Comparing Between Mulligan Technique and Active Release Technique in Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-40
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

This study will be conducted to compare between Mulligan mobilization technique and Active release technique in management of non-specific chronic neck pain as regard to neck pain, cervical range of motion and neck function.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Inclusion Criteria

Have referred from orthopedic surgeon diagnosed with NSCNP that has been localized to the cervical and periscapular areas for at least three months

Aged from 18-40 years

Having a score more than 10 on the Neck disability index (NDI)

Disqualifiers

History of previous neck surgery.

Recent or old fractures.

Cognitive impairment and inability to understand the scale.

Systematic inflammatory disease e.g., rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, neck pain with radiculopathy or neuropathy.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional treatment

    Other intervention

    twelve participants will receive only the conventional physical therapy program prescribed for chronic non-specific neck pain in the form of: 1.Source of superficial heat using hot packs for 15 minutes. 2.Postural correction exercises. 3.Isometric strengthening exercises for neck muscles in all directions (Flexion, extension, side bending and rotation). 4.Stretching for common tight muscles (Trapezius, levator scapulae and sternocleidomastoid muscles). 5.Chin tuck exercises. 6.Scapular stabilization exercises

  • mulligan mobilization

    Other intervention

    Participant will sit comfortably supported in a chair with a neutral head and cervical spine position. Practitioner, A gentle, painless posterior-to-anterior (PA) glide will be applied to the facets (bony projections) on the spinous process or the articular pillar/cervical lamina. This glide will be maintained throughout the movement. Participant Action: While the glide will be held, the participant actively will move their neck in the direction that previously caused pain. If pain-free, the participant can gently push further into the movement restriction

  • active release technique

    Other intervention

    The patient will sit on a stool with hands supported on the thighs, the therapist will apply deep pressure on both sides of levator scapulae and upper trapezius muscles (over the area of tenderness) and the patient will be instructed to actively move the muscle from a shortened to lengthened position and thereby breaking adhesions.1 set of 3-5 repetitions in one session

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: conventional treatmentActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Mulligan mobilization techniqueExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: active release techniqueExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Cervical range of motion

Cervical ROM will be assessed using CROM device.

Time frame
4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Neck function

Arabic version of neck disability index will be used to assess neck function

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Pain intensity

Numerical Rating Scale will be used to assess pain intensity

Time frame
4 weeks

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: