Comparison Between C-mac,Pentax Video Laryngoscopes and Machintosh Laryngoscope
ConditionIntubation; Difficult or Failed
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorMinia University
About this trial
Asses and compare the practility and the level of difficulty in using C-mac and pentax video-laryngoscopes or the traditional Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation in ICU patients while wearing face shield
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
All patients between age 18 - 65 year who will need elective orotracheal intubation will be included in the study after collection of data relevant to intubation
Disqualifiers
• Patients with BMI > 35.
Pregnant and lactating patients.
Burn and facial trauma patients.
Suspected or confirmed spine injury.
Trial population
All patients between age 18 - 65 year who will need elective orotracheal intubation will be included in the study after collection of data relevant to intubation except: * Patients with BMI \> 35. * Pregnant and lactating patients. * Burn and facial trauma patients. * Suspected or confirmed spine injury. * Presence of any predictors or history of difficult intubation.
Trial design
Design model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
84 Participants
are grouped into 3 trial groupsGroup A: C-mac video laryngoscope group
Group B: Pentax video-laryngoscope group
Group C: Machintosh laryngoscope group
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Success rate of first pass of orotracheal intubation
Passage of the orotracheal tube from the first time confirmed By capnography
Time frame
Untill the end of the study in average of 1 yearSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: