Comparing Effects of HIIT and MICT on Functional Mobility, Muscle Strength, and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age35-65
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

To compare the effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on functional mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in individuals with type-2-diabetes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Both male and female diabetic patients.

Individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least five years.

Individuals able to participate in moderate to intense physical activity.

Disqualifiers

• Individuals with significant orthopedic limitations.

Individuals with uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal issues.

Individuals with incontinence issues during physical activity or inability to comply to study protocols

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • High Intensity Interval Training

    Other intervention

    3 session per week, 12 weeks sessions continued, each session had 4 sets of 4 minutes exercise with 3 min active rest inbetween routines. total 30 minutes per session, Sprinting and Jump squatting RPE 15-18

  • Moderate Intensity Continuous Training

    Other intervention

    3 session per week, 12 weeks sessions continued, 40 minutes one single exercise regime with no intervals. Brisk Walking on Treadmill, RPE-11-13

Treatment groups

28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: High Intensity Interval TrainingActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Moderate Intensity Continuous TrainingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

TUG timed up go test

Functional mobility is evaluated by the TUG test. The TUG test has revealed very high test-retest reliability among patients with diabetes, as shown by the ICC values from 0.93 to 0.99

Time frame
baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week
2

Hand Grip Strength Test

To assess the power of muscles a dynamometer used to test the gripping power of participants making an objective estimate of the strength of the muscles in the upper body. This method had the same validity as that of the whole functional capacity in diabetic populations, with coefficients of 0.70 to 0.85 being most common

Time frame
baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week
3

Chair Stand Test

In order to evaluate again the strength of the lower limb muscles. The individuals were measured how fast they could stand up from a chair and sit down again and again, which is an indicator of muscle endurance and functional strength. The test has shown really high reliability in diabetic populations with ICC values being around 0.85 to 0.91.

Time frame
baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week
4

The Borg 6-20 Scale

The Borg 6-20 scale used to measure the rate of perceived exertion. It has a strong relationship with heart rate and oxygen consumption with the range of correlation coefficients between 0.80 and 0.88 for diabetic individuals. The Borg RPE scale in T2DM has a test-retest reliability indicated by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of about 0.85 to 0.92, which means that people give similar ratings of their exertion consistently across repeated sessions in similar exercise conditions

Time frame
baseline pre exam, 6th week of intervention, and 12th week

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: