Cognitive Remediation in Forensic Mental Health Care

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-55
SponsorThe Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre

About this trial

Forensic patients often display cognitive deficits, particularly in the domain of executive functions, that represent a challenge to forensic rehabilitation.

One empirically-validated method to train executive functions is cognitive remediation, which consists of cognitive exercises combined with coaching.

This trial investigates whether cognitive remediation can improve cognitive, functional, and clinical outcomes in forensic inpatients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Cognitive Remediation

    Behavioral

    Cognitive Remediation consists of exercises, preferably supported by coaching, aimed at engaging cognitive skills and, as a result, at improving cognition as well as functional and clinical outcomes.

  • Active Control

    Behavioral

    Active control condition for cognitive remediation, matched in terms of session modality, number, duration, frequency, and format.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Cognitive RemediationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Active controlActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Executive Function

We will measure executive functions using tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB; Sandberg, 2011).

Time frame
within 1 week prior and 1 week after training, as well as at a 12-week follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

1

Oppositional Behavior

We will measure oppositional behavior using case-manager reports over the 12 weeks preceding and following the study. We will code frequency and severity of behavioral incidents (e.g., verbal and physical aggression) and compliance with rehabilitative interventions.

Time frame
within 12 weeks before and 12 weeks after training.
2

Functional Capacity

We will measure perceived functioning in daily life using the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; Schwarzer \& Jerusalem, 1995), scored on a scale of 10 to 40, with higher values indicating higher perceived general self-efficacy.

Time frame
within 1 week prior and 1 week after training, as well as at a 12-week follow-up.
3

Mental Health Symptoms

We will measure mental health symptoms using the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM; Evans et al., 2000), scored on a scale of 0 to 136, with greater scores indicating greater psychological distress.

Time frame
within 1 week before and 1 week after training, as well as at a 12-week follow-up.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.