About this trial
the aim of this study is To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Self- Cure Bulk fill Composite Resin Versus Conventional Bulk fill resin composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions over a Period of 24 months Follow-up.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients consulting in one of the outpatient clinics listed above.
Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures.
Provide informed consent.
Accepts the 18 months follow-up period.
Disqualifiers
Medically compromised patients, as they will not be able to attend multiple appointments or may require special management.
Pregnant women; as radiographs cannot be taken for them.
Allergy to any of the restorative materials, including anesthetics.
Uncooperative patients, will not abide by the instructions or attend the appointments.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
class II restoration
Procedure/SurgeryA class II cavity will be prepared after local anesthesia has been given as requierd . Rubber dam isolation will be done. Sectional matricing and wedging will be done. Followed by placement of restorative material according to the randomization sequence.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Marginal adaptation
The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for acceptable and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.
Secondary outcomes
Marginal discoloration
The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for acceptable and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.
Recurrent caries
The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.
Retention analysis
The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.
Surface roughness
The restoration will be clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restoration will be given Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for acceptable and charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need of replacement.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: