Closed-Loop Neurofeedback Targeting the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Cardiac Autonomic Modulation in Coronary Artery Disease With Anxiety

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorShenyang Medical College

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether real-time fNIRS-BCI neurofeedback targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC), using active volitional control during a slow-wave auditory acoustic paradigm, can suppress cardiac sympathetic activity and improve autonomic regulation in right-handed patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) and comorbid DSM-5 anxiety.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does real neurofeedback, compared with sham, reduce baseline-corrected heart rate during the auditory stimulation window? Does real neurofeedback, compared with sham, increase HRV spectral power around 0.0167 Hz (1/60 Hz) and produce stronger suppression of right DLPFC activation? Does suppression of right DLPFC activation mediate the effect of group assignment on heart rate?

If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the real neurofeedback group with the sham (non-contingent) feedback group, which uses identical audio and interface, to determine whether coupling feedback to right DLPFC activity yields autonomic benefits.

Participants will:

Complete eligibility screening in cardiology and psychiatry and provide informed consent; baseline demographics, medical history, vital signs, and medications are recorded (HAMA/HAMD used for eligibility only).

Undergo a 3-day adaptation phase to practice active volitional self-regulation while viewing a real-time energy bar mapped to right DLPFC statistics; adaptation data are not analyzed for outcomes.

Attend two formal sessions (Days 4-5), each with 15 blocks of 60 s (20 s rest + 40 s stimulus). The auditory stimulus is a 1 Hz amplitude-modulated pure tone at approximately 60 dB; 10-second white-noise bursts are randomly embedded within the 40-second window. During the stimulation period, participants receive real or sham feedback on right DLPFC activation and act to push the energy bar below an unlabeled threshold line using active volitional strategies.

Undergo synchronous fNIRS (HbO) and 3-lead ECG (1,000 Hz) recording throughout; online processing and rendering performance metrics are logged; adverse events are monitored and managed per protocol.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >18 years, any sex.

Right-handed, with resting heart rate between 60 and 100 beats per minute.

Diagnosis of an anxiety disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5).

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score ≥16 and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score ≤17.

Disqualifiers

Acute unstable angina.

Severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV).

Valvular heart disease.

History of atrial fibrillation.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Real-time fNIRS-ECG neurofeedback

    Device

    This intervention uses real-time neurofeedback based on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC) activity measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), with simultaneous ECG recording. During a slow-wave auditory paradigm (1 Hz amplitude-modulated tone with embedded white noise), participants attempt to downregulate right DLPFC activation via active volitional strategies, guided by a visual energy bar. Before formal intervention, a 3-day adaptation phase familiarises participants with the interface and task, under guidance. The formal training occurs on Days 4-5 (15 blocks/day), using identical auditory input and recording protocol. Participants are randomised to real or sham feedback groups, differing only in the statistical threshold used to generate feedback (T = -3.3 vs T = -1.0). Participants and assessors are blinded to allocation.

Treatment groups

56 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Real Neurofeedback GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham Neurofeedback GroupSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The between-group difference (real neurofeedback vs sham) in baseline-corrected heart rate (HR) during the task stimulation window.

Time frame
The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).

Secondary outcomes

1

Between-group difference in task-related activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (right DLPFC).

Quantified as the GLM task regressor β (HbO) during the slow-wave auditory neurofeedback paradigm

Time frame
The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).
2

Between-group difference in HRV spectral power at 0.0167 Hz during the task stimulation window, based on wavelet time-frequency analysis.

Time frame
The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).

Other outcomes

1

Mediation analysis: to assess the indirect effect of group assignment on baseline-corrected HR via changes in right DLPFC activation.

Time frame
The formal experimental phase (day 4 and 5).
2

Incidence of any adverse events during training or stimulation (e.g., mild dizziness or drowsiness, transient bradycardia or blood pressure-related discomfort, headache, or nausea).

Time frame
From the adaptation phase until completion of the formal experimental sessions (Days 1-5).

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Shenyang Medical College

Lead sponsor

The Second Hospital of Shenyang Medical College

Collaborator