Comparison Between Liquid Fibrin and Soft Laser Effects on Healing and Relapse After Lip Repositioning Surgery

ConditionGummy Smile
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorDamascus University

About this trial

A gummy smile can negatively affect a patient's self-confidence and satisfaction with their appearance, leading many individuals to seek effective esthetic solutions. The etiology of this condition varies and may include vertical maxillary excess, short upper lip, hyperactive upper lip, gingival enlargement, or altered passive eruption.

Lip Repositioning Surgery is one of the minimally invasive esthetic surgical procedures used to reduce the amount of gingival display during smiling. Despite its effectiveness, this surgery may be associated with challenges such as pain, swelling, delayed wound healing, and the possibility of postoperative relapse over time, which could compromise both esthetic and functional outcomes.

To overcome these challenges and enhance surgical outcomes, adjunctive techniques have been introduced to promote healing and determine whether enhancing the biological healing process can reduce the rate of relapse after LRS. Among the most prominent of these are Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients of both genders.

Patients presenting with a gummy smile in the maxillary anterior region (more than 3 mm) due to upper lip hypermobility.

Age 18-50 years.

Systemically healthy individuals, classified as ASA physical status I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification; that is, patients without systemic disease or with mild, well-controlled systemic conditions.

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy and lactation.

Individuals with a previous history of receiving facial Botox or filler injections.

Systemic diseases or conditions that contraindicate the use of local anesthesia.

Any physical condition that impairs the ability to perform proper oral hygiene measures.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin group

    Other intervention

    A partial thickness elliptical mucogingival incision was made from the mesial of the central incisor to the mesial of the first molar bilaterally with preservation of the frenulum; vertical height set to twice the excessive gingival display (2:1 ratio), lower margin 1 mm coronal to the mucogingival junction. Epithelium elevated to expose connective tissue (preserving minor salivary glands). Periosteal sutures (4-0 Vicryl, 2-3 per side) placed where connective tissue ≥0.5 mm ; incision edges approximated with simple interrupted 4-0 silk sutures. 20 mL blood collected into additive-free plastic tubes and centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 minutes. The Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin layer was aspirated and injected immediately after surgery along incision margins and surrounding tissue at 1 mm depth, multiple points 2-3 mm apart (≈0.1 mL per injection) to achieve homogeneous distribution.

  • low-level laser group

    Other intervention

    A partial thickness elliptical mucogingival incision was made from the mesial of the central incisor to the mesial of the first molar bilaterally with preservation of the frenulum; vertical height set to twice the excessive gingival display (2:1 ratio), lower margin 1 mm coronal to the mucogingival junction. Epithelium elevated to expose connective tissue (preserving minor salivary glands). Periosteal sutures (4-0 Vicryl, 2-3 per side) placed where connective tissue ≥0.5 mm to ; incision edges approximated with simple interrupted 4-0 silk sutures. low-level laser applied to the surgical site (635nm, 200 mW) as part of the post-surgical treatment and at 3,7,10, and 14 days after surgery.

Treatment groups

22 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Low-Level Laser groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Gingival display (mm)

Measured in millimeters from the lowest point of the upper lip vermilion border to the free gingival margin of the maxillary teeth (from right second premolar to left second premolar) during full smile.

Time frame
Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively
2

Wound Healing Index

Wound healing will be assessed using the Wound Healing Index (Huang, Neiva, and Wang, 2005). This is a categorical scale with scores ranging from 1 to 3: 1. = poor healing (significant gingival swelling or redness, severe patient discomfort, slough formation with suppuration); 2. = good healing (mild gingival swelling or redness, mild patient discomfort, slough formation without suppuration); 3. = complete healing (no gingival swelling, redness, suppuration, or patient discomfort, and no slough formation). Higher scores indicate better healing outcomes.

Time frame
weekly for 4 weeks postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

1

Postoperative Pain (VAS 0-100)

Postoperative pain assessed using patient self-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst possible pain. Pain will be recorded daily for the first 7 days after surgery.

Time frame
Days 1-7 postoperatively
2

Postoperative Edema/Swelling

Postoperative edema/swelling assessed on the third day after surgery using a clinician-reported rating scale: 0 = no visible oedema; 1. = slight oedema (intra- oral swelling in the surgical zone); 2. = moderate oedema (extra- oral swelling in the surgical area); 3. = severe oedema (extra- oral swelling extending the surgical site) and/or visible hematoma and ecchymosis

Time frame
Day 3 postoperatively
3

Esthetic Satisfaction (VAS 0-100)

Esthetic satisfaction assessed using patient self-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100), where 0 indicates completely dissatisfied and 100 indicates completely satisfied. Evaluation will be performed 6 months postoperatively.

Time frame
6 months postoperatively
4

Upper Lip External Length

Measured from the base of the nose to the lower edge of the vermilion border of the upper lip, assessed at both resting and maximum smiling positions

Time frame
Baseline, 1,3 and 6 months postoperatively

Other outcomes

Locations

1

Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.

Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus university , Syria.Recruiting Damascus, Rif-dimashq GovernorateSyria

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.