Clinical trials

Severe abdominal trauma is a leading cause of early death from bleeding and of later death from sepsis and organ failure. Clinicians use scoring systems to estimate the risk of dying, but most of these scores were developed and calibrated in high-income trauma systems and may perform differently in high-volume referral hospitals elsewhere, where patients frequently arrive after a prehospital delay and already in established shock. This study will prospectively follow consecutive patients aged 16 years and older admitted to a single tertiary trauma centre with severe abdominal injury over a 12-month period. Severe abdominal trauma is defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or more for the abdominal region, and/or an abdominal injury requiring emergency laparotomy, laparoscopy or angioembolisation, and/or admission to intensive care for management of an abdominal injury. A total of 430 evaluable patients is anticipated. Information generated as part of routine trauma care will be recorded prospectively from arrival until hospital discharge: age, sex and comorbidity; injury mechanism, time from injury to arrival and mode of arrival; arrival physiology (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, shock index, Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature); admission biochemistry (arterial lactate, base deficit, pH, haemoglobin, platelet count, INR); imaging and operative findings with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma organ injury grades; transfusion and operative management; and in-hospital complications. The primary outcome is in-hospital all-cause mortality. Survivors and non-survivors will be compared, and a multivariable logistic regression model will be built to identify admission and early in-hospital variables that independently predict death. Model discrimination and calibration will be assessed and internally validated by bootstrap resampling, and performance will be compared with that of the Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, TRISS and the MGAP score. If the model is robust, a simplified integer bedside risk score will be derived and internally validated. The study is purely observational: it mandates no additional investigations, interventions or visits, and all clinical decisions remain with the attending trauma team according to institutional ATLS-based protocols. The findings are intended to support locally valid triage, transfusion and damage-control decision-making and to enable fair outcome benchmarking between comparable centres.

This is a single-center, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy with modified N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate(Glubran® 2) versus standard pancreaticojejunostomy without cyanoacrylate in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with soft pancreatic texture. The primary endpoint is the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula at 30 days post-surgery, as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) criteria.Secondary outcomes include surgical complications and length of hospital stay. The study will enroll approximately 194 patients at a single center.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether two different tooth-preservation techniques work equally well when placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed in the front of the mouth (the "esthetic zone"). It will also learn whether using artificial intelligence (AI) to help plan the surgery improves the results. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does keeping part of the root in place using a technique called autogenous root slice replantation work as well as a similar technique called socket shielding, in terms of appearance and gum health around the implant? * Does AI-guided surgical planning improve accuracy, appearance, and gum health compared with traditional planning? Researchers will compare participants who receive autogenous root slice replantation to participants who receive the socket-shield technique to see if one produces better outcomes than the other. Both groups will have their implants placed using a 3D-printed surgical guide made from AI-assisted digital planning. Participants will: * Have a tooth removed and an implant placed on the same day, using one of the two techniques * Have their surgery guided by a custom surgical guide, planned with AI assistance * Return for follow-up visits so researchers can check healing, gum appearance, and how well the implant fits with their smile

Achalasia is a disorder of the esophagus in which the muscular valve between the esophagus and the stomach fails to relax, and the body of the esophagus loses its normal coordinated squeezing movement. People with achalasia have difficulty swallowing both solids and liquids, bring up undigested food, may have chest pain, and often lose weight. None of the available treatments cures the disease; all of them work by reducing the resistance at the junction between the esophagus and the stomach so that food and liquid can pass more easily. Two established treatments do this by cutting the muscle of the valve (a myotomy). Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with a Dor anterior partial fundoplication (LHM + Dor) is performed through small abdominal incisions and includes a wrap of the stomach designed to limit acid reflux afterwards. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieves the same muscle division from inside the esophagus through a tunnel created under the lining, with no skin incisions and no anti-reflux wrap. POEM allows a longer, tailored myotomy, which may be an advantage in the spastic (type III) form of the disease, but reflux after the procedure is more common because no wrap is performed. This trial will randomly assign 220 adults with newly diagnosed, previously untreated achalasia, in equal numbers, to receive either POEM or LHM + Dor. Randomization will be stratified by achalasia subtype (Chicago Classification type I or II versus type III). The main question is whether POEM controls symptoms about as well as LHM + Dor, so the trial is designed as a non-inferiority study with a pre-specified margin of 12.5 percentage points. The primary outcome is clinical success at 12 months, defined as an Eckardt symptom score of 3 or less without any further treatment for achalasia. Participants will be assessed before treatment and again at 30 days and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Assessments include the Eckardt symptom score, reflux symptoms and quality of life, upper endoscopy, high-resolution manometry, timed barium esophagram and, at 3 months, 24-hour pH-impedance testing to measure acid reflux objectively. Complications will be graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical events and the AGREE classification for endoscopic events. Because one treatment is endoscopic and the other is laparoscopic, neither the participants nor the operators can be masked. To protect against biased outcome assessment, the investigators reporting manometry, endoscopy, barium studies and pH-impedance, the trial statistician and the endpoint adjudication committee will all be masked to treatment allocation. The trial will be conducted at Minia University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt, with provision for expansion to additional tertiary centers under a common standard-operating-procedure manual.

Laparoscopic fundoplication is the standard operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that does not respond adequately to medication, and it relieves reflux symptoms in most patients who are carefully selected for it. Even so, published studies consistently report that between 10% and 30% of patients continue to have symptoms afterwards, develop troublesome side effects such as difficulty swallowing or bloating, or are dissatisfied with the result. Much of this disappointment reflects who was chosen for surgery rather than any technical fault in the operation: patients whose symptoms are not actually caused by acid reflux predictably gain little benefit from a well-constructed wrap. Individual factors measured before surgery, such as the amount of acid in the esophagus, the link between symptoms and reflux episodes, the type of symptoms, and how well the patient responded to acid-suppressing tablets, have each been linked to the outcome. However, most of that evidence comes from retrospective studies that used different definitions of success, so it is still unclear which factors matter independently once they are considered together. This study will follow adults with objectively confirmed GERD who are scheduled for elective laparoscopic fundoplication at Minia University Hospitals. Before surgery, every participant undergoes the same standardized assessment: upper endoscopy, 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring off acid-suppressing medication, high-resolution manometry, measurement of height and weight, and questionnaires covering reflux symptoms, anxiety, depression and physical symptom burden. Participants then complete validated symptom questionnaires again at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the operation. The main measure of success is "responder status" at 12 months, meaning at least a 50% improvement in the total GERD-HRQL symptom score compared with before surgery, supported by the patient's own rating of satisfaction. The investigators will analyze ten factors recorded before surgery to determine which of them independently predict this outcome, and will use the results to build and test a prediction tool that surgeons can apply during preoperative counseling. The study does not assign any treatment. The type of wrap performed, either a complete (Nissen) or a partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication, is chosen by the treating surgeon according to a prespecified rule based on esophageal motility, exactly as in routine practice. Taking part involves completing questionnaires and attending the usual follow-up appointments, and adds no additional procedural risk.

This retrospective cohort study investigates predictors of postoperative hypocalcemia following thyroidectomy procedures at Minia University Hospital over a 10-year period (2014-2024). Postthyroidectomy hypocalcemia is one of the most common complications of thyroid surgery, affecting 20-50% of patients. The study aims to identify demographic, clinical, laboratory, and surgical factors associated with the development of both transient and permanent hypocalcemia. Results will inform risk stratification, patient counseling, and perioperative management strategies.

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of peroxide and non-peroxide in-office tooth bleaching systems. The study will evaluate tooth whitening efficacy, color durability over time, and tooth sensitivity after treatment. Participants will receive one of the two bleaching treatments and will be followed for six months to assess the clinical outcomes and compare the performance of both systems.

Bacterial keratitis is a potentially sight-threatening corneal infection that is commonly treated with intensive topical antibiotics. Despite appropriate therapy, some cases show inadequate clinical response, particularly when the infection involves the deep corneal stroma. Limited penetration of topical antibiotics into deeper corneal layers may contribute to treatment failure in these recalcitrant cases. Intrastromal antibiotic injection is a targeted drug-delivery approach that allows high local antimicrobial concentrations directly at the site of infection. Moxifloxacin is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone with proven efficacy in bacterial keratitis and favorable corneal tissue penetration. However, evidence regarding the clinical benefit and safety of intrastromal moxifloxacin as an adjunctive treatment remains limited. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrastromal moxifloxacin injection as an adjunct to standard topical moxifloxacin therapy compared with topical therapy alone in patients with recalcitrant bacterial keratitis. The primary outcome is time to complete clinical resolution of infection. Secondary outcomes include visual acuity improvement, ulcer healing rate, need for additional interventions, and treatment-related complications.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Recent evidence suggests that mesopancreatic excision (TMpE) may improve R0 resection rates, reduce local recurrence, and enhance overall survival compared to standard pancreatoduodenectomy. However, most existing studies are retrospective with heterogeneous patient populations and surgical techniques. This prospective study aims to evaluate the impact of mesopancreatic excision, a surgical technique involving the meticulous removal of retroperitoneal tissue surrounding major peripancreatic vessels, on local disease control and overall survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable PDAC. The study will also assess R0 resection rates, disease-free survival, recurrence patterns and perioperative outcomes.

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of injecting N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®) into the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) to enhance the security of the pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) anastomosis and reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery significantly improved the survival of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, but there is a problem that only about 50% of patients start adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might control potential metastatic lesions which are not being detected in early disease status and improve the R0 resection rate. In addition, it prevents futile surgery by selecting patients with rapid progression of disease. Furthermore, compared to chemotherapy administered after surgery, more patients can complete the planned chemotherapy schedule in neoadjuvant setting. There are still few studies worldwide that prospectively explored the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable PC and periampullary cancer and the administration of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable PC depends on individual clinical judgment. Therefore, systematic and prospective clinical trials are essential to standardize treatment protocol in resectable PC and periampullary Cancer. This randomized controlled trial compares neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for patients with clearly resectable pancreatic head cancer and periampullary cancer. The study aims to determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival compared to immediate surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Endodontic treatment aims to achieve optimal biological outcomes while minimizing patient's discomfort during and after the procedure. Postoperative pain remains a common complication and is considered a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by several factors, including preoperative pain, age, gender, systemic health, presence of apical periodontitis, instrumentation technique, type and design of endodontic instruments, and the use of intracanal medications.

The ultimate biological aim of endodontic therapy is to either prevent or heal apical periodontitis. Root canal treatment can fail for various reasons, such as persistent infection, missing canals, ledges, canal transportation, instrument separation, and perforation. Post-treatment apical periodontitis is an inflammatory response in the tissues surrounding the root tip, triggered by either lingering bacteria from the initial procedure or a new, secondary infection within the canal system. Statistically, this condition affects roughly 5% to 20% of cases where apical periodontitis was present before the initial treatment.

This study compares two different preoperative doses of a heart-rate-lowering medication called ivabradine in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia. Patients will receive either a lower dose, a higher dose, or a placebo (inactive pill) before surgery. The goal is to see which approach best keeps blood pressure and heart rate stable during surgery, and whether it reduces bleeding and improves the surge

The main aim of endodontic therapy is to disinfect the entire root canal system (RCS), which requires the elimination of microorganisms and microbial components. This goal is pursued by chemo-mechanical debridement of the RCS. Attaining this goal remains challenging due to the complex and variable anatomy of the root canal system, which includes intricate structures such as fins, isthmuses, lateral canals, and apical deltas that are often inaccessible to mechanical instrumentation. To overcome these anatomical limitations, various irrigation protocols have been developed to enhance the penetration and effectiveness of irrigating solutions.The use of different activation techniques-such as manual dynamic agitation, irrigation needle, sonic and ultrasonic activation, and negative pressure irrigation systems-aims to improve the distribution, exchange, and cleaning ability of irrigants within hard-to-reach areas of the canal system.These approaches are designed to maximize microbial reduction and promote more effective removal of debris and smear layer remnants.

Tissue repair is an essential process that reestablishes tissue integrity and regular function. Nevertheless, different therapeutic factors and clinical conditions may interfere in this process of periapical healing.The success of root canal treatment is affected by the correct choice of clinical protocol. These factors are dependent on the sanitization process (instrumentation, irrigating solution, irrigating strategies, and intracanal dressing) the apical limit of the root canal preparation and obturation, and the quality of the sealer. The challenges affecting the healing process of endodontically treated teeth include control of the inflammation of pulp or infectious processes and simultaneous neutralization of unpredictable provocations to the periapical tissue.

The persistent and secondary intraradicular infections are the primary causes of post-treatment disease following endodontic treatment of any tooth. When conventional root canal treatment fails, endodontic retreatment is often the preferred option, as it represents one of the most conservative approaches. Endodontic retreatment involves removing old root canal filling material followed by cleaning, shaping, and refilling the canals. It may be associated with postoperative pain due to periapical tissue irritation and apical extrusion of debris during instrumentation.

Removing a large part of the liver (major hepatectomy) can cure primary and secondary liver cancers, but it carries the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), a serious complication in which the liver left behind - the future liver remnant (FLR) - cannot meet the body's metabolic needs. PHLF occurs after roughly 5% to 15% of major hepatectomies and is the leading cause of postoperative death. Before surgery, surgeons routinely use CT scans to measure how much liver will remain (CT volumetry). Volume alone does not tell the whole story. After a large resection the remaining liver can rotate and shift into the empty space left behind, kinking or compressing the veins that drain it. The resulting congestion can make an apparently adequate remnant fail. This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study tests whether adding two elements to standard CT volumetry improves the preoperative prediction of liver failure: 1. Hepatic vascular deformation mapping (VDM), a three-dimensional image-analysis technique that quantifies the geometry and displacement of the hepatic veins and the portal vein; and 2. A set of simple, reproducible measurements that any radiologist can make on a standard CT scan (hepatic vein diameters, congestion index, spleen volume, liver attenuation, and the distances from the veins to the planned resection plane). Consecutive adults undergoing major hepatic resection (three or more Couinaud segments) at several tertiary hepatobiliary centers will be enrolled. The preoperative CT scans already performed as part of routine care are analyzed centrally by a core imaging laboratory. There is no additional imaging, no extra hospital visit, and no study-specific intervention: every patient receives standard surgical care. Participants are followed for at least 30 days after surgery to record liver failure (International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria, operationalized by the "50-50" rule on postoperative day 5) and radiologic evidence of hepatic congestion. Three nested prediction models are compared - volumetry alone; volumetry plus VDM; and volumetry plus VDM plus the simple radiology parameters - and the best-performing model is converted into a practical risk score. Because the study runs across several centers, the model can be validated by leaving one center out at a time, which gives an honest estimate of how well it would perform at a new hospital. The goal is a generalizable, easy-to-use tool that tells surgeons, before the operation, which patients are genuinely at risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether preventive surgical techniques can reduce the incidence of lower eyelid ectropion after the subciliary approach in adult patients undergoing surgery for orbital fractures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do lateral canthopexy or orbicularis oculi suspension reduce the incidence of postoperative ectropion? Which preventive technique provides better postoperative lower eyelid outcomes? Researchers will compare three groups: subciliary approach alone, subciliary approach with lateral canthopexy, and subciliary approach with orbicularis oculi suspension to investigate which approach is most effective in preventing postoperative ectropion. Participants will undergo surgical treatment according to their assigned group and will attend scheduled postoperative follow-up visits for clinical evaluation of lower eyelid position and surgical outcomes.

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with mesh is the standard repair for ventral, incisional, parastomal and complex abdominal wall defects, but mesh-related infection remains one of its most serious complications - prolonging hospital stay, often requiring reoperation or removal of the mesh, and increasing the risk of hernia recurrence. Reported infection rates vary widely, and the independent contribution of individual risk factors remains uncertain, in large part because much of the existing evidence comes from retrospective series with inconsistent outcome definitions. This single-centre, prospective observational cohort study will enrol consecutive adults undergoing elective or urgent AWR with synthetic, biosynthetic or biological mesh at a tertiary referral hernia unit. Participants will be followed for 12 months on a fixed schedule (7-10 days, 30 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months). Using internationally accepted, prespecified definitions of mesh infection and surgical site occurrence, the study will collect up to 18 candidate patient, defect, operative and perioperative risk factors and analyse them by multivariable logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of mesh-related infection within 90 days of surgery. Secondary aims are to describe the incidence, timing, microbiology and management (salvage versus explantation) of mesh infection; to report surgical site occurrences and reoperation; and to derive an exploratory risk-stratification model. The findings are intended to support preoperative risk assessment, targeted patient optimisation, informed mesh and technique selection, and shared decision-making. The study is designed and reported in accordance with the STROBE statement.

This trial asks whether covering the inner, bowel-facing surface of a hernia mesh with a flap of the patient's own hernia sac improves healing after repair of a complex ventral (abdominal wall) hernia in which one edge of the defect is bone - for example hernias next to the breastbone and ribs, above the pubic bone, or at the iliac crest. In these "bony-edged" hernias the mesh is both hardest to fix and hardest to cover. There is no fascia on the bony side for the surgeon to stitch the mesh to, and the lining layer of the abdomen cannot be closed underneath the mesh because the plane that carries it stops at the bone. The mesh may therefore be left in contact with the bowel, which can lead to dense adhesions, mesh erosion, chronic pain and, rarely, a fistula. Normally the hernia sac - the thin membrane that lines the hernia - is cut away and discarded. In this trial the surgeon instead preserves it as a living, blood-supplied flap, rotates it underneath the mesh, and stitches it in place as a new lining layer that separates the mesh from the bowel and covers the bony edge. The technique uses only the patient's own tissue: no extra mesh, no donor site and no added cost. One hundred and eighty adults undergoing planned (non-emergency) open repair of a bony-edged complex ventral hernia will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to one of two groups: standard retromuscular (sublay) mesh repair with the added sac flap (90 participants), or standard retromuscular mesh repair alone, with the sac handled in the conventional way (90 participants). Every other step of the operation is the same in both groups. The main question is whether the sac flap reduces the number of participants who develop any wound or mesh problem in the first 30 days after surgery. This is measured as a composite called a surgical site occurrence, which includes wound infection, seroma, haematoma, skin or soft-tissue death, wound breakdown, mesh exposure and fistula. The trial also compares complications needing a drainage or operative procedure, hernia recurrence at 12 months, overall complication severity, operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, readmission, reoperation, pain, quality of life and death. Participants, ward and clinic staff, the doctors who assess the wounds, the radiologist who reads the follow-up scans and the trial statistician will not know which operation was performed; only the operating surgeon will. The group assignment is revealed only during the operation, after the surgeon has confirmed that the defect truly has a bony edge and that the sac is suitable for a flap. Participants are followed for 12 months.

Postoperative pain (PP) is one of the most common and clinically significant complications following endodontic therapy, occurring shortly after treatment and potentially lasting from a few hours to several days, thereby compromising the patient's quality of life. The incidence of PP varies widely in the literature, ranging from 1.7% to 70%, with some studies reporting values up to 80% within the first 24 hours, gradually decreasing over a week.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare whether immediate implant placement using the socket-shield technique can better preserve bone density, bone level, and peri-implant tissue health compared to conventional immediate implant placement in patients requiring tooth extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone. This study is conducted in systemically healthy adult patients aged 20-60 years who have non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth indicated for immediate implant placement. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does the socket-shield technique result in better peri-implant bone density and bone level preservation compared to the conventional immediate implant technique? Does the socket-shield technique lead to improved clinical peri-implant parameters, including probing depth, bleeding on probing, keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness? participants will be divided into two groups: (both groups will receive immediate implant placement of a tooth requiring extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone.) First group: will recieve immediate implant using conventional technique. second group: will recieve immediate implant using socket shield technique. Participants will: * Undergo clinical and radiographic examinations, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). * Receive immediate implant placement using either the conventional technique or the socket-shield technique. * Be followed up clinically and radiographically for 9 months to assess bone and soft tissue healing. * Attend regular postoperative and follow-up visits for evaluation of implant stability and peri-implant tissue health.

The prevalence of incidental thyroid cancer (ITC) in Graves' Disease (GD) patients undergoing thyroidectomy appears higher than historically believed, potentially exceeding 10% in large contemporary series, although significant variability exists. The presence of nodules is a strong predictor, while the roles of age, sex, and BMI require clarification. Most ITCs are papillary thyroid microcarcinoma(PTMCs) with generally favorable prognoses, but concerns about aggressiveness persist. The purpose of the present study is to accurately evaluate the prevalence of incidental thyroid carcinoma (ITC), including microcarcinomas, in a prospectively enrolled cohort of patients undergoing total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease, utilizing standardized pathological examination protocols and secondary outcomes including predictors and histopathological characteristics.

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common and debilitating complication of spinal anesthesia in pregnant patients undergoing cesarean sections, with an incidence ranging from 0.5% to 2% (1). The International Headache Society (IHS) defines PDPH as a headache occurring within 4 days of a lumbar puncture, caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage through the dural puncture (2). Although the exact cause of PDPH is not fully understood, it is thought to occur due to cerebrospinal fluid loss through dural tears, which leads to tension on pain-sensitive intracranial structures and reflex, uncontrolled cerebral vasodilation leading to severe agonizing tension headache (3). Treatment options include proper hydration, maintaining a supine position, caffeine, paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Many adjuvants have been questioned for their therapeutic effectiveness in enhancing conservative medical treatments, with conflicting results (4). For example, sumatriptan, theophylline and dexmedetomidine have been extensively studied. Neostigmine has emerged as a promising pharmacological adjuvant for conservative management. Neostigmine increases the serum level of acetylcholine via inhibition of cholinesterase (5). This action mediates cerebral vasoconstriction via nicotinic receptors, thus antagonizing the unopposed vasodilatation occurred due to dural tear. Lidocaine, on the other hand, can mediate sphenopalatine ganglion block which is responsible for pain signals transmission from the face (6).