Anxiety Disorders

Study Description: This study examines relations between neurocognitive and clinical features of pediatric anxiety disorders. The study uses neuro-cognitive tasks, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), as well as magneto- and electro-encephalography (M/EEG). Patients will be studied over one year, before and after receiving either one of two standard-of-care treatments: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Healthy comparisons will be studied at comparable time points. Primary Objectives: To compare healthy youth and symptomatic, medication-free pediatric patients studied prior to receipt of treatment. The study seeks to detect relations between clinical features of anxiety disorders at baseline and a wide range of neurocognitive features associated with attention, memory, and response to motivational stimuli. Secondary Objectives: 1. To document relations between baseline neurocognitive features and response to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or fluoxetine, as defined by the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) and Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) Scale. 2. To document relations between post-treatment changes in neurocognitive features and anxiety symptoms on the PARS following treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or fluoxetine. 3. To document relations among broad arrays of clinical, cognitive, and neural measures Primary Endpoints: Indices of percent-signal change in hypothesized brain regions, comprising amygdala, striatum, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) for each fMRI and MEG paradigm. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Treatment-response as defined by a continuous measure, the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale score (PARS), and a categorial measure, the Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) score. 2. Levels of symptoms and behaviors evoked by tasks that engage attention, memory, and elicit responses to motivational stimuli.

Background: Anxiety disorders are becoming more common among children and teenagers. Anxiety can lead to long-term physical and mental problems, such as depression. Treatments for anxiety disorders include medications as well as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); CBT is a form of talking therapy. Both approaches work in only about 50 percent of cases. A new approach, called gaze-contingent music reward therapy (GCMRT), may help. Objective: To find out whether GCMRT combined with CBT is more effective than CBT alone. Eligibility: Children aged 8 to 17 years with separation anxiety disorder; generalized anxiety disorder; or social anxiety disorder. They must be enrolled in protocol 01-M-0192. Design: Participants will come to the clinic once a week for 4 weeks for CBT. Sometimes the participant will meet with the doctor alone; sometimes their parent may be present. They will do some computer-based tasks: They may be asked to push a button when a target appears; they may look at pictures of faces while the computer tracks their eye movements. Participants will take questionnaires each week. They will answer questions about their anxiety symptoms, feelings, and behavior. For the next 8 weeks, participants will participate in both CBT and 1 of 2 types of GCMRT. GCMRT is a computer-based task. Participants will look at pictures with many faces in them; while they do this, pleasant music will play and stop playing over a 12-minute period. Participants will have a final visit in week 13. They will take questionnaires. They will do final research tasks. Each visit lasts about 2 hours.

The purpose of this protocol is to allow for the careful screening of patients and healthy volunteers for participation in research protocols in the Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Lab (ETPB) at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and for the collection of natural history data. In addition the protocol will allow clinicians to gain more experience in the use of a variety of polysomnographic and high-density EEG recordings. Subjects in this protocol will undergo an evaluation which may include: a psychiatric interview; a diagnostic interview; rating scales; a medical history; a physical exam; brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); electroencephalography (EEG); electrocardiography (EKG), magnetoencephalography (MEG); blood, saliva and urine laboratory evaluation; and a request for medical records. Subjects may also be asked to complete questionnaires about attitudes towards research and motivation for research participation. The data collected may also be linked with data from other mood and anxiety disorder protocols (e.g., brain imaging, DNA, psychophysiology tests, treatment studies, etc) for the purposes of better understanding the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment response of patients with mood disorders. Parents of minors will be interviewed. Upon conclusion of the screening process, subjects will either be offered participation in a research protocol and will sign the appropriate informed consent, or will be considered not appropriate for participation in research and will be referred back into the community. The current protocol thus serves as an entry point for individuals with mood or anxiety disorders or healthy volunteers to enter NIMH IRB approved ETPB protocols.

The goal of this project is to critically evaluate the effectiveness of an online health program designed to improve diet and self-care in patients with rheumatological conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjogren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), anxiety disorders, depressive disorders and moderate depression. Additionally, investigators will assess the program's effectiveness, as well as the challenges and facilitators involved in using an online wellness program to reduce fatigue and enhance the quality of life in patients suffering from these conditions.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Autistic Youth (CBT-DAY) can improve depressive symptoms and related mechanisms in autistic youth aged 11-17 years with depression receiving care in outpatient clinical settings. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does CBT-DAY lead to greater reductions in depressive symptom severity compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU)? * Does CBT-DAY improve key mechanisms (emotional reactivity, self-esteem, and autism self-knowledge) associated with depression outcomes? Researchers will compare CBT-DAY versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) to see if CBT-DAY results in greater improvements in depressive symptoms and related outcomes. Participants will: * Complete baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up assessments (surveys and interviews) * Be randomly assigned to receive either 12 weeks of CBT-DAY or treatment-as-usual * Participate in therapy sessions during the 12-week intervention period * Complete follow-up assessments three months after treatment to evaluate longer-term outcomes

This clinical trial evaluates whether an optimized exposure-based treatment improves long-term outcomes for adults with anxiety disorders. Specifically, it examines whether Expectancy Focused Exposure (EFE), based on the inhibitory learning model, is more effective than Anxiety Focused Exposure (AFE) in reducing anxiety symptoms and preventing the return of fear over time. The study includes adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, including social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and can significantly interfere with daily functioning, work performance, and interpersonal relationships. Exposure therapy is a central component of cognitive behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders. Traditional exposure approaches often focus on reducing anxiety during exposure sessions, but many individuals experience a return of fear after treatment. New theoretical models suggest that exposure may be more effective when designed to violate threat expectations and strengthen inhibitory learning. Participants will be recruited in sequential cohorts and randomly assigned to immediate treatment or a brief waitlist before treatment begins. Those assigned to the waitlist will start treatment at the next study step. When treatment begins, participants will receive either EFE or AFE. Both treatments consist of approximately 10 weekly individual psychotherapy sessions delivered by trained therapists. Participants will complete clinical assessments before treatment, during treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment completion. In AFE, exposure exercises are organized along an anxiety hierarchy and focus on reducing anxiety responses through repeated confrontation with feared stimuli. In EFE, exposure focuses on identifying and testing threat expectations, and exercises are designed to maximize expectancy violation and strengthen inhibitory learning. Potential risks include temporary emotional discomfort during exposure exercises. All sessions will be conducted by trained clinicians who monitor participant safety throughout the study. The results may help improve exposure-based treatments for anxiety disorders by identifying strategies that enhance long-term outcomes and reduce relapse.

Identifying predictors and understanding mechanisms of change will inform referral to psychotherapy, triage and right-siting by helping clinicians to understand how their patients are likely to benefit from clinical interventions. This study will be the first of its kind conducted in an Asian hospital setting to identify the predictors of response to individual, group and internet-delivered CBT for the treatment of depressed and anxious patients in the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), Singapore. With increasing challenges with hospital workload, there is an increasing emphasis on group and online interventions. Understanding of the factors that may predict outcome from these therapies can improve right-siting by identifying who will get better without therapy or who may not benefit from a given form of therapy and guide personalisation of care. An important biological predictor of outcome is likely to be genetic risk as it has been demonstrated that patients with greater melancholia and a family history may not be sufficiently treated with brief courses of therapy. Identifying psychological factors underlying psychological distress and determining the extent to which these factors are addressed by these interventions will help to improve and individualise existing psychotherapy and motivate new psychotherapeutic interventions.

The study will compare 8-week Mindful Self-Compassion training, compared to a control group that does not receive the intervention, on anxiety and depression symptom severity in patients with diagnosed anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder) or major depressive disorder.

There are currently no approved medications for the treatment of anxiety in children and youth with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), both common and rare. Sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has extensive evidence to support its use in children's and youth with anxiety but not within NDDs. More research is needed to confirm whether or not sertraline could help improve anxiety in children and youth with common and rare neurodevelopmental conditions. This is a pilot study, in which we plan to estimate the effect size of reduction in anxiety of sertraline vs. placebo. across rare and common neurodevelopmental disorders, and determine the best measure(s) to be used as a primary transdiagnostic outcome measure of anxiety, as well as diagnosis specific measures in future, larger-scale clinical trials of anxiety in NDDs.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding patients' goals and concerns to measurement-based collaborative care can tailor care and provide a more holistic view of treatment, thereby improving engagement in care among adult patients receiving collaborative care. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does using a clinical decision support system (which includes an enhanced pre-visit questionnaire and patient-level dashboard) improve patient engagement in the collaborative care model? * Does using a clinical decision support system improve patient and clinician satisfaction with care? Researchers will compare the enhanced collaborative care with traditional collaborative care. Patient participants will complete pre-visit questionnaires before their collaborative care appointments. Responses will be viewed by the clinician and/or patient in a visual dashboard inside the electronic health record.

Why is this study being conducted? For people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, surgery, to remove the part of the brain where seizures start, is currently the most effective treatment. In many people, especially those with temporal lobe epilepsy, surgery can stop seizures completely and improve quality of life. However, doctors usually predict the chances of surgical success using brain scans and other neurological tests, while the possible influence of psychological and social factors remains less well understood. Mental health is an important part of overall health. People living with epilepsy are more likely than the general population to experience anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD can develop after experiencing traumatic events and may affect emotional well-being, daily activities, relationships, and physical health. Some studies suggest that PTSD may affect brain networks involved in epilepsy. This raises an important question: could PTSD influence the success of epilepsy surgery? We hypothesize that PTSD and other psychological or social factors may affect surgical outcomes and recovery after surgery. At present, there is limited evidence available to answer this question. What is the aim of the study? The main objective of this study is to determine whether PTSD affects the success of epilepsy surgery two years after the operation. The study also aims to: * Describe the medical, psychological, and social characteristics of people undergoing epilepsy surgery and estimate how common traumatic experiences and PTSD are in this population; * Assess changes in PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, quality of life, social vulnerability, and patient satisfaction before and after surgery; * Identify biological, psychological, and social factors associated with successful surgical outcomes. Rather than focusing only on seizure control, this study aims to improve understanding of the factors that contribute to recovery, quality of life, and long-term well-being after epilepsy surgery. The findings may help healthcare professionals provide more personalized support before and after surgery. Who can take part? Between September 2026 and September 2028, the study will recruit 42 adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who are being evaluated for resective epilepsy surgery at Timone University Hospital in Marseille, France. What does participation involve? Participants will join the study approximately three months before surgery and will be followed for two years after the operation. During routine pre-operative and post-operative follow-up visits, participants will complete validated self-report questionnaires about: * Traumatic experiences and PTSD symptoms; * Anxiety and depression; * Quality of life; * Social vulnerability; * Satisfaction with surgery. Participants whose questionnaire results suggest possible PTSD will be offered a routine psychiatric assessment to confirm the diagnosis. Based on these assessments, participants will be classified into one of two groups: people with PTSD and people without PTSD. The study will also use clinical information routinely collected as part of epilepsy care, including brain imaging, electroencephalography (EEG), and neuropsychological assessments. What are the expected benefits of this research? This study may improve understanding of how psychological and social factors influence epilepsy surgery outcomes. The results may help healthcare professionals better identify patients who could benefit from additional support before and after surgery. In the future, the findings could contribute to the development of more personalized care pathways, including advanced practice nursing follow-up, improved mental health screening, and targeted support to enhance seizure outcomes, quality of life, emotional well-being, and patient satisfaction after epilepsy surgery

This study is intended to help develop new MRI imaging techniques for studying mood and anxiety disorders. Researchers believe that depression and anxiety disorders may cause structural and functional changes in the brain. This study will optimize the way MRI scans are collected to look at brain structure and examine how the brain behaves while subjects perform particular tasks. Healthy volunteers and individuals with major depressive disorder may be eligible for this study. Participants undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological testing. : Individuals will be asked to participate in an MRI study on one of several scanners. The scanner used will measure blood flow in the brain, concentrations of certain chemicals in the brain, or magnetic properties of the brain. The scan may involve They watching a screen presenting images or doing a task in which they respond to pictures or sounds. Participants may be asked to return for additional scans. The study also involves neuropsychological tests, which assess cognitive performance. Often, people with mood disorders have subtle changes in performance on these tests that allow researchers to pinpoint where brain abnormalities occur. Before the tests can be used in patients, they must be validated by using healthy subjects. These tests are presented either orally, in written form, or on a computer.

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of MyFILM as a weekly group intervention for children aged 9-12 in a clinical setting. We will also gather preliminary data to explore changes in clinical metrics following participation in MyFILM in preparation for a full-scale clinical trial. Primary Objective (Feasibility): To determine whether a substantial proportion of participants complete the MyFILM intervention. Primary Objective (Acceptability): To determine whether the MyFILM intervention is acceptable to 9-12-year-old participants in a clinical setting. Secondary Objective (Clinical Effectiveness): To determine whether participation in MyFILM show preliminary evidence of improvement in social-emotional skills, coping ability, and reduction in anxiety and depression symptoms. Participants will: Participate in 9 sessions of a structured group-based program.

This study is testing a digital tool called BraveBot for young people who are receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety, OCD, or related problems. BraveBot is a computer program, not a person. It talks with youth through their phone or computer while they do "face-your-fears"-style exposure therapy homework that their therapist has assigned. Sometimes an exposure is done with BraveBot's real-time coaching, and sometimes on their own; after each exposure, youth answer a few short questions about how it went. Rather than dividing participants into separate groups, the study randomizes each individual exposure homework assignment. Every time a young person opens an eligible exposure, the system makes a 1:1 random assignment deciding whether that exposure is completed with BraveBot's support or independently (self-guided). The main goal is to learn whether using BraveBot helps youth understand their exposure assignments better, put in more effort, stick with exposures when they are hard, feel more capable, and find exposures more helpful in "fighting back" against anxiety. The study also examines whether BraveBot increases the likelihood that assigned exposures are completed, and explores effects on anxiety symptoms and how safe, easy to use, and useful BraveBot feels for youth, their therapists, and parents. BraveBot does not replace the therapist, diagnose, or design exposures; it only supports the homework the clinician has assigned, and is used under clinician oversight. A built-in safety system can detect possible risk-related language, pause the session, show crisis resources (such as 988), and notify the treating clinician. The study is conducted within routine outpatient psychology clinics at Mass General Brigham. Up to 40 youth ages 12-22 will take part.

This study aims to examine the scientific mechanisms of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH), a novel, rapidly acting, single session antidepressant and anxiolytic therapy. It also aims to determine its feasibility and acceptability in women with postpartum depression (PPD). The study will enroll four cohorts of participants: healthy postpartum controls; postpartum women with PPD; healthy adult controls; and adults with major depressive disorder or anxiety disorders in a longitudinal protocol.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with high rates of psychiatric comorbidity, particularly anxiety and depressive disorders, which contribute to significant impairment for affected youth and their families. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is recommended as a first-line treatment for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions specifically adapted for youth with ASD and co-occurring emotional disorders. The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP-C/UP-A) is a CBT-based intervention targeting shared mechanisms underlying anxiety and depression. A parent-mediated adaptation, the Unified Protocol-Adolescent Autism Parent Group (UP-A-AST), has been developed to address the specific needs of adolescents with ASD and co-occurring anxiety and/or depressive disorders. Preliminary quality improvement work has shown promising results. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the UP-A-AST Parent Group in a child and adolescent outpatient psychiatric setting. The study will include parents of adolescents aged 12-17 years with ASD and co-occurring anxiety and/or depressive disorders. Outcomes include changes in adolescents' psychiatric symptoms and functional impairment, as well as parents' perceived parenting competence. Additionally, parents' experiences of participating in the intervention will be explored.

This research study aims to develop a brief group-based treatment called Resilience Training for Teens, then to test how well it protects high school students with mild symptoms of depression, anxiety, or having unusual feelings from developing mental illnesses.

Growing up in a lower-income family robustly predicts worse mental health in adolescence and early adulthood. How does variability in family income "get under the skin" of the developing child and via what mechanisms does it increase risk for mental illness? Moreover, could supplements to family income at critical developmental periods help to prevent later youth mental illness? To address these questions, we leverage an innovative existing double blind randomized controlled trial of 3-years of substantial income supplements to parents. By experimentally studying the impacts of these income supplements on families and subsequent youth development, we can examine causal pathways from family income to risk for mental illness via family stress and neuroimmune mechanisms in ways never done before. Moreover, by measuring the longer-term impact of 3 years of income supplements to parents on their child's neuroimmune signaling and risk for mental illness, we can examine the policy implications for child development of unconditional cash transfers to parents and identify how and for whom these supplements help. We will test these basic and translational questions in a sample of 1,200 youth with lower-income parents randomly assigned to receive either a substantial monthly income supplement or a minimal monthly supplement for 3 years, starting when youth were between age 5 - 14 years old. We will follow up with youth and their parent 1 - 2 and 3 - 4 years after the intervention and examine whether income supplements predict better youth mental health during adolescence, as well as whether factors like child age and neighborhood quality modulate intervention effects. Additionally, we explore family stress mechanisms through which the intervention may impact child mental health. Finally, we will measure peripheral inflammation (inflammatory biomarkers and classical monocytes) and use MRI to assess threat, reward, and regulatory neural activity and connectivity among 500 of these youth. Our central hypothesis is that income supplements will decrease family and youth stress and improve parenting, which will improve neuroimmune signaling and decrease risk for psychopathology. Moreover, these effects will remain years after termination of the transfers and be strongest among families who received the intervention earlier in the child's life. This research will provide timely, relevant public health knowledge that will help policy makers understand the longer-term brain, immune, and mental health impacts of cash transfers to parents, while also advancing the science of the sociocontextual and neuroimmune pathways through which variability in family income impacts risk for psychopathology.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a universal intervention based on Natural Psychotherapy in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms among primary and middle school students. To evaluate both the clinical outcomes and the potential underlying mechanisms of change, data will be collected at four distinct time points: baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.

It is envisioned that multipronged benefits from this pilot work for the UPMC ISD and its members. It is expected the RxWell platform to provide the following benefits: expansion of the use of RxWell to all UPMC ISD members providing peri-operative mood management with advantage of improved peri-operative outcomes, improving saving for the UPMC ISD by hastening the recovery and decreased resource utilization, and addition to the high-value care of UPMC with this holistic approach to patient perioperative care

A 24-week, patient- and rater-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group controlled, and multi-centre randomized clinical trial (RCT) to establish the benefits of pharmacogenetics-informed pharmacotherapy versus dosing as usual (DAU) in psychiatric patients suffering from mood, anxiety, or psychotic disorders.

The purpose of this study is to identify pharmacogenetic profiles associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)-induced behavioral disinhibition in children with Major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders and/or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that could be used clinically to reduce the incidence of this adverse event and improve health outcomes.

This is a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of Resilience Training in college students with elevated transdiagnostic risk for developing a serious mental illness.

This study aims to learn more about avoidance behavior in people with anxiety, using mathematical models of decision-making processes and decoded neural signals of threat imminence. Researchers are investigating anxiety-related behavior and brain function in people with and without anxiety. Investigators are also looking at how behavior and brain function during tasks in the lab relate to avoidance in their daily lives. The investigators will also test whether changing how people avoid things in a behavioral task affects how people avoid things in their everyday life.

The study will compare the delivery of an 8-week Mindful Self-Compassion training, in-person against video-conference, on anxiety and depression symptom severity in patients with diagnosed anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder) or major depressive disorder or dysthymia.