Clinical Evaluation of Hybrid Ceramic Occlusal Veneers Bonded With Two Self Adhesive Resin Cements

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21+
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical performance of hybrid ceramic occlusal veneers cemented with two different bonding protocols: a self-adhesive bonding protocol with adhesive enhancement (BeautiLink SA cement with BeautiBond Xtreme adhesive) versus another self-adhesive bonding protocol (RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement with 3M UNIVERSAL bond).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Age ≥ 21 years

Vital teeth

Sufficient tooth structure for veneer retention

Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Disqualifiers

• Patients with active periodontal disease (probing depth > 4mm, bleeding on probing)

Patients with severe parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism confirmed by clinical examination)

Poor oral hygiene (plaque index > 30%)

Pregnancy or nursing

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • hybrid ceramic occlusal veneers

    Other intervention

    occlusal veneers cemented with self adhesive resin cements

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Hybrid ceramic occlusal veneers cemented with Rely X U200 cementActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Hybrid ceramic occlusal veneers cemented with BeautiLink SA cementExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Marginal discoloration

Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria Alpha: No discoloration on margin Bravo: Discoloration found at margin Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in a pulpal direction

Time frame
18 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Retention

Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria Alpha: retained Charlie: debonded

Time frame
18 months
2

Marginal adaptation

Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria Alpha: explorer does not catch or has one way catch when drawn across restoration/tooth interface Bravo: explorer falls into crevice when drawn across the restoration tooth interface Charlie: Dentin or base exposed along margin

Time frame
18 months
3

Postoperative hypersensitivity

Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria Alpha: Absent Charlie: Present

Time frame
18 months
4

Recurrent caries

Measuring device: Modified USPHS criteria Alpha: no evidence of caries at the margin of restoration Charlie: evidence of caries continuous with the margin of restoration

Time frame
18 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.