Comparison of a Lithotripsy vs Standard Preparation Followed by Stenting With Supera Stent in Femoropopliteal Lesions

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Leipzig

About this trial

This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, 1:1 randomized pilot study.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to standard lesion preparation using standard and/or high-pressure balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. All patients will receive subsequent Supera stent implantation at the operator's discretion. Additional standard nitinol bare metal stent (BMS), drug-eluting stent or covered stent implantation is at the operator's discretion.

Patients will be stratified for total occlusions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subject age ≥ 18

Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved inform consent form

Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing

Rutherford Classification 2-5

Disqualifiers

Failure to successfully cross the target lesion

Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion

Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s

Presence of a stent in the target lesion, at least 3cm from any previously stent in target vessel

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Intravascular lithotripsy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Lesion preparation with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithotripsy System

  • Standard lesion preparation

    Procedure/Surgery

    Lesion preparation with Standard and/or High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intravascular lithotripsy armOther 1 intervention
Group B: Standard lesion preparation armOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Primary efficacy

Procedural success defined as residual stenosis ≤ 30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥Grade D) in the final angiogram and without the need of additional stent implantation.

Time frame
During the Procedure
2

Rate of primary outcome events

Composite endpoint defined as freedom from device and procedure-related death, freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization

Time frame
12 month

Secondary outcomes

1

Rate of vessel rupture

Rate of vessel rupture

Time frame
During the Procedure
2

Need of additional stent implantation

Need of additional stent implantation

Time frame
During the Procedure
3

Procedure Time (min)

Procedure Time (min)

Time frame
During the Procedure
4

Fluoroscopy Duration (min)

Fluoroscopy Duration (min)

Time frame
During the Procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.