Comparative 3-dimensional Superimposition Analysis of Dentition in Horizontal and Vertical Grower During the Retention Phase -A Prospective Clinical Trial''

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorPostgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

About this trial

This study aims to investigate the relationship between facial type and relapse of dentition post-orthodontically during the retention phase. According to the retention theorem "teeth which have been moved through orthodontic treatment tend to naturally return to their original position. It is hypothesized that significant differences will exist in tooth movement patterns between horizontal and vertical growers, with horizontal growers exhibiting more pronounced tooth movement in the vertical plane particularly in the overbite as compared to the vertical growers . Furthermore, it is expected that facial type will influence the stability of orthodontic treatment outcomes, with long-faced individuals showing more relapse of mandibular incisor alignment and crowding. By exploring this relationship, this study aims to provide valuable insights into the factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes and stability. With long-faced individuals exhibiting more mandibular backward rotation and short-faced individuals showing forward rotation, which increases the risk of deep bite . Additionally, understanding these factors is crucial for orthodontists to predict and prevent potential relapse, ensuring optimal treatment results and long-term stability. Hence, the present trial will be undertaken to assess the changes and compare If there is any difference in tooth movement in 3-Dimensional superimposition in the dentition in horizontal and vertical growers post orthodontically over a period of retention phase.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Fixed orthodontic cases with FMA of 26 0 or more for hyperdivergent cases and FMA Of 24 o or less for hypodivergent cases.

Optimal functional occlusion at end of treatment (PAR score >70%).

Littles irregularity index (Pre-treatment <6mm in both upper and lower arch).

Nonsurgical and non-orthopedic patients and non syndromic patients.

Disqualifiers

Subjects with incomplete orthodontic treatment.

TMJ disorder patients.

Any systemic disease affecting bone and general growth.

Patients with incomplete records

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 3 planes of space

    Other intervention

    To evaluate and compare the changes in dentition in 3 planes of space • Antero-posterior plane (Y-axis) • Vertical plane (Z-axis) • Transverse plane (X-axis)

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: vertical growerOther 1 intervention
Group B: Horizontal growerOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To compare 3 dimensional dentitional changes in dentition in 3 planes of space

To compare 3 dimensional dentitional changes in dentition in 3 planes of space using superimposition software • Antero-posterior plane (Y-axis) • Vertical plane (Z-axis) • Transverse plane (X-axis) at, T0(at the time of retainer delivery), T1(1 month of retainer delivery), T2(3 months of retainer delivery) and T3 (6 months of retainer delivery) ,T4 (12 months of retainer delivery) time interval.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.