Comparison Between Socket Shield and Conventional Techniques in Immediate Implant Placement.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-60
SponsorMinia University

About this trial

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare whether immediate implant placement using the socket-shield technique can better preserve bone density, bone level, and peri-implant tissue health compared to conventional immediate implant placement in patients requiring tooth extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone.

This study is conducted in systemically healthy adult patients aged 20-60 years who have non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth indicated for immediate implant placement.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does the socket-shield technique result in better peri-implant bone density and bone level preservation compared to the conventional immediate implant technique?

Does the socket-shield technique lead to improved clinical peri-implant parameters, including probing depth, bleeding on probing, keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness?

participants will be divided into two groups: (both groups will receive immediate implant placement of a tooth requiring extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone.) First group: will recieve immediate implant using conventional technique. second group: will recieve immediate implant using socket shield technique.

Participants will:

* Undergo clinical and radiographic examinations, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). * Receive immediate implant placement using either the conventional technique or the socket-shield technique. * Be followed up clinically and radiographically for 9 months to assess bone and soft tissue healing. * Attend regular postoperative and follow-up visits for evaluation of implant stability and peri-implant tissue health.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients aged between 20 and 60 years of both genders

All participants should be systemically healthy, as assessed using the dental modification of the Cornell Medical Index.

Gingival and periodontal health to be confirmed according to the criteria outlined in the new classification system proposed by Caton et al. (2018).

Presence of non-restorable teeth due to trauma, complicated crowns or root fractures.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant female.

Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching).

Smokers.

Teeth with clinical mobility.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional Technique
  • Socket-Shield Technique

Treatment groups

16 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators