Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability & Clinical Applications Consortium (CNTRACS): Study 1

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-59
SponsorWashington University School of Medicine

About this trial

In Study 1, investigators will test the ability of each of the seven paradigms to differentiate between schizophrenia (SZ)/schizoaffective disorder (SZA) and matched healthy control subjects (HC) and to predict individual differences in clinical measures of hallucinations and delusions (as well as measures of function). Investigators will also directly compare the tasks in terms of predictive ability and psychometric properties and determine whether the tasks share variance or explain unique variance. This will include determining whether hallucinations and delusions are best explained by separate underlying processes or by a single process. Investigators will also test whether the model-based parameters from these studies are more precise and sensitive than standard behavioral methods for assessing deficits across psychotic disorders and for predicting hallucinations and delusions (Aim 1). Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) \[HC, N=125\]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder \[SZ/SZA, N=200\]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a \~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups. Investigators will also validate key model-based parameters against well-characterized neurophysiological measures using electroencephalogram (EEG) (Aim 4). The data from Study 1 will also be used to optimize (e.g., length, floor, and ceiling effects) tasks for Study 2. To generate a sample with sufficient variation in hallucinations and delusions, investigators will recruit the following groups that balance feasibility with clinical relevance: A) healthy controls (HC) \[HC, N=125\]; B) schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder \[SZ/SZA, N=200\]). For Study 1, investigators will ensure that 40 patients are unmedicated. Investigators anticipate a \~20% screen fail/drop-out rate based on our prior Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium (CNTRACS) studies. Thus, investigators will run an additional 40 SZ/SZA and 15 HC. All sites have experience recruiting patients in each of these groups as indicated by our past successful studies, and the fact that investigators have been able to recruit patients with significant hallucinations and delusions in all groups.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

age 18 to 59

no substance disorder in past six months (confirmed with urine drug screens and breathalyzers);

no clinically significant head injury or neurological disease. 4. Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) score =16+.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective;

Disqualifiers

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder diagnosis

Family history of psychosis or bipolar

not in acute exacerbation requiring immediate hospitalization or treatment

self-reported medication non-compliance for at least the four previous weeks 3)never having started medications

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Motion Perception Task

    Behavioral

    Assesses updating of beliefs from new sensory inputs with prior knowledge via perceiving direction changes in random dot motion stimuli

  • Sine Wave Speech Task

    Behavioral

    Measures the degree to which overweighting of prior beliefs impacts processing of sensory inputs (detection of speech).

  • Volatility Task

    Behavioral

    Measures the updating of priors about the location of a bag drop from a helicopter when the location changes (prediction errors).

  • Choice Probabilistic Reversal Task

    Behavioral

    Assesses prior belief updating when feedback about obtaining positive outcomes changes (prediction errors).

  • Kamin Blocking Task

    Behavioral

    Examines the role of mismatches between learned priors and new information (prediction errors) in belief formation about event causes.

  • Minnesota Trust Game

    Behavioral

    Assesses the degree to which people distinguish between their priors about others' motivations, such as selfishness and spite, and impersonal chance in one-shot trust game and dictator games.

  • Dynamic Trust Game

    Behavioral

    Assesses degree to which people learn and update priors about trusting partners from dynamic social feedback (prediction error) in a social exchange game.

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Motion Perception Task Performance

With 15 degrees of initial or changed direction vs. the probability of failing to update.

Time frame
1 hour
2

Sine Wave Speech Task Performance

Percentage of trials coded as speech or not vs Dprime

Time frame
1 hour
3

Volatility Task Performance

Percent correct bag captures during periods of stability vs. instability - patients worse in both, but particularly impaired in instability vs. Environmental volatility belief parameter

Time frame
1 hour
4

Choice Probabilistic Reversal Performance Task

in-switch rate - higher in patients, particularly paranoid patients vs. prior on volatility belief updating in response to volatility

Time frame
1 hour

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Washington University School of Medicine

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Collaborator

University of Minnesota

Collaborator

University of Chicago

Collaborator

University of California, Irvine

Collaborator

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Collaborator