

Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.

Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.

Pregnant women's to avoid any complication that may occur in dental office due to pregnancy or due to injected anesthetic solution.

Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Celtra Press

    Other intervention

    new class of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate material available to labs for pressing. This unique material provides top aesthetics and is virtually impossible to tell apart from a natural tooth. Celtra Press is a multiphase ceramic consisting of a glass matrix and lithium disilicate crystals having a crystal length of about 1.5 µm plus nano-scale lithium phosphate . In addition to Li2O and SiO2, Celtra Press contains about 10% zirconia (ZrO2), which is dissolved completely in the glass phase rather than in crystalline form. Celtra Press is characterized by a high strength of about 500 MPa and excellent flow properties during pressing.

Treatment groups

10 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: IPS e.max Press(lithium di silicate)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Celtra PressExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Color match

using USPHS scoring system

Time frame
immediately after crown cementation

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient satisfaction

Patient satisfaction using Visual Analogue scale- Binary (Satisfied or not satisfied)

Time frame
immediately after crown cementation

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: